Introduction and objectives: To evaluate the migration of Tc-99m-tilmanocept from the injection site (IS) as well as the uptake in sentinel nodes (SNs) and non-SNs for lymphatic mapping in patients... Show moreIntroduction and objectives: To evaluate the migration of Tc-99m-tilmanocept from the injection site (IS) as well as the uptake in sentinel nodes (SNs) and non-SNs for lymphatic mapping in patients with breast cancer and melanoma, scheduled for SN biopsy after interstitial tracer administration.Materials and methods: For 29 primary tumours in 28 patients (mean age: 62y, range: 45-81y) scheduled for SN biopsy planar images were acquired 10 and 120 min after administration of 74 MBq Tc-99m-tilmanocept, in order to evaluate lymphatic drainage as well as uptake ratios between injection site (IS), SN and non-SN. SPECT/CT was performed immediately after delayed planar images to enable anatomical lymph node localization.Results: SNs were visualized in all patients (100%) with drainage to 34 basins. Uptake in non-SNs was perceived in 16 basins (47%). Number of SNs was concordant between early and delayed images in all basins excepting five (86%). In 24 patients tracer migrated to one lymph node basin (LNB), in three to 2 and in one to 4. When IS was included (n = 29) on image, IS/SN ratio could be measured per LNB. The IS/SN ratio at 2 h compared to 15 min decreased with an average of 66% (range: 15-96%). SN/non-SN 2 h ratio in LNBs with visible non-SNs averaged 6.6 (range: 2.3-15.6). In 9 patients with two SNs SN1/SN2 ratio averaged 1.9 on delayed images. At histopathology, SNs were found to be tumour positive in 7 basins (20%).Conclusion: Tc-99m-tilmanocept appears to meet the requirements for improved SN imaging in breast cancer and melanoma on the basis of early and persistent SN visualization frequently accompanied by no or markedly less non-SN uptake.This is associated to rapid migration from the injection site together with increasing SN uptake and retention as expressed by decreasing IS/SN and persistently high SN/non-SN ratios. Further head-to-head comparison of Tc-99m-tilmanocept with standard SN radiotracers in larger series of patients is necessary. (C) 2020 Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved. Show less
Background The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic forced the Dutch national screening program to a halt and increased the burden on health care services, necessitating the introduction of specific... Show moreBackground The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic forced the Dutch national screening program to a halt and increased the burden on health care services, necessitating the introduction of specific breast cancer treatment recommendations from week 12 of 2020. We aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis, stage and initial treatment of breast cancer. Methods Women included in the Netherlands Cancer Registry and diagnosed during four periods in weeks 2-17 of 2020 were compared with reference data from 2018/2019 (averaged). Weekly incidence was calculated by age group and tumor stage. The number of women receiving initial treatment within 3 months of diagnosis was calculated by period, initial treatment, age, and stage. Initial treatment, stratified by tumor behavior (ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] or invasive), was analyzed by logistic regression and adjusted for age, socioeconomic status, stage, subtype, and region. Factors influencing time to treatment were analyzed by Cox regression. Results Incidence declined across all age groups and tumor stages (except stage IV) from 2018/2019 to 2020, particularly for DCIS and stage I disease (p < 0.05). DCIS was less likely to be treated within 3 months (odds ratio [OR](wks2-8): 2.04, ORwks9-11: 2.18). Invasive tumors were less likely to be treated initially by mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (ORwks12-13: 0.52) or by breast conserving surgery (ORwks14-17: 0.75). Chemotherapy was less likely for tumors diagnosed in the beginning of the study period (ORwks9-11: 0.59, ORwks12-13: 0.66), but more likely for those diagnosed at the end (ORwks14-17: 1.31). Primary hormonal treatment was more common (ORwks2-8: 1.23, ORwks9-11: 1.92, ORwks12-13: 3.01). Only women diagnosed in weeks 2-8 of 2020 experienced treatment delays. Conclusion The incidence of breast cancer fell in early 2020, and treatment approaches adapted rapidly. Clarification is needed on how this has affected stage migration and outcomes. Show less
