Acromegaly is a rare disease and thus challenging to accurately quantify epidemiologically. In this comprehensive literature review, we compare different approaches to studying acromegaly from an... Show moreAcromegaly is a rare disease and thus challenging to accurately quantify epidemiologically. In this comprehensive literature review, we compare different approaches to studying acromegaly from an epidemiological perspective and describe the temporal evolution of the disease pertaining to epidemiological variables, clinical presentation and mortality. We present updated epidemiological data from the population-based Danish cohort of patients with acromegaly (AcroDEN), along with meta-analyses of existing estimates from around the world.Based on this, we conclude that the incidence, prevalence and age at acromegaly diagnosis are all steadily increasing, but with considerable variation between studies. An increased number of incidental cases may contribute to the increase in incidence and age at diagnosis, respectively. The clinical features at presentation are trending toward a milder disease phenotype at diagnosis, and advances in therapeutic options have reduced the mortality of patients with acromegaly to a level similar to that of the general population. Moreover, the underlying cause of death has shifted from cardiovascular to malignant neoplastic diseases. Show less
Purpose Recent data have shown a decreasing overall mortality in acromegaly over the last decades. However, cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality still appear to be increased. Our aim was... Show morePurpose Recent data have shown a decreasing overall mortality in acromegaly over the last decades. However, cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality still appear to be increased. Our aim was to obtain updated epidemiological data from Norway in a clinically well-defined cohort with complete register-based follow-up.Methods Patients diagnosed with acromegaly from South-Eastern Norway between 1999-2019 (n = 262) and age and sex matched population controls (1:100) were included (n = 26,200). Mortality and cancer data were obtained from the Norwegian Cause of Death and Cancer Registry. Mortality and cancer incidence were compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression; we report hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).Results Median age at diagnosis was 48.0 years (interquartile range (IQR): 37.6-58.0). Mean annual acromegaly incidence rate was 4.7 (95% CI 4.2-5.3) cases/10(6) person-years, and the point prevalence (2019) was 83 (95% CI 72.6-93.5) cases/10(6) persons. Overall mortality was not increased in acromegaly, HR 0.8 (95% CI 0.5-1.4), cancer-specific and cardiovascular-specific mortality was also not increased (HR: 0.7 (95% CI 0.3-1.8) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.3-2.5) respectively). The HR for all cancers was 1.45 (1.0-2.1; p = 0.052).Conclusion In this large cohort study, covering the period 1999-2019, patients were treated with individualized multimodal management. Mortality was not increased compared to the general population and comparable with recent registry studies from the Nordic countries and Europe. Overall cancer risk was slightly, but not significantly increased in the patients. Show less
Heus, E. de; Duijts, S.F.A.; Zwan, J.M. van der; Kapiteijn, E.; Dijkum, E.J.M.N. van; Herpen, C.M.L. van; Merkx, M.A.W. 2022
Introduction: Epidemiological discrepancies exist between rare and common can-cers. The aim of this population-based study was to compare rare versus common adult solid cancers in the Netherlands,... Show moreIntroduction: Epidemiological discrepancies exist between rare and common can-cers. The aim of this population-based study was to compare rare versus common adult solid cancers in the Netherlands, by providing incidence, prevalence and survival rates, evaluating trends in survival and comparing individual entities within domains and families.Methods: All adult patients with malignant solid cancers in the Netherlands between 1995 and 2019 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were collected, and relative survival and survival trends were ana-lysed.Results: A total of 170,628 patients with rare adult solid cancers and 806,023 patients with common adult solid cancers were included. Rare cancers accounted for 18% of all cancer di-agnoses (mean incidence), and 15% of the total ten-year cancer prevalence during 2010-2019. Overall 5-year survival was worse for rare cancers than for common cancers (52.0% versus 68.7%). Between 1995-1999 and 2015-2019, 5-year survival rates for rare cancers increased to a lesser extent (from 46.2% to 52.6%, i.e. 6.4%) than for common cancers (56.9% Show less
Fernandez, J.; Prado, V.; Trebicka, J.; Amoros, A.; Gustot, T.; Wiest, R.; ... ; European Fdn Study Chronic Liver 2019
