Background: Trauma patients are at a significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), with lower extremity fractures (LEF) being independent risk factors. Use of direct oral anticoagusants (DOACs)... Show moreBackground: Trauma patients are at a significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), with lower extremity fractures (LEF) being independent risk factors. Use of direct oral anticoagusants (DOACs) for VTE prophylaxis is effective in elective orthopedic surgery, but currently not approved for trauma patients. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis of DOACs with lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in trauma patients sustaining LEF.Materials and methods: We included adult trauma patients admitted to trauma quality improvement program participating trauma centers (between 2013 and 2016), who sustained LEF and were started on DOACs or LMWH for thromboprophylaxis after admission. Propensity score matching was performed to compare symptomatic VTE and bleeding control interventions between the groups.Results: Of 1,009,922 patients in trauma quality improvement program, 167,640 met inclusion criteria (165,009 received LMWH and 2631 received DOACs). After propensity score matching, 2280 predominantly elderly (median age: 67 y) isolated femur fracture patients (median ISS: 10) were included in each group (4560 patients in total). Symptomatic VTE occurred in 1.4% of patients in both matched groups (P = 0.992). Bleeding control interventions occurred less often in the DOAC group, albeit statistically insignificant (5.8% versus 6.0%, P = 0.772).Conclusions: This study found similar rates of VTE and bleeding control measures for thromboprophylaxis with DOACs or LMWH in matched trauma patients with LEF. Further prospective research is warranted to consolidate the safety of DOAC thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients with LEF. Favorable oral administration and likely increased adherence could benefit this high-risk population. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. Show less
Improving survival rates in children and adolescents with malignant bone tumours, paved the way to the application of new surgical extremity-salvage techniques. For the surgical treatment of... Show moreImproving survival rates in children and adolescents with malignant bone tumours, paved the way to the application of new surgical extremity-salvage techniques. For the surgical treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower extremity, there are a number of resection options (amputation, limb sparing, and rotationplasty) available. Each option has its own indication and after the surgery different advantages and disadvantages. The debate is whether limb-salvage or ablative surgery is advantageous for the individual patient. Purpose of the studies presented in this thesis are evaluate and compare QoL, functional ability and physical activity levels among children and young adults in the first years after bone cancer surgery of the leg. A cross sectional and a prospective study were conducted in the Dutch university bone cancer centres. The results of the cross-sectional study show that outcomes are equivalent for those undergoing limb salvage or ablative surgery. The results of the prospective study showed that; survivors improve in the two years following resection of the bone tumour and the resulting limb-sparing or ablative surgery at all domains evaluated, with the exception of the mental QoL domains. These improvements were most pronounced over the first year after surgery. Show less
