Introduction: There is no consensus regarding the efficacy of add-on therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) in the treatment of seizures in neonates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy... Show moreIntroduction: There is no consensus regarding the efficacy of add-on therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) in the treatment of seizures in neonates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of add-on therapy with LEV for achieving >80% seizure reduction after phenobarbital (PB) treatment. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of near term neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with EEG-confirmed seizures despite treatment with PB as first-line therapy and using LEV as 2nd-, 3rd- or 4th-line treatment. Antiseizure medication was administered according to national guidelines. All neonates were monitored with 2-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. The total seizure burden in minutes, 2 h before and 4 h after administration of LEV, was calculated using raw EEG. Primary outcome was the efficacy of LEV in achieving >80% seizure reduction. The efficacy of additional midazolam (MDZ) and lidocaine (LDC) was also calculated. Results: A total of 47 full-term neonates were included. The mean total loading dose of LEV was 40 mg/kg (36–44 mg/kg). Seizure etiology consisted of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n = 11), hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke (n = 16), central nervous system infection (n = 8), genetic (n = 8), metabolic disorders (n = 3), and unknown (n = 1). Following LEV administration, >80% seizure reduction was observed in 17% (8/47) of neonates, whereas it was 23% (6/26) after MDZ and 92% (23/25) after LDC administration. Discussion: Although the cumulative loading dose of LEV was low and the group of infants studied was heterogeneous, the efficacy of LEV as add-on therapy for the treatment of seizures in neonates was limited. The highest seizure reduction rate was seen after LDC administration. Show less
The aim of this thesis was to assess the efficacy (part 1) and tolerability (part 2) of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in glioma patients with epilepsy. In addition, we aimed to get insight into... Show moreThe aim of this thesis was to assess the efficacy (part 1) and tolerability (part 2) of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in glioma patients with epilepsy. In addition, we aimed to get insight into the ASM prescription behavior and treatment policy in brain tumor-related epilepsy (part 3).First-line levetiracetam seems to be the most efficacious ASM in glioma patients, with favourable tolerability. This is demonstrated in multicenter retrospective observational cohort studies, a systematic review, and is the opinion among the vast majority of European neuro-oncology professionals. Enzyme-inducing AMSs should be avoided in glioma patients due to the high risk of adverse effects. ASM use was not independently associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in glioma patients, but alternative factors seem to pose a greater risk for developing neuropsychiatric symptoms. If patients experience uncontrolled seizures on ASM monotherapy, levetiracetam combined with valproic acid has better efficacy than other ASM combinations in glioma patients, while toxicity is similar. Subsequently, potential add-on ASMs in glioma patients experiencing uncontrolled seizures on ASM dual therapy include clobazam, lamotrigine, and lacosamide. Show less
