The traditional concept of employment, which involved fixed, permanent contracts, with full time hours and security in work has gradually been replaced by a ‘neoliberal’ model of employment that... Show moreThe traditional concept of employment, which involved fixed, permanent contracts, with full time hours and security in work has gradually been replaced by a ‘neoliberal’ model of employment that prioritises the development of competitive labour markets through increased flexibility in work. This shift has resulted in increasing levels of ‘precarious’ work: forms on non-standard employment that places the individual in a situation where they have little security in work or power over their working situation. Examples of precarious employment include platform work, zero-hour and on-demand contracts, the repeated use of temporary/short-term contracts, and bogus/false self-employment.The European Precariat asks what level of protection is available to EU migrant workers engaged in precarious employment, who must navigate complex national migration and social security rules linked to their employment status. The thesis assesses how economic and political changes affect the constitutional and political limitations of European integration; how the legal framework applicable to precarious workers risks creating gaps in the law and excluding them from certain protections; and finally suggests how EU migrant workers engaged in precarious work can be better protected under EU law while adhering to the economic, political, and constitutional limitations of the legal system. Show less
This edited Working Paper addresses three fundamental questions concerning EU External Action after the Lisbon Treaty: the institutional position and allegiance of the newly-established European... Show moreThis edited Working Paper addresses three fundamental questions concerning EU External Action after the Lisbon Treaty: the institutional position and allegiance of the newly-established European External Action Service, the future of the ‘left out’ Directorate-General for Trade and the Common Commercial Policy, and the protection of EU citizens abroad. These enquires are prompted by both an institutional innovation – the launch of the EEAS – as well as by a number of substantive changes to the legal framework of EU External Action. An ambitious agenda has been inserted into the primary law, around which the Union institutions and Member States are to rally. It is in turn the raison d’être of the EEAS to foster the ensuing need for consistency, as well as to provide impetus to the EU’s external action. Structurally, it is in itself a sui generis institution composed of officials from the Commission, the Council and the Member States. This raises a number of fundamental questions that go well beyond those concerning which person is going to be the new EU ambassador in Washington or Beijing. Above all, can these substantive and institutional innovations live up to the grand ambitions of the peculiar entity that is the EU? What old problems does it purport to solve, and what are the new problems it is likely to create? Essentially, to which extent does bundling the external objectives in the Treaties as well as pooling together the institutional resources in Brussels and the delegations actually render the EU an ‘ever-closer’ actor in the world? Show less
