Introduction: This study aims to develop a robust preoperative prediction model for anastomotic leakage (AL) after surgical resection for rectal cancer, based on established risk factors and with... Show moreIntroduction: This study aims to develop a robust preoperative prediction model for anastomotic leakage (AL) after surgical resection for rectal cancer, based on established risk factors and with the power of a large prospective nation-wide population-based study cohort. Materials and methods: A development cohort was formed by using the DCRA (Dutch ColoRectal Audit), a mandatory population-based repository of all patients who undergo colorectal cancer resection in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18 years or older were included who underwent surgical resection for rectal cancer with primary anastomosis (with or without deviating ileostomy) between 2011 and 2019. Anastomotic leakage was defined as clinically relevant leakage requiring reintervention. Multivariable logistic regression was used to build a prediction model and cross-validation was used to validate the model. Results: A total of 13.175 patients were included for analysis. AL was diagnosed in 1319 patients (10%). A deviating stoma was constructed in 6853 patients (52%). The following variables were identified as significant risk factors and included in the prediction model: gender, age, BMI, ASA classification, neo-adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, cT stage, distance of the tumor from anal verge, and deviating ileos-tomy. The model had a concordance-index of 0.664, which remained 0.658 after cross-validation. In addition, a nomogram was developed. Conclusion: The present study generated a discriminative prediction model based on preoperatively available variables. The proposed score can be used for patient counselling and risk-stratification before undergoing rectal resection for cancer. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Show less
Ozmen, I.; Grupa, V.E.M.; Bedrikovetski, S.; Dudi-Venkata, N.N.; Huisman, D.E.; Reudink, M.; ... ; LekCheck Study Grp 2022
Purpose Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded complication after colorectal surgery. Preoperatively identifying high-risk patients can help to reduce the incidence of this complication. For this... Show morePurpose Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded complication after colorectal surgery. Preoperatively identifying high-risk patients can help to reduce the incidence of this complication. For this reason, AL risk nomograms have been developed. The objective of this study was to test the AL risk nomogram developed by Frasson, et al. for validity and to identify risk-factors for AL. Methods From the international multi-center LekCheck study database, patients who underwent colonic surgery with the formation of an anastomosis were included. Data were prospectively collected between 2016 and 2019 at 14 hospitals. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUROC) were performed. Results A total of 643 patients were included. The median age was 70 years and 51% were male. The majority underwent surgery for malignancies (80.7%). The overall AL rate was 9.2%. The risk nomogram was not predictive for AL in the population tested (AUROC 0.572). Low preoperative haemoglobin (p = 0.006), intraoperative hypothermia (p = 0.02), contamination of the operative field (p = 0.004), and use of epidural analgesia (p = 0.02) were independent risk-factors for AL. Conclusion The AL risk nomogram could not be validated using the international LekCheck study database. In the future, intraoperative predictive factors for AL, as identified in this study, should also be included in AL risk predictors. Show less
Purpose Scarce data are available on differences among index colectomies for colon cancer regarding reoperation for anastomotic leakage (AL) and clinical consequences. Therefore, this nationwide... Show morePurpose Scarce data are available on differences among index colectomies for colon cancer regarding reoperation for anastomotic leakage (AL) and clinical consequences. Therefore, this nationwide observational study aimed to evaluate reoperations for AL after colon cancer surgery and short-term postoperative outcomes for the different index colectomies. Methods Patients who underwent resection with anastomosis for a first primary colon carcinoma between 2013 and 2019 and were registered in the Dutch ColoRectal Audit were included. Primary outcomes were mortality, ICU admission, and stoma creation. Results Among 39,565 patients, the overall AL rate was 4.8% and ranged between 4.0% (right hemicolectomy) and 15.4% (subtotal colectomy). AL was predominantly managed with reoperation, ranging from 81.2% after transversectomy to 92.4% after sigmoid resection (p < 0.001). Median time to reoperation differed significantly between index colectomies (range 4-8 days, p < 0.001), with longer and comparable intervals for non-surgical reinterventions (range 13-18 days, p = 0.747). After reoperation, the highest mortality rates were observed for index transversectomy (15.4%) and right hemicolectomy (14.4%) and lowest for index sigmoid resection (5.6%) and subtotal colectomy (5.9%) (p < 0.001). Reoperation with stoma construction was associated with a higher mortality risk than without stoma construction after index right hemicolectomy (17.7% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.001). ICU admission rate was 62.6% overall (range 56.7-69.2%), and stoma construction rate ranged between 65.5% (right hemicolectomy) and 93.0% (sigmoid resection). Conclusion Significant differences in AL rate, reoperation rate, time to reoperation, postoperative mortality after reoperation, and stoma construction for AL were found among the different index colectomies for colon cancer, with relevance for patient counseling and perioperative management. Show less
This thesis focuses on quality assurance of rectal cancer treatment, in particular of the surgical treatment. Both oncological short-term and long-term outcome parameters are studied, but also... Show moreThis thesis focuses on quality assurance of rectal cancer treatment, in particular of the surgical treatment. Both oncological short-term and long-term outcome parameters are studied, but also other end-points which are important for quality assurance are investigated, such as anastomotic leakage and stoma reversal. The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery resulted in an improved survival of patients with rectal cancer. However, survival of the elderly patients and patients treated with an abdominoperineal resection improved less. For frail elderly patients, postoperative mortality is an important competitive risk factor and other treatment schedules might be more appropriate. The abdominoperineal resection itself was associated with a nonradical resection, decreased local control and decreased survival compared to patients treated with a low anterior resection. To improve these results, in selected cases preoperative treatment should consist of chemoradiotherapy and/or a widened resection. Anastomotic leakage is a feared complication after colorectal surgery. After surviving this complication, the overall survival rate in the long-term is still reduced. However, oncological outcome was not significantly affected. The presence of a stoma resulted in a lower symptomatic leakage rate. 20% of stomas was never reversed. Standardised postoperative surveillance resulted in an earlier confirmation of the diagnosis anastomotic leakage. Show less
Quality of surgical procedures in the treatment of cancer patients is of utmost importance. This thesis focuses on two large prospective randomised trials on gastric and rectal cancer. Important... Show moreQuality of surgical procedures in the treatment of cancer patients is of utmost importance. This thesis focuses on two large prospective randomised trials on gastric and rectal cancer. Important feature in both trials was the standardisation and quality control of surgery, enabling the reliable assessment of the rol of adjunctive therapies. The trial on gastric cancer showed no benefitit of extensive lymph node dissection in gastric cancer. However, if postoperative morbidity is reduced, extended surgery may be of benefit. Various ways of reducing the likelihood of postoperative complications are considered. The trial on rectal cancer patients showed that short term preoperative radiotherapy is capable of reducing the risk of local recurrence, which however does not lead to improvement of survival. Moreover, there are important side effects of radiotherapy, the most important one being the increased incidence of fecal incontinence in irradiated patients. Show less
