Colorectal cancer (CRC) is often treated with chemotherapy. However, it is well known that treatment with chemotherapy comes with challenges, such as (severe) adverse events leading to loss of... Show moreColorectal cancer (CRC) is often treated with chemotherapy. However, it is well known that treatment with chemotherapy comes with challenges, such as (severe) adverse events leading to loss of quality of life, treatment discontinuation and sometimes even death. Moreover, chances for curation in the metastatic setting are low. Therefore, a large window of opportunity to improve both safety as well as efficacy of chemotherapeutic treatment for the individual patient exists. A possible approach to improve chemotherapeutic treatment for CRC patients could be the discovery, validation and implementation of new genetic biomarkers. The use of genetic biomarkers allows to identify patients that are at higher risk for severe adverse drug events and to select patients which will benefit the most from chemotherapy. The aim of this thesis was therefore to improve the safety and efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs in patients with colorectal cancer by individualising drug dosing and choice of drug based on germline genetic biomarkers. The described studies in this thesis brought us a few steps closer to safe and effective use of chemotherapeutic drugs in the individual colorectal cancer patient. Irinotecan should no longer be administered without a UGT1A1 genotype test and a start has been made towards personalised medicine for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases. Show less
Aim: To determine the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and cost of UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan.Patients and methods: In this prospective, multicentre, non-randomised study,... Show moreAim: To determine the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and cost of UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan.Patients and methods: In this prospective, multicentre, non-randomised study, patients intended for treatment with irinotecan were pre-therapeutically genotyped for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1)93. Homozygous variant carriers (UGT1A1 poor metabolisers; PMs) received an initial 30% dose reduction. The primary endpoint was incidence of febrile neutropenia in the first two cycles of treatment. Toxicity in UGT1A1 PMs was compared to a historical cohort of UGT1A1 PMs treated with full dose therapy, and to UGT1A1 non-PMs treated with full dose therapy in the current study. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, feasi- bility, and costs.Results: Of the 350 evaluable patients, 31 (8.9%) patients were UGT1A1 PM and received a median 30% dose reduction. The incidence of febrile neutropenia in this group was 6.5% compared to 24% in historical UGT1A1 PMs (P = 0.04) and was comparable to the incidence in UGT1A1 non-PMs treated with full dose therapy. Systemic exposure of SN-38 of reduced dosing in UGT1A1 PMs was still slightly higher compared to a standard-dosed irinotecan patient cohort (difference: thorn 32%). Cost analysis showed that genotype-guided dosing was cost-saving with a cost reduction of V183 per patient.Conclusion: UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing significantly reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in UGT1A1 PM patients treated with irinotecan, results in a therapeutically effec- tive systemic drug exposure, and is cost-saving. Therefore, UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan should be considered standard of care in order to improve individual patient safety. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Show less
Hulshof, E.C.; Deenen, M.J.; Guchelaar, H.J.; Gelderblom, H. 2020
Background: Pre-therapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping is not yet routinely performed in most hospitals in patients starting irinotecan chemotherapy. The aim of this position paper was to evaluate the... Show moreBackground: Pre-therapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping is not yet routinely performed in most hospitals in patients starting irinotecan chemotherapy. The aim of this position paper was to evaluate the available evidence and to assess the potential value of genotyping of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 in patients before starting treatment with irinotecan to reduce the risk of severe toxicity.Methods: The literature was selected and assessed based on five pre-specified criteria: 1) the level of evidence for associations between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and irinotecan-induced severe toxicity, 2) clinical validity and utility of pre-therapeutic genotyping of UGT1A1, 3) safety and tolerability of irinotecan in carriers of UGT1A1 polymorphisms, 4) availability of specific dose recommendations for irinotecan in carriers of UGT1A1 polymorphisms, 5) evidence of cost benefits of pre-therapeutic genotyping of UGT1A1.Results: On all five criteria, study results were favourable for pre-therapeutic genotyping of UGT1A1. A high level of evidence (level I) was found for a higher incidence of irinotecan-induced severe toxicity in homozygous carriers of UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A1*6. The clinical validity and utility of this genetic test proved to be acceptable. Dose-finding studies showed a lower maximum tolerated dose in homozygous variant allele carriers, and most of the drug labels and guidelines recommend a dose reduction of 25-30% in these patients. In addition, pre-therapeutic genotyping of UGT1A1 is likely to save costs.Conclusion: Pre-therapeutic genotyping of UGT1A1 in patients initiating treatment with irinotecan improves patient safety, is likely to be cost-saving, and should, therefore, become standard of care. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. Show less
In this thesis, we focus on the palliative treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. We investigated the potential associations of germline genetic... Show moreIn this thesis, we focus on the palliative treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. We investigated the potential associations of germline genetic variations with the efficacy or toxicity of treatment. We genotyped a selection of SNPs in paired tumor tissue and blood samples of colorectal cancer patients (Chapter 3). Next, we present an overview of clinical and pharmacogenetic factors that have been described to influence irinotecan toxicity (Chapter 4). We investigated the association of febrile neutropenia and drug efficacy with the UGT1A1 genotype in Chapter 5. In Chapter 6, we investigated the GSTP1 Ile105Val SNP with regard to irinotecan efficacy in terms of progression-free survival. We also provide an overview of pharmacogenetic, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on this platinum derivative (Chapter 7). In Chapter 8, we transfected ERCC1 negative cells with an ERCC1 gene, containing either the codon 118C or 118T genotype, in order to establish differences in cell survival or DNA repair. In chapter 9 we describe our investigations on the cumulative neurotoxicity and efficacy of oxaliplatin. In chapter 10, an explorative study is described that investigates associations of survival and toxicity in patients receiving oxaliplatin, using a SNP array. Show less
