For part I population-based data from the national cancer registries of Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden was used. In all countries, the use of chemotherapy increased with stage and... Show moreFor part I population-based data from the national cancer registries of Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden was used. In all countries, the use of chemotherapy increased with stage and decreased with age. Also, 30-day and one-year excess mortality decreased over the years for colon and rectal cancer. After surviving the first postoperative year, the survival of surgically treated older patients aligned with their younger counterparts, except for patients with stage III disease. Part II describes the results of the analyses of the RAPIDO trial. DRTF decreased from 30% in the standard-care group to 24% in the experimental group at 3 years after randomisation, mainly due to a decrease in DM, which is probably due to better compliance preoperatively and perhaps due the earlier treatment of micrometastases in the treatment process. Although patients with DM in the experimental group had worse survival compared to patients in the standard-care group, the cumulative probability of overall survival remained comparable for both treatment groups. If the patients with a complete response can be identified during reassessment after neoadjuvant therapy, surgery may be omitted, a W&W after a cCR with an appropriate follow-up has no additional oncological risk in young patients compared to older patients (part III). This opens the door for potential organ preservation. Show less
Background: A decade ago, it was demonstrated that the difference in survival between older patients and younger patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) was mainly due to mortality in the first... Show moreBackground: A decade ago, it was demonstrated that the difference in survival between older patients and younger patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) was mainly due to mortality in the first postoperative year. Over the last few years, improvements -especially in perioperative care-have increased survival. The current research investigates whether a survival gap between younger and older patients with CRC still exists on a national level in four European countries. Methods: Population-based data from Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden were collected from patients that underwent surgical resection for primary stage I-III CRC between 2007 and 2016. Relative survival and conditional relative survival (CS), with the condition of surviving the first postoperative year, were calculated for colon and rectal cancer separately, stratified for country and age category (< 65, 65-75, >= 75 years). In addition, relative excess risk of death (RER) was estimated, and one-year excess mortality was calculated. Results: Data of 206,024 patients were analyzed. In general, compared to patients < 65 years, patients >= 75 years had a worse survival during the first year after surgery, which was most pronounced in Belgium (RER colon cancer 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-2.8] and RER rectal cancer 2.6 [95% CI 2.3-2.9]). After surviving the first year, CS was mostly not statistically different between patients < 65 years and patients >= 75 years with stage I-II, with the exception of stage II colon cancer in Belgium. However, CS remained worse in the largest part of the patients & GE;75 years with stage III colon or rectal cancer (except for rectal cancer in Norway). Conclusions: Although differences exist between the countries, the survival gap between young and older patients is based mainly on early mortality and remains only for stage III disease after surviving the first year. Show less
