ObjectiveThe choice between external ventricular drain (EVD) and intraparenchymal monitor (IPM) for managing intracranial pressure in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) patients... Show moreObjectiveThe choice between external ventricular drain (EVD) and intraparenchymal monitor (IPM) for managing intracranial pressure in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate factors associated with receiving EVD versus IPM and to compare outcomes and clinical management between EVD and IPM patients.MethodsAdult msTBI patients at 2 similar academic institutions were identified. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with receiving EVD versus IPM (model 1) and to compare EVD versus IPM in relation to patient outcomes after controlling for potential confounders (model 2), through odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsOf 521 patients, 167 (32.1%) had EVD and 354 (67.9%) had IPM. Mean age, sex, and Injury Severity Score were comparable between groups. Epidural hemorrhage (EDH) (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.85), greater midline shift (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.98), and the hospital with higher volume (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09–0.22) were independently associated with lower odds of receiving an EVD whereas patients needing a craniectomy were more likely to receive an EVD (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.12–3.73). EVD patients received more intense medical treatment requiring hyperosmolar therapy compared to IPM patients (64.1% vs. 40.1%). No statistically significant differences were found in patient outcomes.ConclusionsWhile EDH, greater midline shift, and hospital with larger patient volume were associated with receiving an IPM, the need for a craniectomy was associated with receiving an EVD. EVD patients received different clinical management than IPM patients with no significant differences in patient outcomes. Show less
Solinge, T.S. van; Muskens, I.S.; Kavouridis, V.K.; Gormley, W.B.; Mekary, R.A.; Broekman, M.L.D.; Arnaout, O. 2020
Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is an independent poor prognostic factor in subarachnoid and intra-parenchymal hemorrhage. The use of intraventricular fibrinolytics (IVF) has long been debated,... Show moreIntraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is an independent poor prognostic factor in subarachnoid and intra-parenchymal hemorrhage. The use of intraventricular fibrinolytics (IVF) has long been debated, and its exact effects on outcomes are unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to assess the impact of IVF after non-traumatic IVH on mortality, functional outcome, intracranial bleeding, ventriculitis, time until clearance of third and fourth ventricles, obstruction of external ventricular drains (EVD), and shunt dependency. Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 1020 patients. IVF was associated with lower mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.72), fewer EVD obstructions (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22-0.74), and a shorter time until clearance of the ventricles (median difference [MD] - 4.05 days; 95% CI - 5.52 to - 2.57). There was no difference in good functional outcome, RR 1.41 (95% CI 0.98-2.03), or shunt dependency, RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.70-1.22). Correction for publication bias predicted an increased risk of intracranial bleeding, RR 1.67 (95% CI 1.01-2.74) and a lower risk of ventriculitis, RR 0.68 (95% CI 0.45-1.03) in IVH patients treated with IVF. IVF was associated with improved survival, faster clearance of blood from the ventricles and fewer drain obstructions, but further research is warranted to elucidate the effects on ventriculitis, long-term functional outcomes, and re-hemorrhage. Show less
