The affordances of Open Educational Resources (OER) have resulted in various initiatives around the world, but most of them cease to exist once the initial project funding stops. Communities might... Show moreThe affordances of Open Educational Resources (OER) have resulted in various initiatives around the world, but most of them cease to exist once the initial project funding stops. Communities might be a means to create sustainable practices, yet, such communities can only function if their members perceive these communities as valuable. We applied the value creation framework of Wenger, Trayner, and De Laat to examine the value teachers ascribe to their engagement with an inter-institutional community on OER. In this community, 15 universities of applied sciences collaborated on sharing knowledge and resources across their institutional barriers. We collected data through user statistics, an online questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews. Major value creation occurred from teachers' personal needs, with dominant immediate and potential values. Findings on applied and realized values denote that it became easier for teachers to connect with peers, and to initiate collaboration projects across institutes. The framework we used is helpful to inform actions to further promote value creation in communities on OER. Recommendations relating to communities' aspirations, its relations with the wider organization, and adoption of OER are formulated to inform sustainable practices of inter-institutional communities. Show less
MOOCs are large-scale (Massive), Open to all, Online Courses. As universities invested substantially in MOOCs, (re)use in campus education manifested.In MOOC integration, it is currently unclear... Show moreMOOCs are large-scale (Massive), Open to all, Online Courses. As universities invested substantially in MOOCs, (re)use in campus education manifested.In MOOC integration, it is currently unclear how to design for high-quality teaching and learning. We questioned: 'What do medical MOOCs offer for integration into campus education?' (H2 and H3); ‘What does creating and integrating a MOOC entail?’ (H4 and H5); and 'How can learning in integrated MOOCs be supported?' (H6, H7 and H8). For high-quality teaching we conclude: (1) Medical MOOCs offer numerous opportunities for integration, including high-quality, innovative options; (2) Medical MOOCs do not share one profile for teaching modes or quality principles, and each MOOC should be examined; and (3) the practice of MOOC integration is not a simple process and requires time, several steps and specific knowledge. For high-quality learning we conclude: (1) Monitoring motivation and self-regulated learning is essential for support, and personalized motivation support can be linked to integration designs; (2) Trust in the teacher is important for students, and can be the key to promote motivation; and (3) Learning goal acceptance can bridge the gap between the desire to allow students to set personal goals and the practical preference to assign learning goals. Show less
