Introduction: As the prognosis of early-stage breast cancer patients is excellent, prevention of radiation induced toxicity has become crucial. Reduction of margins compensating for intrafraction... Show moreIntroduction: As the prognosis of early-stage breast cancer patients is excellent, prevention of radiation induced toxicity has become crucial. Reduction of margins compensating for intrafraction motion reduces non-target dose. We assessed motion of the tumor bed throughout APBI treatment fractions and calculated CTV-PTV margins for breathing and drift.Methods: This prospective clinical trial included patients treated with APBI on a Cyberknife with fiducial tracking. Paired orthogonal kV images made throughout the entire fraction were used to extract the tumor bed position. The images used for breathing modelling were used to calculate breathing amplitudes. The margins needed to compensate for breathing and drift were calculated according to Engelsman and Van Herk respectively.Results: Twenty-two patients, 110 fractions and 5087 image pairs were analyzed. The margins needed for breathing were 0.3-0.6 mm. The margin for drift increased with time after the first imaging for positioning. For a total fraction duration up to 8 min, a margin of 1.0 mm is sufficient. For a fraction of 32 min, 2.5 mm is needed. Techniques that account for breathing motion can reduce the margin by 0.1 mm. There was a systematic trend in the drift in the caudal, medial and posterior direction. To compensate for this, 0.7 mm could be added to the margins.Conclusions: The margin needed to compensate for intrafraction motion increased with longer fraction duration due to drifting of the target. It doubled for a fraction of 24 min compared to 8 min. Breathing motion has a limited effect.(c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 159 (2021) 176-182 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
Lips, I.M.; Gils, C.H. van; Kotte, A.N.T.J.; Leerdam, M.E. van; Franken, S.P.G.; Heide, U.A. van der; Vulpen, M. van 2012
Purpose: To investigate whether magnesium oxide during external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer reduces intrafraction prostate motion in a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial... Show morePurpose: To investigate whether magnesium oxide during external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer reduces intrafraction prostate motion in a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.Methods and Materials: At the Department of Radiotherapy, prostate cancer patients scheduled for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (77 Gy in 35 fractions) using fiducial marker-based position verification were randomly assigned to receive magnesium oxide (500 mg twice a day) or placebo during radiotherapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinically relevant intrafraction prostate motion, defined as the proportion of patients who demonstrated in >= 50% of the fractions an intrafraction motion outside a range of 2 mm. Secondary outcome measures included quality of life and acute toxicity.Results: In total, 46 patients per treatment arm were enrolled. The primary endpoint did not show a statistically significant difference between the treatment arms with a percentage of patients with clinically relevant intrafraction motion of 83% in the magnesium oxide arm as compared with 80% in the placebo arm (p = 1.00). Concerning the secondary endpoints, exploratory analyses demonstrated a trend towards worsened quality of life and slightly more toxicity in the magnesium oxide arm than in the placebo arm; however, these differences were not statistically significant.Conclusions: Magnesium oxide is not effective in reducing the intrafraction prostate motion during external-beam radiotherapy, and therefore there is no indication to use it in clinical practice for this purpose. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. Show less
Lips, I.M.; Kotte, A.N.T.J.; Gils, C.H. van; Leerdam, M.E. van; Heide, U.A. van der; Vulpen, M. van 2011
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of an antiflatulent dietary advice on the intrafraction prostate motion in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.Methods... Show morePurpose: To evaluate the effect of an antiflatulent dietary advice on the intrafraction prostate motion in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.Methods and Materials: Between February 2002 and December 2009, 977 patients received five-beam IMRT for prostate cancer to a dose of 76 Gy in 35 fractions combined with fiducial markers for position verification. In July 2008, the diet, consisting of dietary guidelines to obtain regular bowel movements and to reduce intestinal gas by avoiding certain foods and air swallowing, was introduced to reduce the prostate motion. The intrafraction prostate movement was determined from the portal images of the first segment of all five beams. Clinically relevant intrafraction motion was defined as >= 50% of the fractions with an intrafraction motion outside a range of 3 mm.Results: A total of 739 patients were treated without the diet and 105 patients were treated with radiotherapy after introduction of the diet. The median and interquartile range of the average intrafraction motion per patient was 2.53 mm (interquartile range, 2.2-3.0) without the diet and 3.00 mm (interquartile range, 2.4-3.5) with the diet (p < .0001). The percentage of patients with clinically relevant intrafraction motion increased statistically significant from 19.1% without diet to 42.9% with a diet (odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-4.88; p < .0001).Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that antiflatulent dietary advice for patients undergoing IMRT for prostate cancer does not reduce the intrafraction movement of the prostate. Therefore, antiflatulent dietary advice is not recommended in clinical practice for this purpose. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. Show less
