Newborns can become critically ill from bacterial infections, a condition known as neonatal sepsis. The initial symptoms of neonatal sepsis are often subtle, leading to the treatment of thousands... Show moreNewborns can become critically ill from bacterial infections, a condition known as neonatal sepsis. The initial symptoms of neonatal sepsis are often subtle, leading to the treatment of thousands of newborns with antibiotics each year in the Netherlands. Preterm infants, who frequently require additional care, are particularly at risk for infection. However, the number of infants with a proven bacterial infection remains small. Antibiotics can disrupt the gut microbiota of newborns, potentially leading to colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). MDRO infections are more challenging to treat and may result in poorer outcomes. Reducing antibiotic use may potentially lead to a decrease in the colonization with MDRO and consequently, a reduction in infections caused by these organisms. Research described in this dissertation indicates that antibiotic treatment can be safely discontinued after 24 hours in certain groups of newborns, thereby potentially reducing the length of hospital admission. Additionally, the implementation of a novel laboratory test for meningitis may allow for shorter and lower-dose antibiotic treatments in newborns. Investigations into the transmission of MDROs in the neonatal ward have revealed that caring for newborns in single-patient rooms does not protect them from acquiring MDRO colonization. Show less
Background: COVID-19 infection prevention measures can negatively impact nursing home resi-dents' well-being. Society has been concerned about the imbalance between infection prevention and... Show moreBackground: COVID-19 infection prevention measures can negatively impact nursing home resi-dents' well-being. Society has been concerned about the imbalance between infection prevention and residents' well-being, and about nursing home residents' autonomy in COVID-19 policymaking.Objective: This study explores consensus among nursing home staff about which measures they found to be most important in contributing to preventing infections and to maintaining well-being of residents during COVID-19 outbreaks. In addition, this study explores the decision-making processes regarding COVID-19 measures and the involvement of residents or their representatives.Design: Mixed methods based on an online nominal group technique. Setting(s): Dutch nursing homes, June-November 2020.Participants: Managers, policy advisors, elderly care physicians, psychologists, a spiritual coun-selor, nurses, care assistants, and resident representatives (N = 35).Methods: Four panels from the viewpoint of infection prevention, and four panels from the viewpoint of well-being were performed with 3 to 7 participants per panel. Participants indi-vidually selected the measure they found most important, discussed these measures together in an online conversation, and rated the importance and urgency of these measures during COVID-19 outbreaks on a 5-point Likert scale. The measures that were rated as (very) important and (very) urgent by all members of that panel were defined as 'prioritized in consensus'. Panels also dis-cussed the decision-making process regarding COVID-19 measures and the involvement of resi-dents or their representatives. These conversations were transcribed verbatim and thematically coded using an inductive approach.Results: The infection prevention panels prioritized isolation measures; testing measures; testing and isolation combinations; use of personal protective equipment around (suspected) infected Show less
Objectives: To assess the value of screening for Clostridioides difficile colonization (CDC) at hospital admission in an endemic setting.Methods: A multi-centre study was conducted at four... Show moreObjectives: To assess the value of screening for Clostridioides difficile colonization (CDC) at hospital admission in an endemic setting.Methods: A multi-centre study was conducted at four hospitals located across the Netherlands. Newly admitted patients were screened for CDC. The risk of development of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) during admission and 1-year follow-up was assessed in patients with and without colonization. C. difficile isolates from patients with colonization were compared with isolates from incident CDI cases using core genome multi-locus sequence typing to determine whether onwards transmission had occurred.Results: CDC was present in 108 of 2211 admissions (4.9%), whereas colonization with a toxigenic strain (toxigenic Clostridoides difficile colonization [tCDC]) was present in 68 of 2211 admissions (3.1%). Among these 108 patients with colonization, diverse PCR ribotypes were found and no 'hypervirulent' PCR ribotype 027 (RT027) was detected (95% CI, 0-0.028). None of the patients with colonization developed CDI during admission (0/49; 95% CI, 0-0.073) or 1-year follow-up (0/38; 95% CI, 0-0.93). Core genome multi-locus sequence typing identified six clusters with genetically related isolates from patients with tCDC and CDI; however, in these clusters, only one possible transmission event from a patient with tCDC to a patient with CDI was identified based on epidemiological data.Conclusion: In this endemic setting with a low prevalence of 'hypervirulent' strains, screening for CDC at admission did not detect any patients with CDC who progressed to symptomatic CDI and detected only one possible transmission event from a patient with colonization to a patient with CDI. Thus, screening for CDC at admission is not useful in this setting. Monique J.T. Crobach, Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:891 & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
