BackgroundHormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2/neu-negative breast cancers have a sustained risk of recurrence up to 20 years from diagnosis. TEAM (Tamoxifen, Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational) is... Show moreBackgroundHormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2/neu-negative breast cancers have a sustained risk of recurrence up to 20 years from diagnosis. TEAM (Tamoxifen, Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational) is a large, multi-country, phase III trial that randomized 9776 women for the use of hormonal therapy. Of these 2754 were Dutch patients. The current study aims for the first time to correlate the ten-year clinical outcomes with predictions by CanAssist Breast (CAB)—a prognostic test developed in South East Asia, on a Dutch sub-cohort that participated in the TEAM. The total Dutch TEAM cohort and the current Dutch sub-cohort were almost similar with respect to patient age and tumor anatomical features.MethodsOf the 2754 patients from the Netherlands, which are part of the original TEAM trial, 592 patients’ samples were available with Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). The risk stratification of CAB was correlated with outcomes of patients using logistic regression approaches entailing Kaplan–Meier survival curves, univariate and multivariate cox-regression hazards model. We used hazard ratios (HRs), the cumulative incidence of distant metastasis/death due to breast cancer (DM), and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFi) for assessment.ResultsOut of 433 patients finally included, the majority, 68.4% had lymph node-positive disease, while only a minority received chemotherapy (20.8%) in addition to endocrine therapy. CAB stratified 67.5% of the total cohort as low-risk [DM = 11.5% (95% CI, 7.6–15.2)] and 32.5% as high-risk [DM = 30.2% (95% CI, 21.9–37.6)] with an HR of 2.90 (95% CI, 1.75–4.80; P < 0.001) at ten years. CAB risk score was an independent prognostic factor in the consideration of clinical parameters in multivariate analysis. At ten years, CAB high-risk had the worst DRFi of 69.8%, CAB low-risk in the exemestane monotherapy arm had the best DRFi of 92.7% [vs CAB high-risk, HR, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.11–0.43), P < 0.001], and CAB low-risk in the sequential arm had a DRFi of 84.2% [vs CAB high-risk, HR, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.28–0.82), P = 0.009].ConclusionsCost-effective CAB is a statistically robust prognostic and predictive tool for ten-year DM for postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2−, early breast cancer. CAB low-risk patients who received exemestane monotherapy had an excellent ten-year DRFi. Show less
Introduction: Studies investigating the long-term effects of breast cancer treatment on cognition in older women with breast cancer are lacking, even though preserving cognition is highly valued by... Show moreIntroduction: Studies investigating the long-term effects of breast cancer treatment on cognition in older women with breast cancer are lacking, even though preserving cognition is highly valued by the older population. Specifically, concerns have been raised regarding the detrimental effects of endocrine therapy (ET) on cognition. Therefore, we investigated cogni-tive functioning over time and predictors for cognitive decline in older women treated for early breast cancer.Methods: We prospectively enrolled Dutch women aged >70 years with stage I-III breast can-cer in the observational CLIMB study. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was performed before ET initiation and after 9, 15 and 27 months. Longitudinal MMSE scores were analysed and stratified for ET. Linear mixed models were used to identify possible pre-dictors of cognitive decline.Results: Among the 273 participants, the mean age was 76 years (standard deviation 5), and 48% received ET. The mean baseline MMSE score was 28.2 (standard deviation 1.9). Cogni-tion did not decline to clinically meaningful differences, irrespective of ET. MMSE scores of women with pre-treatment cognitive impairments slightly improved over time (significant interaction terms) in the entire cohort and in women receiving ET. High age, low educational level and impaired mobility were independently associated with declining MMSE scores over time, although the declines were not clinically meaningful.Conclusion: Cognition of older women with early breast cancer did not decline in the first two years after treatment initiation, irrespective of ET. Our findings suggest that the fear of declining cognition does not justify the de-escalation of breast cancer treatment in older women. 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
Purpose: Side effects are the main reason for discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine geriatric predictors of treatment discontinuation... Show morePurpose: Side effects are the main reason for discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older adults. The aim of this study was to examine geriatric predictors of treatment discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy within the first 2 years after initiation, and to study the association between early discontinuation and functional status and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Patients aged >= 70 years with stage I-III breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary endpoint was discontinuation of endocrine therapy within 2 years. Risk factors for discontinuation were assessed using univariate logistic regression models. Linear mixed models were used to assess QoL and functional status over time. Results: Overall, 258 patients were included, of whom 36% discontinued therapy within 2 years after initiation. No geriatric predictive factors for treatment discontinuation were found. Tumour stage was inversely associated with early discontinuation. Patients who discontinued had a worse breast cancer-specific QoL (b = - 4.37; 95% CI - 7.96 to - 0.78; p = 0.017) over the first 2 years, in particular on the future perspective subscale (b = - 11.10; 95% CI - 18.80 to - 3.40; p = 0.005), which did not recover after discontinuation. Treatment discontinuation was not associated with functional improvement. Conclusion: A large proportion of older patients discontinue adjuvant endocrine treatment within 2 years after initiation, but geriatric characteristics are not predictive of early discontinuation of treatment. Discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy did not positively affect QoL and functional status, which implies that the observed poorer QoL in this group is probably not caused by adverse effects of endocrine therapy. Show less
Partridge, A.H.; Niman, S.M.; Ruggeri, M.; Peccatori, F.A.; Azim, H.A.; Colleoni, M.; ... ; Pagani, O. 2021
Background: Premenopausal women with early hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer receive 5-10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) during which pregnancy is contraindicated and... Show moreBackground: Premenopausal women with early hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer receive 5-10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) during which pregnancy is contraindicated and fertility may wane. The POSITIVE study investigates the impact of temporary ET interruption to allow pregnancy. Methods: POSITIVE enrolled women with stage I-III HR + early breast cancer, <42 years, who had received 18-30 months of adjuvant ET and wished to interrupt ET for pregnancy. Treatment interruption for up to 2 years was permitted to allow pregnancy, delivery and breastfeeding, followed by ET resumption to complete the planned duration. Findings: From 12/2014 to 12/2019, 518 women were enrolled at 116 institutions/20 countries/4 continents. At enrolment, the median age was 37 years and 74.9 % were nulliparous. Fertility preservation was used by 51.5 % of women. 93.2 % of patients had stage I/II disease, 66.0 % were node-negative, 54.7 % had breast conserving surgery, 61.9 % had received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy. Tamoxifen alone was the most prescribed ET (41.8 %), followed by tamoxifen + ovarian function suppression (OFS) (35.4 %). A greater proportion of North American women were <35 years at enrolment (42.7 %), had mastectomy (59.0 %) and received tamoxifen alone (59.8 %). More Asian women were nulliparous (81.0 %), had node negative disease (76.2%) and received tamoxifen + OFS (56.0 %). More European women had received chemotherapy (69.3 %). Interpretation: The characteristics of participants in the POSITIVE study provide insights to which patients and doctors considered it acceptable to interrupt ET to pursue pregnancy. Similarities and variations from a regional, sociodemographic, disease and treatment standpoint suggest specific sociocultural attitudes across the world. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Show less
PurposeIn breast cancer, hormone receptor (HR) status is generally a qualitative measure; positive or negative. Quantitatively measured oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) are... Show morePurposeIn breast cancer, hormone receptor (HR) status is generally a qualitative measure; positive or negative. Quantitatively measured oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) are frequently proposed prognostic and predictive markers, some guidelines even provide different treatment options for patients with strong versus weak expression.AimTo evaluate quantitative HR load assessed by immunohistochemistry as a prognostic and predictive measure in stage 1-3 breast cancer.MethodsWe reviewed all the available literature on quantitatively measured HRs using immunohistochemistry.ResultsAll included studies (n=19) comprised a cohort of 30,754 patients. Only 2 out of 17 studies found a clear correlation between higher quantitative ER and better disease outcome. Only one trial examined quantitative ER both as prognostic and predictive marker and found no association between ER% and survival. Ten studies examined quantitative PR load, only two of those found a significant correlation between higher PR load and better disease outcome. Two trials examined quantitative PR both as prognostic and predictive marker, neither found any association between PR% and disease outcome.ConclusionsThere is no clear evidence for using quantitatively assessed ER and PR as prognostic nor predictive marker in patients with stage 1-3 breast cancer. We recommend only using a qualitative HR status in future guidelines and treatment considerations. Show less
Upon activation by estrogen, the Estrogen Receptor binds the chromatin and influences gene transcription. This ultimately leads to cell proliferation. About 75% of breast cancer patients... Show moreUpon activation by estrogen, the Estrogen Receptor binds the chromatin and influences gene transcription. This ultimately leads to cell proliferation. About 75% of breast cancer patients express this hormonal receptor. These patients are often treated with tamoxifen, which competitively inhibits the proliferative effects of estrogen in breast cancer cells. While tamoxifen inhibits the tumor growth of breast cancer, its effects in other Estrogen Receptor-positive tissues vary, as reviewed in chapter 1. Its most adverse side-effect is that it increases the risk for endometrial cancer. Chapters 2 and 3 describe the effects of tamoxifen on the DNA binding sites of the Estrogen Receptor in tamoxifen-associated endometrial cancer, and the similarities of these binding sites with those found in breast cancer. Unfortunately, there are Estrogen Receptor-positive breast cancer patients who do not respond to hormonal treatment. Chapter 4 reveals a key-role for activating transcription factor 2 on tamoxifen’s inhibitory response on cell proliferation. Chapter 5 discusses components of the Estrogen Receptor pathway and highlights their potential as biomarkers in hormonal response therapy. Finally, chapter 6 provides new questions invoked by this thesis, and discusses the importance of unraveling the Estrogen Receptor pathway in multiple tissues in order to develop tailor-made treatments. Show less
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed type of cancer among women, both in developed and developing regions. The majority of patients is postmenopausal at diagnosis and has hormone... Show moreBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed type of cancer among women, both in developed and developing regions. The majority of patients is postmenopausal at diagnosis and has hormone sensitive tumours, implying that patients may benefit from endocrine therapy, both in curative and in metastatic setting. In the last twenty-five years, the treatment of patients with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer has largely changed as more treatment options became available, while over the last decade more tailored treatment was aimed at. This has resulted in an improved prognosis.2-4 Nevertheless, part of breast cancer patients will develop recurrent disease, especially late recurrences can occur in hormone sensitive disease while the various therapies may be associated with side effects which can affect quality of life. The research described in this thesis was designed to gain further insight in optimal treatment of early breast cancer patients, especially in postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive tumours. Show less
Fontein, D.B.Y.; Charehbili, A.; Nortier, J.W.R.; Kranenbarg, E.M.K.; Kroep, J.R.; Putter, H.; ... ; Velde, C.J.H. van de 2014
Molecular understanding of estrogen receptor signalling, phosphorytion and its role in resistance to endocrine (tamoxifen) therapy in breast cancer patients
