Introduction Little is known about the comparative effects of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), or dipeptidyl peptidase-4... Show moreIntroduction Little is known about the comparative effects of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) on the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in routine care, which may differ from the controlled setting of trials.Methods Observational study comparing risks of AKI among new users of SGLT2i, GLP1-RA or DPP-4i in the region of Stockholm, Sweden, during 2008-2018. AKI was defined by ICD-10 codes and creatinine-based KDIGO criteria. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for 60 potential confounders, weighted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios and absolute risks.Results We included 17,407 participants who newly initiated DPP-4i (N = 10,605), GLP1-RA (N = 4448) or SGLT2i (N = 2354). Mean age was 63 years (39% women) and median (IQR) eGFR was 89 (73-100) ml/min/1.73 m(2). During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 1411 participants experienced AKI. SGLT2i users had the lowest incidence rate of AKI, 18.3 [CI 95% 14.1-23.4] per 1000 person years, followed by GLP1-RA (22.5; 19.9-25.3) and DPP-4i (26.6; 25-28.2). The weighted 3-year absolute risk for AKI was 5.79% [3.63-8.52] in the SGLT2i group, compared with 7.03% [5.69-8.69] and 7.00% [6.43-7.58] in the GLP1-RA and DPP-4i groups, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.73 [CI 95% 0.45-1.16] for SGLT2i vs. DPP-4i, and 0.98 [CI 95% 0.82-1.18] for GLP1-RA vs. DPP-4i.Conclusion This study of routine care patients initiating novel glucose-lowering drugs showed similar occurrence of AKI between therapies, and suggests lower risk for SGLT2i. Show less
Smeets, N.J.L.; Teunissen, E.M.M.; Velden, K. van der; Burgh, M.J.P. van der; Linders, D.E.; Teesselink, E.; ... ; Wildt, S.N. de 2022
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and... Show moreBackground: Acute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and ARC prevalence estimates are based on estimation of GFR (eGFR) using serum creatinine (SCr), which is known to be inaccurate. We aimed to test our hypothesis that AKI prevalence will be higher and ARC prevalence will be lower in critically ill children when using iohexol-based measured GFR (mGFR), rather than using eGFR. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the performance of different SCr-based eGFR methods. Methods In this single-center prospective study, critically ill term-born neonates and children were included. mGFR was calculated using a plasma disappearance curve after parenteral administration of iohexol. AKI diagnosis was based on the KDIGO criteria, SCr-based eGFR, and creatinine clearance (CrCL). Differences between eGFR and mGFR were determined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and by calculating bias and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within 30% of mGFR values). Results: One hundred five children, including 43 neonates, were included. AKI prevalence was higher based on mGFR (48%), than with KDIGO or eGFR (11-40%). ARC prevalence was lower with mGFR (24%) compared to eGFR (38-51%). eGFR equations significantly overestimated mGFR (60-71 versus 41 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p<0.001-0.002). Accuracy was highest with eGFR equations based on age- and sex-dependent equations (up to 59%). Conclusion: Iohexol-based AKI prevalence was higher and ARC prevalence lower compared to standard SCr-based eGFR methods. Age- and sex-dependent equations for eGFR (eGFR-Smeets for neonates and eGFR-Pierce for children) best approached measured GFR and should preferably be used to optimize diagnosis of AKI and ARC in this population. Show less
Smeets, N.J.L.; Teunissen, E.M.M.; Velden, K. van der; Burgh, M.J.P. van der; Linders, D.E.; Teesselink, E.; ... ; Wildt, S.N. de 2022
Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and... Show moreBackground Acute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and ARC prevalence estimates are based on estimation of GFR (eGFR) using serum creatinine (SCr), which is known to be inaccurate. We aimed to test our hypothesis that AKI prevalence will be higher and ARC prevalence will be lower in critically ill children when using iohexol-based measured GFR (mGFR), rather than using eGFR. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the performance of different SCr-based eGFR methods.Methods In this single-center prospective study, critically ill term-born neonates and children were included. mGFR was calculated using a plasma disappearance curve after parenteral administration of iohexol. AKI diagnosis was based on the KDIGO criteria, SCr-based eGFR, and creatinine clearance (CrCL). Differences between eGFR and mGFR were determined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and by calculating bias and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within 30% of mGFR values).Results One hundred five children, including 43 neonates, were included. AKI prevalence was higher based on mGFR (48%), than with KDIGO or eGFR (11-40%). ARC prevalence was lower with mGFR (24%) compared to eGFR (38-51%). eGFR equations significantly overestimated mGFR (60-71 versus 41 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p<0.001-0.002). Accuracy was highest with eGFR equations based on age- and sex-dependent equations (up to 59%).Conclusion Iohexol-based AKI prevalence was higher and ARC prevalence lower compared to standard SCr-based eGFR methods. Age- and sex-dependent equations for eGFR (eGFR-Smeets for neonates and eGFR-Pierce for children) best approached measured GFR and should preferably be used to optimize diagnosis of AKI and ARC in this population. Show less
Increased patient involvement has been show to result in better clinical outcomes and increased autonomy and to offer a way to control volume and costs of chronic healthcare. The main research... Show moreIncreased patient involvement has been show to result in better clinical outcomes and increased autonomy and to offer a way to control volume and costs of chronic healthcare. The main research question of this thesis was whether part of the kidney transplant aftercare can be delegated to patients without loss of quality of care. The results of the studies described show that self-monitoring kidney function after transplantation is an attractive option to kidney transplant patients and can lead to a significant decrease in number of outpatient visits without compromising on quality of care. Further, self-monitoring could offer a relatively cheap way to increase monitoring frequency, which could lead to earlier detection and treatment of complications and, consequently, improved clinical outcomes. To unravel the full potential of self-monitoring kidney function after transplantation, it is recommended to use accurate measurement devices that both patients and healthcare professionals have confidence in, design a protocol with the involvement of a multidisciplinary group that is truly representative of all stakeholders (including patients and physicians that are more critical of self-monitoring) and choose a study design that includes formative evaluations instead of summative evaluations alone. Show less
