This paper focuses on genetic counselling in Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS), a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a deletion 22q13.3 or a pathogenic variant in SHANK3. It is one of a... Show moreThis paper focuses on genetic counselling in Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS), a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a deletion 22q13.3 or a pathogenic variant in SHANK3. It is one of a series of papers written by the European PMS consortium as a consensus guideline. We reviewed the available literature based on pre-set questions to formulate recommendations on counselling, diagnostic work-up and surveillance for tumours related to ring chromosome 22. All recommendations were approved by the consortium, which consists of professionals and patient representatives, using a voting procedure. PMS can only rarely be diagnosed based solely on clinical features and requires confirmation via genetic testing. In most cases, the family will be referred to a clinical geneticist for counselling after the genetic diagnosis has been made. Family members will be investigated and, if indicated, the chance of recurrence discussed with them. Most individuals with PMS have a de novo deletion or a pathogenic variant of SHANK3. The 22q13.3 deletion can be a simple deletion, a ring chromosome 22, or the result of a parental balanced chromosomal anomaly, influencing the risk of recurrence. Individuals with a ring chromosome 22 have an increased risk of NF2-related schwannomatosis (formerly neurofibromatosis type 2) and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours, which are associated with the tumour-suppressor genes NF2 and SMARCB1, respectively, and both genes are located on chromosome 22. The prevalence of PMS due to a ring chromosome 22 is estimated to be 10–20%. The risk of developing a tumour in an individual with a ring chromosome 22 can be calculated as 2–4%. However, those individuals who do develop tumours often have multiple. We recommend referring all individuals with PMS and their parents to a clinical geneticist or a comparably experienced medical specialist for genetic counselling, further genetic testing, follow-up and discussion of prenatal diagnostic testing in subsequent pregnancies. We also recommend karyotyping to diagnose or exclude a ring chromosome 22 in individuals with a deletion 22q13.3 detected by molecular tests. If a ring chromosome 22 is found, we recommend discussing personalised follow-up for NF2-related tumours and specifically cerebral imaging between the age of 14 and 16 years. Show less
Osthoff, A.K.R.; Vlieland, T.P.M.V.; Meichtry, A.; Bodegom-Vos, L. van; Topalidis, B.; Buchi, S.; ... ; Niedermann, K. 2022
Background: The Ankylosing Spondylitis Association of Switzerland (SVMB) aimed to implement physical activity recommendations (PAR) within their exercise groups (EGs). The PAR promote exercise in... Show moreBackground: The Ankylosing Spondylitis Association of Switzerland (SVMB) aimed to implement physical activity recommendations (PAR) within their exercise groups (EGs). The PAR promote exercise in all fitness dimensions at the correct dose. To implement the PAR within EGs, they were translated into a new EG concept with five key activities: (a) training for supervising physiotherapists (PTs), (b) correctly dosed exercises in all fitness dimensions, (c) exercise counselling, (d) bi-annual fitness assessments, and (e) individual exercise training, in addition to EG. All these activities were realized in close coordination with SVMB management.Objectives: To analyse the implementation success by evaluating adherence/fidelity, feasibility, and satisfaction at the patient, PTs, and organisational level.Methods: The five key activities of the new EG concept were developed, executed, and assessed after 6 months. The primary outcomes for implementation success were adherence of patients to the recommended exercise behaviour, self-reported by electronic diary; fidelity of PTs to the new concept, self-reported by diary; SVMB organisational changes. Secondary outcomes were feasibility and satisfaction with the new EG concept at all three levels. The tertiary outcome, to evaluate the effectiveness of PAR, was patient fitness, assessed through fitness assessments.Results: 30 patients with axSpA (ten women, mean age 58 +/- 9 years) and four PTs (three women, mean age 46 +/- 9 years) participated. The patients' self-reporting of adherence to the PAR was insufficient (43%), possibly due to technical problems with the electronic dairy. The PTs' fidelity to the new EG concept was satisfactory. On all levels, the new concept was generally perceived as feasible and useful for supporting personalised exercise.The frequency of exercise counselling and the fitness assessments was found by patients and PTs to be too high and rigid. Patients' cardiorespiratory fitness [ES 1.21 (95%CI 0.59, 1.89)] and core strength [ES 0.61 (95%CI 0.18, 1.06)] improved over the 6 months.Conclusions: The pilot implementation of PAR showed acceptance and satisfaction to be sufficient, thus confirming the need for evidence-based EGs, provided by a patient organisation in order to support active PA behaviour. However, adaptations are necessary to increase its feasibility for nationwide implementation. Show less
