Cholesterol-lowering medications aim to prevent cardiovascular events, caused by arteriosclerosis. Older adults (75 years and older) have a high cardiovascular risk based on age alone, and it is... Show moreCholesterol-lowering medications aim to prevent cardiovascular events, caused by arteriosclerosis. Older adults (75 years and older) have a high cardiovascular risk based on age alone, and it is estimated that 1 in 3 older adults use cholesterol-lowering medication. The vast majority (96% in the Netherlands) use a statin.The appropriateness of cholesterol-lowering medication for older adults is under debate. While there is strong evidence for the benefits of statins in relatively healthy older adults with a history of cardiovascular disease, for other groups the evidence is less convincing. Also, statins are associated with hindering side effects. In this thesis, various aspects of the appropriateness of cholesterol-lowering medication for older adults were studied, using different research designs. Five recurrent themes were of the utmost importance in the assessment of the appropriateness of cholesterol-lowering medication in older adults; 1) the individual context of a patient, 2) life expectancy, 3) hindering side effects, 4) cardiovascular history, and 5) the complexity of health problems. Based in these five themes, five key questions were distilled that can be used in a systematic evaluation of the appropriateness of cholesterol- lowering treatment for an individual patient. Show less
Brokaar, E.J.; Visser, L.E.; Bos, F. van den; Portielje, J.E.A. 2023
Introduction: Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cancer and is associated with drug related problems (DRPs) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM). We introduced a medication... Show moreIntroduction: Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cancer and is associated with drug related problems (DRPs) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM). We introduced a medication optimization care pathway for older adults with advanced cancer and a limited life expectancy and studied the prevalence of DRPs and PIMs as well as the adherence to medication-related recommendations and the patient satisfaction. Materials and Methods: A medication review was performed in patients aged >65 years with polypharmacy and a life expectancy of <24 months. Recommendations on adjustments of medication were discussed in a multidisciplinary team including a pharmacist, an oncologist, and a geriatrician. Implementation of the recommendations was left to the discretion of the oncologist. Four weeks after the implementation, the patient filled a questionnaire to assess satisfaction.Results: One hundred twenty patients were included. The mean age was 75 years and 39% were female. A mean of 12 medications was used. The median number of DRP was 6.0 per patient and median number of PIMs was 3.0 per patient. Overtreatment accounted for 26% of DRP and the most frequently involved drug classes were antihypertensive medication (22%), non-opioid analgesics (22%), and antilipemics (12%). The multidisciplinary team accepted 78% of the recommendations of the pharmacist and the oncologist implemented 54% of the recommendations. Overall, patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the intervention.Discussion: DRPs and PIMs are highly prevalent in this population and can be reduced by a multidisciplinary medication optimization intervention. Patients appreciate the medication optimization intervention and are satisfied with the intervention. Show less
Background General practitioners (GPs) should regularly review patients' medications and, if necessary, deprescribe, as inappropriate polypharmacy may harm patients' health. However, deprescribing... Show moreBackground General practitioners (GPs) should regularly review patients' medications and, if necessary, deprescribe, as inappropriate polypharmacy may harm patients' health. However, deprescribing can be challenging for physicians. This study investigates GPs' deprescribing decisions in 31 countries. Methods In this case vignette study, GPs were invited to participate in an online survey containing three clinical cases of oldest-old multimorbid patients with potentially inappropriate polypharmacy. Patients differed in terms of dependency in activities of daily living (ADL) and were presented with and without history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). For each case, we asked GPs if they would deprescribe in their usual practice. We calculated proportions of GPs who reported they would deprescribe and performed a multilevel logistic regression to examine the association between history of CVD and level of dependency on GPs' deprescribing decisions. Results Of 3,175 invited GPs, 54% responded (N = 1,706). The mean age was 50 years and 60% of respondents were female. Despite differences across GP characteristics, such as age (with older GPs being more likely to take deprescribing decisions), and across countries, overall more than 80% of GPs reported they would deprescribe the dosage of at least one medication in oldest-old patients (> 80 years) with polypharmacy irrespective of history of CVD. The odds of deprescribing was higher in patients with a higher level of dependency in ADL (OR =1.5, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.80) and absence of CVD (OR =3.04, 95%CI 2.58 to 3.57). Interpretation The majority of GPs in this study were willing to deprescribe one or more medications in oldest-old multimorbid patients with polypharmacy. Willingness was higher in patients with increased dependency in ADL and lower in patients with CVD. Show less
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify key features to be addressed in the reporting of deprescribing trials and to elab-orate and explain CONSORT items in this regard.Study Design... Show moreObjective: The objective of this study was to identify key features to be addressed in the reporting of deprescribing trials and to elab-orate and explain CONSORT items in this regard.Study Design and Setting: As a first step in a multistage process and based on a systematic review of deprescribing trials, we elab-orated variation in design, intervention, and reporting of the included trials of the review. We identified items that were missed or insufficiently described, using the CONSORT and TIDieR checklists. The resulting list of items, which we considered relevant to be reported in deprescribing trials, were discussed in a single-round Delphi exercise and subsequently in a full-day face-to-face meeting with an international panel of 14 experts. We agreed on CONSORT items for further elaboration with regard to design and reporting of deprescribing trials.Results: We identified seven CONSORT items on trial design, participants, intervention, outcomes, flowchart, and harms, where the investigators of deprescribing trials should take into consideration specific aspects, such as whether or not to use placebo or how to inform participants.Conclusion: This article presents an elaboration to the CONSORT statement for the reporting of deprescribing trials. It may also support investigators in motivated design choices. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
BackgroundMultimorbidity and polypharmacy are very common in older adults in primary care. Ideally, general practitioners (GPs), should regularly review medication lists to identify inappropriate... Show moreBackgroundMultimorbidity and polypharmacy are very common in older adults in primary care. Ideally, general practitioners (GPs), should regularly review medication lists to identify inappropriate medication(s) and, where appropriate, deprescribe. However, it remains challenging to deprescribe given time constraints and few recommendations from guidelines. Further, patient related barriers and enablers to deprescribing have to be accounted for. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers to deprescribing as reported by older adults with polypharmacy and multimorbidity.MethodsWe conducted a survey among participants aged >= 70years, with multimorbidity (>= 3 chronic conditions) and polypharmacy (>= 5 chronic medications). We invited Swiss GPs, to recruit eligible patients who then completed a paper-based survey on demographics, medications and chronic conditions. We used the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire and added twelve additional Likert scale questions and two open-ended questions to assess barriers and enablers towards deprescribing, which we coded and categorized into meaningful themes.ResultSixty four Swiss GPs consented to recruit 5-6 patients each and returned 300 participant responses. Participants were 79.1years (SD 5.7), 47% female, 34% lived alone, and 86% managed their medications themselves. Sixty-seven percent of participants took 5-9 regular medicines and 24% took >= 10 medicines. The majority of participants (77%) were willing to deprescribe one or more of their medicines if their doctor said it was possible. There was no association with sex, age or the number of medicines and willingness to deprescribe. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, there was a strong positive association between willingness to deprescribe and saying that because they have a good relationship with their GP, they would feel that deprescribing was safe OR 11.3 (95% CI: 4.64-27.3) and agreeing that they would be willing to deprescribe if new studies showed an avoidable risk OR 8.0 (95% CI 3.79-16.9). From the open questions, the most mentioned barriers towards deprescribing were patients feeling well on their current medicines and being convinced that they need all their medicines.ConclusionsMost older adults with polypharmacy are willing to deprescribe. GPs may be able to increase deprescribing by building trust with their patients and communicating evidence about the risks of medication use. Show less
This thesis shows that an attempt to deprescribe preventive cardiovascular medication in 40 to 70 year old low-risk patients under surveillance of the GP is safe in the short term. The... Show moreThis thesis shows that an attempt to deprescribe preventive cardiovascular medication in 40 to 70 year old low-risk patients under surveillance of the GP is safe in the short term. The deprescribing consultation should be patient-centered in order to optimally judge overtreatment.Decision-making could be improved if more personalised risk scores were available, that assess an individual’s CVD risk and benefit of treatment. Opportunities for future development of these personalised risk scores lie in the use of routinely registered patient data.Overall, this thesis’ findings provide both practical tools for GPs to judge overtreatment in low-risk patients, as well as valuable information for policy makers revising the cardiovascular risk management guideline. Show less
