Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by memory loss and declined cognitive functioning. Brain changes in AD involve grey matter atrophy and changes in brain... Show moreAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by memory loss and declined cognitive functioning. Brain changes in AD involve grey matter atrophy and changes in brain function. These different brain characteristics can respectively be visualized with structural and functional MRI scans. These MRI modalities have been used for AD classification, but studies typically only include a limited number of features. In this thesis we derived multiple types of features from each MRI modality, and combined those to discriminate AD patients and elderly controls. First, we showed that AD classification accuracy increases when combining multiple types of measures from a single MRI modality. This was shown for structural MRI scans in chapter 2, and for resting state fMRI scans in chapter 3. In chapter 4 we evaluated whether MRI based AD classification models can discriminate AD in a diverse clinical population as well. This worked to some extent, and it worked best using structural MRI scans. In chapter 5 we used baseline multimodal MRI scans from the same diverse clinical population to predict two-year follow-up cognitive decline. Decline was predicted above chance level for the MMSE, but not for six other neuropsychological tests. Show less
This dissertation examines how in eighteenth-century Europe, naturalists sought to study, grasp and capture the world of fish. Working on the intersection of the history of science and book history... Show moreThis dissertation examines how in eighteenth-century Europe, naturalists sought to study, grasp and capture the world of fish. Working on the intersection of the history of science and book history, this research aims to shed light on how naturalists came to present themselves as authorities in an emerging field. It does so by focussing on a set of ‘fish books’, i.e., natural historical works that describe and depict fish. The first is Francis Willughby and John Ray’s "Historia piscium" (Oxford, 1686); the second Peter Artedi’s "Ichthyologia sive opera omnia de piscibus" (Leiden, 1738), and the third Marcus Élieser Bloch’s twelve volume series "Allgemeine Naturgeschichte der Fische" (Berlin, 1782–1795). These works are analysed alongside correspondences, manuscripts and natural historical collections. Together, these sources show that the development of the study of fish in this period can be best be understood as a process of continuous demarcation. This dissertation argues that the study of fish was subject to recurrent debates on subject, method and practitioner, and that such discussions were of both epistemological and social nature. In presenting their fish books, naturalists leveraged such discussions as to secure a place for themselves in the capricious environment of early modern natural history. Show less
Rutgers, J.J.; Banki, T.; Kamp, A. van der; Waterlander, T.J.; Scheijde-Vermeulen, M.A.; Heuvel-Eibrink, M.M. van den; ... ; Krijger, R.R. de 2021
Background Histopathological classification of Wilms tumors determines treatment regimen. Machine learning has been shown to contribute to histopathological classification in various malignancies... Show moreBackground Histopathological classification of Wilms tumors determines treatment regimen. Machine learning has been shown to contribute to histopathological classification in various malignancies but requires large numbers of manually annotated images and thus specific pathological knowledge. This study aimed to assess whether trained, inexperienced observers could contribute to reliable annotation of Wilms tumor components for classification performed by machine learning. Methods Four inexperienced observers (medical students) were trained in histopathology of normal kidneys and Wilms tumors by an experienced observer (pediatric pathologist). Twenty randomly selected scanned Wilms tumor-slides (from n = 1472 slides) were annotated, and annotations were independently classified by both the inexperienced observers and two experienced pediatric pathologists. Agreement between the six observers and for each tissue element was measured using kappa statistics (kappa). Results Pairwise interobserver agreement between all inexperienced and experienced observers was high (range: 0.845-0.950). The interobserver variability for the different histological elements, including all vital tumor components and therapy-related effects, showed high values for all kappa-coefficients (> 0.827). Conclusions Inexperienced observers can be trained to recognize specific histopathological tumor and tissue elements with high interobserver agreement with experienced observers. Nevertheless, supervision by experienced pathologists remains necessary. Results of this study can be used to facilitate more rapid progress for supervised machine learning-based algorithm development in pediatric pathology and beyond. Show less
Renewed calls for decolonizing anthropology in the 21st century raise the question of what work earlier waves of decolonization since the 1960s have left undone. Some of this work should focus on... Show moreRenewed calls for decolonizing anthropology in the 21st century raise the question of what work earlier waves of decolonization since the 1960s have left undone. Some of this work should focus on the classification of human differences, which figured prominently in all phases of the discipline’s history: as a methodology in its racist phases, as an object of study during its late colonial phase of professionalization, as self-critical reflexivity in the 1980s and 1990s, and as a renewed critique in the 21st century. Can a universal methodology of studying classifications of human kinds arise from the discipline’s past of colonial stereotyping? I argue affirmatively, through an approach that recognizes time as the epistemic condition that connects past and present positions to present and future methodologies. Firstly, my analysis distinguishes the parochial embedding in colonial culture of Durkheim and Mauss’ ideas about classification from their more universal intentions. This is then developed into a threefold reflexive and timeful methodology of studying classification’s nominal-descriptive, constructive, and interventionist dimensions—a process of adding temporality to the study of classification. Subsequently, Antenor Firmin’s 19th-century critique of racial classifications, and W. E. B. Du Bois’s theory of double consciousness help to show how this threefold methodology addresses the insufficiently theorized process of being classified and discriminated against through racial categories wielded by the powers that be. These arguments radicalize the essay’s timeful perspective by concluding that we need to avoid modernist uses of time as classification and adopt the aforementioned threefold methodology in order to put time in classifications of human kinds. This reverses modern positivism’s subordination to methodological rules of the epistemic conditions posed by contingent history and shows instead that the universal goals of methodology should be understood as a future ideal. Show less
