Purpose: Individuals with gray, blue, or green eyes have a higher chance of developing uveal melanoma (UM) than those with brown eyes. We wondered whether iris pigmentation might be related not... Show morePurpose: Individuals with gray, blue, or green eyes have a higher chance of developing uveal melanoma (UM) than those with brown eyes. We wondered whether iris pigmentation might be related not only to predisposition to UM but also to its behavior; therefore, we compared the clinical, histopathologic, and genetic characteristics of UM between eyes with different colors. Design: We determined iris color in a large cohort of patients enucleated for UM. Clinical and histopathologic tumor characteristics, chromosome status, and survival were compared among 3 groups on the basis of iris color. Participants: A total of 412 patients with choroidal/ciliary body UM, who had undergone primary enucleation at the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, between 1993 and 2019, were divided into 3 groups based on iris color: gray/blue, green/hazel, and brown. The validation cohort included 934 patients with choroidal/ciliary body UM treated at Wills Eye Hospital (WEH). Methods: Comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and genetic characteristics of UM in patients with different iris colors. Main Outcome Measures: Melanoma-related survival in UM patients, divided over 3 iris color groups, in relation to the tumor's chromosome 3 and 8q status. Results: Moderate and heavy tumor pigmentations were especially seen in eyes with a brown iris (P < 0.001). Survival did not differ between patients with different iris colors (P = 0.27); however, in patients with a light iris, copy number changes in chromosome 3 and 8q had a greater influence on survival than in patients with a dark iris. Likewise, chromosome 3 and chromosome 8q status affected survival more among patients with lightly pigmented tumors than in patients with heavily pigmented tumors. The WEH cohort similarly showed a greater influence of chromosome aberrations in light-eyed individuals. Conclusions: Although iris color by itself did not relate to UM-related survival, chromosome 3 and 8q aberrations had a larger influence on survival in patients with a light iris than those with a brown iris. This suggests a synergistic effect of iris pigmentation and chromosome status in the regulation of oncogenic behavior of UM. Iris color should be taken into consideration when calculating a patient's risk for developing metastases. (C) 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Show less
Purpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease and the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, with a high risk of metastases. Reliable prognostication systems are based on anatomic... Show morePurpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease and the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, with a high risk of metastases. Reliable prognostication systems are based on anatomic features, as in the tumor-node-metastasis staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system, or on genetic information, as in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) system. Prior evidence suggests that combining both systems may be beneficial. We evaluated the benefit of combining the TCGA and AJCC systems in a large cohort of patients.Design: Retrospective case series of patients with UM.Participants: Nine hundred seventy-nine patients with a choroidal or ciliary body melanoma treated at the Wills Eye Hospital between 1998 and 2020, 94% of whom received eye-sparing treatment.Methods: Tumors were classified into 4 TCGA groups based on chromosome copy number: A (disomy 3, normal 8q), B (disomy 3, any 8q gain), C (monosomy 3, 1 extra copy of 8q), and D (monosomy 3, multiple 8q gain). The eighth edition of the AJCC staging manual was used for AJCC staging. Cox regression and the log-rank test were used for survival analysis.Main Outcome Measure: Metastasis-free survival.Results: Combining information of the 2 systems improved prognostication in intermediate groups: in TCGA group C, we saw an increased rate of metastasis in AJCC stage III (28%) compared with stage 11 (8.9%); the same was seen in AJCC stage II, going from TCGA group C (8.9%) to group D (46%), and in AJCC stage III, going from group C (28%) to group D (49%). In patients with AJCC stage II or III disease, loss of chromosome 3 and gain of 8q (TCGA groups C and D) significantly worsened the prognosis, with multiple 8q gain (TCGA group D) having a greater impact.Conclusions: Combining information from AJCC stages and TCGA groups yields a better predictive power even in this set of relatively small tumors. We propose that physicians take both systems into account whenever possible, especially in moderate-risk groups. (C) 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Show less
Recent developments in oncology have led to a better molecular and cellular understanding of cancer, and the introduction of novel therapies. Conjunctival melanoma (CoM) is a rare but potentially... Show moreRecent developments in oncology have led to a better molecular and cellular understanding of cancer, and the introduction of novel therapies. Conjunctival melanoma (CoM) is a rare but potentially devastating disease. A better understanding of CoM, leading to the development of novel therapies, is urgently needed. CoM is characterized by mutations that have also been identified in cutaneous melanoma, e.g. in BRAF, NRAS and TERT. These mutations are distinct from the mutations found in uveal melanoma (UM), affecting genes such as GNAQ, GNA11, and BAP1. Targeted therapies that are successful in cutaneous melanoma may therefore be useful in CoM. A recent breakthrough in the treatment of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma was the development of immunotherapy. While immunotherapy is currently sparsely effective in intraocular tumours such as UM, the similarities between CoM and cutaneous melanoma (including in their immunological tumour micro environment) provide hope for the application of immunotherapy in CoM, and preliminary clinical data are indeed emerging to support this use. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge regarding CoM, with a focus on the genetic and immunologic understanding. We elaborate on the distinct position of CoM in contrast to other types of melanoma, and explain how new insights in the pathophysiology of this disease guide the development of new, personalized, treatments. Show less
Purpose: This study was designed to identify mitochondrial (mt) DNA variations in primary and metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) cell lines and their relation with cell metabolism to gain insight into... Show morePurpose: This study was designed to identify mitochondrial (mt) DNA variations in primary and metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) cell lines and their relation with cell metabolism to gain insight into metastatic progression.Method: The entire mtDNA genomes were sequenced using Sanger sequencing from two primary UM cell lines (92.1 and MEL270) and two cell lines (OMM2.3 and OMM2.5) derived from liver metastases of the MEL270 patient. The mtDNA copy numbers determined by the ratio of nDNA versus mtDNA. qRT-PCR was used to evaluate expression levels of mitochondrial biogenesis genes.Results: Sequencing showed that cell line MEL270 and metastases-derived OMM2.3 and OMM2.5 cell lines had homoplasmic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) representing J1c7a haplogroup, whereas 92.1 cells had mtDNA H31a haplogroup. mtDNA copy numbers were significantly higher in primary cell lines. The metastatic UM cells showed down-regulation of POLG, TFAM, NRF-1 and SIRT1 compared to their primary MEL270 cells. PGC-1 alpha was downregulated in 92.1 and upregulated in MEL270, OMM2.3 and OMM2.5.Conclusions: Our finding suggests that within metastatic cells, the heteroplasmic SNPs, copy numbers and mitochondrial biogenesis genes are modulated differentially compared to their primary UM cells. Therefore, investigating pathogenic mtDNA variants associated with cancer metabolic susceptibility may provide future therapeutic strategies in metastatic UM. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. Show less
