BackgroundManagement of narcolepsy includes behavior strategies and symptomatic pharmacological treatment. In the general population, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common in... Show moreBackgroundManagement of narcolepsy includes behavior strategies and symptomatic pharmacological treatment. In the general population, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common in Europe (30%), also in chronic neurological disorders (10–20%). The aim of our study was to evaluate frequency and characteristics of CAM use in German narcolepsy patients.MethodsDemographic, disease-related data frequency and impact of CAM use were assessed in an online survey. Commonly used CAM treatments were predetermined in a questionnaire based on the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and included the domains: (1) alternative medical systems; (2) biologically based therapies; (3) energy therapies; (4) mind-body interventions, and (5) manipulative and body-based therapies.ResultsWe analyzed data from 254 questionnaires. Fifteen percent of participants were at the time of survey administration using CAM for narcolepsy, and an additional 18% of participants reported past use. Among the 33% of CAM users, vitamins/trace elements (54%), homoeopathy (48%) and meditation (39%) were used most frequently. 54% of the users described CAM as helpful. CAM users more frequently described having side effects from their previous medication (p = 0.001), and stated more frequently not to comply with pharmacological treatment than non-CAM users (21% vs. 8%; p = 0.024).DiscussionThe use of CAM in narcolepsy patients is common. Our results indicate that many patients still feel the need to improve their symptoms, sleepiness and psychological well-being in particular. Frequent medication change, the experience of adverse events and low adherence to physician-recommended medication appears more frequent in CAM users. The impact of CAM however seems to be limited. Show less
This thesis covers several steps in the process of validating the Sustained Attention to Response Task as a measure of vigilance in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness. It comprises a review... Show moreThis thesis covers several steps in the process of validating the Sustained Attention to Response Task as a measure of vigilance in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness. It comprises a review of the currently circulation definitions of vigilance and a proposal for a covering definition; an extension of previous vigilance measurements in narcolepsy and other patient groups with excessive daytime sleepiness; an assessment of factors possibly influencing SART results, such as task repetition, napping, time of day, and test instruction; and the value of the SART as a treatment efficacy measure in narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnoea. Show less
The aim of this European initiative is to facilitate a structured discussion to improve the next edition of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD), particularly the chapter on... Show moreThe aim of this European initiative is to facilitate a structured discussion to improve the next edition of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD), particularly the chapter on central disorders of hypersomnolence.The ultimate goal for a sleep disorders classification is to be based on the underlying neurobiological causes of the disorders with clear implication for treatment or, ideally, prevention and or healing. The current ICSD classification, published in 2014, inevitably has important shortcomings, largely reflecting the lack of knowledge about the precise neurobiological mechanisms underlying the majority of sleep disorders we currently delineate. Despite a clear rationale for the present structure, there remain important limitations that make it difficult to apply in routine clinical practice. Moreover, there are indications that the current structure may even prevent us from gaining relevant new knowledge to better understand certain sleep disorders and their neurobiological causes.We suggest the creation of a new consistent, complaint driven, hierarchical classification for central disorders of hypersomnolence; containing levels of certainty, and giving diagnostic tests, particularly the MSLT, a weighting based on its specificity and sensitivity in the diagnostic context.We propose and define three diagnostic categories (with levels of certainty): 1/"Narcolepsy" 2/"Idiopathic hypersomnia", 3/"Idiopathic excessive sleepiness" (with subtypes). (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. Show less
Study objectives: Sleep state misperception is common in various sleep disorders, especially in chronic insomnia with a prevalence ranging between 9-50%. Most prior studies used nocturnal... Show moreStudy objectives: Sleep state misperception is common in various sleep disorders, especially in chronic insomnia with a prevalence ranging between 9-50%. Most prior studies used nocturnal polysomnography (PSG) for the identification of sleep state misperception during nighttime. Our objective was to assess sleep state misperception during daytime in people with sleep disorders with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS).Methods: In this prospective observational study, we assessed the occurrence of, and factors influencing sleep state misperception in consecutive patients undergoing a routine multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) in a tertiary sleep-wake centre included between 2014 and 2017. Mixed models were applied to assess the influence of patients' clinical data on sleep state perception.Results: People with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1, n = 33) and type 2 (NT2, n = 14), idiopathic hypersomnia (IH, n = 56), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA, n = 31) and insufficient sleep syndrome (ISS, n = 31) were included. The prevalence of both classical and reverse sleep state misperception did not differ between the sleep disorders (mean 25%, range 8-37%) after correction for sleep stage, sleep onset latency and age. Longer sleep onset latency and reaching only non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stage 1 were significant predictors for classical sleep state misperception.Conclusions: Sleep state misperception is common in people with NT1 and NT2, IH, OSA, and ISS. Classical sleep state misperception is more frequent in patients with longer sleep onset latencies who only reach non-REM sleep stage 1 during a nap. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Show less
Objective: Solriamfetol (formerly JZP-110), a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved in the US to improve wakefulness in adults with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with... Show moreObjective: Solriamfetol (formerly JZP-110), a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved in the US to improve wakefulness in adults with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/d) or obstructive sleep apnea (37.5-150 mg/d). In a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial in participants with narcolepsy, effects of solriamfetol on functional status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and work productivity were evaluated.Methods: Participants with narcolepsy (N = 239) were randomized to solriamfetol 75, 150, or 300 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks. Outcome measures included the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire short version (FOSQ-10), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire for Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP). A mixed-effects model with repeated measures was used for comparisons vs placebo.Results: At week 12, solriamfetol increased FOSQ-10 total score, with greatest mean difference from placebo (95% CI) at 300 mg (1.45 [0.31, 2.59]). On SF-36v2, improvements vs placebo were observed in physical component summary scores (300 mg: 2.22 [0.04, 4.41]) and subscales of role physical, general health, and vitality. On WPAI:SHP, solriamfetol 150 mg reduced overall work impairment vs placebo (-15.5 [-29.52, -1.47]), and 150 and 300 mg reduced activity impairment vs placebo (-10.05 [-19.48, -0.62] and -13.49 [-23.19, -3.78], respectively). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild or moderate in severity. Common TEAEs were headache, nausea, decreased appetite, nasopharyngitis, dry mouth, and anxiety.Conclusions: Solriamfetol improved measures of functional status, HRQoL, and work productivity, particularly at the 150- and 300-mg doses. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Show less
The thesis “Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease” is part of the PROPARK study, a longitudinal cohort study of approximately 400 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), who are profiled on... Show moreThe thesis “Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease” is part of the PROPARK study, a longitudinal cohort study of approximately 400 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), who are profiled on genotype, phenotype, disability, and global outcomes of health, using valid and reliable assessment instruments for PD. The aims of this thesis were to characterize the non-motor domains important in PD such as olfactory, autonomic, sleep, cognitive, and psychiatric problems. Additionally, their relations with other domains of the disease were evaluated on a cross-sectional level, as well as their impact on disability and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, the phenotypic characteristics of mutation carriers in the cohort were evaluated. The most important conclusions from this thesis are: 1. Non-motor symptoms are frequently present in patients with PD 2. Non-motor symptoms are related to each other 3. Non-motor symptoms greatly influence quality of life in patients with PD The results as described in this thesis will serve as guideline for future research which will be aimed at underlying disease mechanisms. Show less
