This thesis describes the PROMODE-study, which investigated in a pragmatic way whether a pro-active approach in primary care by screening for depressive symptoms, followed by an intervention offer... Show moreThis thesis describes the PROMODE-study, which investigated in a pragmatic way whether a pro-active approach in primary care by screening for depressive symptoms, followed by an intervention offer to persons of 75 years and over who screened positive, is (cost)effective to detect and relieve suffering from depressive symptoms at old age. We compared two screening methods regarding yield and costs. Furthermore, we found that scores of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale were higher when this screening questionnaire was self-administered than when interviewer-administered. In our intervention study, a cluster-randomised controlled trial, we found that the stepped-care intervention program was not (cost)effective compared with usual care in general practice, possibly due to a low uptake of the offered course being the main part of the intervention. In a qualitative study we explored the limiting and motivating factors for accepting course participation. This revealed that most persons were not (yet) prepared to accept the unsolicited intervention offer, although perceived needs to relieve depressive symptoms seemed to largely match the elements of the course. It is discussed that a more selective approach, aimed at high risk-groups and focussing on need for and readiness to accept help, might increase efficiency of a combined screening-intervention program. Show less
