There is a growing awareness that research of the etiology of depressive and anxiety disorders has been hampered by their strictly categorical definition in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ... Show moreThere is a growing awareness that research of the etiology of depressive and anxiety disorders has been hampered by their strictly categorical definition in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). The DSM uses a syndrome approach, which __ although beneficial for standardization - has inherent problems that make it suboptimal for research: high rates of (artificial) comorbidity, diagnostic heterogeneity and the unrealistic assumption of discontinuity between ill and healthy. A dimensional approach that focusses on the relative severity of continuous symptom domains could be more optimal but measurement and the added value of such dimensions has been debated. Therefore, this dissertation was aimed to investigate (1) the internal validity and possibility to measure dimensions and (2) their added value in etiological and clinical research. The results showed that measurement of dimensions can be optimized using self-report questionnaires. In addition, dimensions were shown to have added value in etiological and clinical research. Because of their specific and continuous nature, dimensions could be used to uncover symptom-specific and/or non-linear association. Together, the results suggest that dimensions of depression and anxiety have internal and external validity and have the potential to improve the psychiatric research. Show less
Background: It is assumed that the endogenous subtype of depression is a form of depression with various biological abnormalities and a genetic predisposition. The clinical picture rarely shows... Show moreBackground: It is assumed that the endogenous subtype of depression is a form of depression with various biological abnormalities and a genetic predisposition. The clinical picture rarely shows prior stress and/or an abnormal personality. According to the DSM-IV, this subtype is reproduced as the melancholic subtype, but this subtype has insufficient external validity. This is mainly due to the specific operational method used in the categorical DSM system. Question: Reformulating the melancholic subtype by means of a multidimensional approach. This would be formulated and tested on different external validity levels, which should result in better external validity. An improvement at one level of investigation could lead to improvements in relation to other levels, and vice versa. The development of diagnostic concepts could therefore progress according to a cyclic validation process. For this reason, we also investigated whether a later-found subgroup with above-normal plasma AVP could be a more useful endophenotypic parameter as well. This subtype was also tested on different external validation levels. Results: We found a two-dimensionally based, highly anxious retarded subcategory, with better external validation criteria than the melancholic subtype. We also found a second subtype, namely above normal AVP depression, that also had better external validation criteria. Show less
