Background Inflammation around the tendons of interosseous muscles of the hand (interosseous tendon inflammation) was recently observed with MRI for the first time in patients with rheumatoid... Show moreBackground Inflammation around the tendons of interosseous muscles of the hand (interosseous tendon inflammation) was recently observed with MRI for the first time in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in at-risk individuals with detectable anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, generating the hypothesis that interosseous tendon inflammation precedes clinical arthritis. To better understand the role of interosseous tendon inflammation during the development of rheumatoid arthritis, we studied the frequency of interosseous tendon inflammation in healthy individuals and in those with arthralgia that was suspected of progressing to rheumatoid arthritis (ie, clinically suspect arthralgia) and the association of interosseous tendon inflammation with other symptoms of inflamed joint tissues and with clinical arthritis development.Methods Adult (age >= 18 years) patients who presented with clinically suspect arthralgia and symptom-free (control) individuals underwent contrast-enhanced hand MRI. MRIs were evaluated for interosseous tendon inflammation on the radial and ulnar sides of the second to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints, and for synovitis, tenosynovitis, and osteitis using the rheumatoid arthritis MRI scoring system. Patients with clinically suspect arthralgia were followed up for clinical arthritis development. The presence of local tenosynovium was examined using immunohistochemistry for anti-CD55 and anti-CD68 on tissue from the hands of three embalmed bodies donated for scientific research. The primary outcome for the cross-sectional part of the study was the presence of interosseous tendon inflammation on MRI. The primary outcome for the longitudinal part of the study was development of clinical arthritis.Findings Between April 3, 2012, and May 20, 2020, 667 patients with clinically suspect arthralgia (mean age 44 years [SD 13], 504 [76%] were women and 163 [24%] were men) underwent contrast-enhanced hand MRI. Between Nov 1, 2013, and Nov 30, 2014, 193 symptom-free controls were recruited (mean age 50 years [SD 16], 136 [70%] were women and 57 [30%] were men). Two (1%) of 193 symptom-free controls had interosseous tendon inflammation. Immunohistochemistry of cadaveric hand tissues showed no tenosynovium surrounding interosseous tendons. At inclusion, 67 (10%) of 667 patients with clinically suspect arthralgia had interosseous tendon inflammation (p<00001 vs symptom-free controls). Interosseous tendon inflammation occurred more frequently if synovitis (odds ratio [OR] 22 [95% CI 12-42]), or tenosynovitis (OR 97 [55-170]), was present at metacarpophalangeal joints. A three-dimensional MRI reconstruction suggested confluency of interosseous tendon inflammation with metacarpophalangeal-flexor-tenosynovitis. 91 (16%) of 558 patients with clinically suspect arthralgia developed clinical arthritis during follow-up (median total follow-up 253 months [95% CI 251-255]). Patients with clinically suspect arthralgia with interosseous tendon inflammation had a higher risk of developing clinical arthritis (hazard ratio [HR] 45 [28-72]), which was attenuated but still significant after adjusting for concomitant synovitis, tenosynovitis, or osteitis (HR 17 [102-28]).Interpretation Interosseous tendon inflammation is almost absent in symptom-free individuals but occurs in people with clinically suspect arthralgia, in whom it correlates with symptoms and is associated with the development of clinical arthritis. The absence of local tenosynovium suggests that interosseous tendon inflammation arises from expanding local subclinical inflammation in the pre-arthritis phase of rheumatoid arthritis. Show less
Dossing, A.; Henriksen, M.; Ellegaard, K.; Nielsen, S.M.; Stamp, L.K.; Muller, F.C.; ... ; Bliddal, H. 2023
Background: Colchicine has been suggested for osteoarthritis treatment, but evidence is contradictory. We aimed to investigate colchicine's efficacy and safety compared with placebo in people with... Show moreBackground: Colchicine has been suggested for osteoarthritis treatment, but evidence is contradictory. We aimed to investigate colchicine's efficacy and safety compared with placebo in people with hand osteoarthritis. Methods: In this single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial we recruited adults with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and finger pain of at least 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale from an outpatient clinic in Denmark. The hand with the most severe finger pain at inclusion was the target hand. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 0 center dot 5 mg colchicine or placebo taken orally twice a day for 12 weeks, stratified by BMI (>= 30 kg/m2), sex, and age (>= 75 years). Participants, outcome assessors, and data analysts were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in target hand finger pain, assessed on a 100 mm visual analogue scale with a pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 15 mm, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed at week 12 in the intention-to-treat population. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04601883, and with EudraCT, 2020-002803-20. Findings: Between Jan 15, 2021, and March 3, 2022, 186 people were screened for eligibility, and 100 were randomly assigned to receive colchicine (n=50) or placebo (n=50). Participants had a mean age of 70 center dot 9 (SD 7 center dot 5) years, 69 (69%) of 100 were women and 31 (31%) were men. All participants completed the study. The mean change from baseline to week 12 in finger pain were -13 center dot 9 mm (SE 2 center dot 8) in the colchicine group and -13 center dot 5 mm (2 center dot 8) in the placebo group, with a between-group difference (colchicine vs placebo) of -0 center dot 4 mm (95% CI -7 center dot 6 to 6 center dot 7; p=0 center dot 90). In the colchicine group, there were 76 adverse events in 36 (72%) of 50 participants and one serious adverse advent (migraine attack leading to hospital admission). In the placebo group, there were 42 adverse events in 22 (44%) of 50 participants and two serious adverse events (cholecystitis and elevated alanine aminotransferase concentrations, in the same patient). Interpretation: In people with painful hand osteoarthritis, treatment with 0 center dot 5 mg of colchicine twice day for 12 weeks did not effectively relieve pain, and treatment with colchicine was associated with more adverse events. Show less
Dossing, A.; Henriksen, M.; Ellegaard, K.; Nielsen, S.M.; Stamp, L.K.; Müller, F.C.; ... ; Bliddal, H. 2023
BackgroundColchicine has been suggested for osteoarthritistreatment, but evidence is contradictory. We aimed to investigate colchicine's efficacy and safety compared with placebo in people with ha...Show moreBackgroundColchicine has been suggested for osteoarthritistreatment, but evidence is contradictory. We aimed to investigate colchicine's efficacy and safety compared with placebo in people with hand osteoarthritis.MethodsIn this single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial we recruited adults with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and finger pain of at least 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale from an outpatient clinic in Denmark. The hand with the most severe finger pain at inclusion was the target hand. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 0·5 mg colchicine or placebo taken orally twice a day for 12 weeks, stratified by BMI (≥30 kg/m2), sex, and age (≥75 years). Participants, outcome assessors, and data analysts were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in target hand finger pain, assessed on a 100 mm visual analogue scale with a pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 15 mm, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed at week 12 in the intention-to-treat population. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04601883, and with EudraCT, 2020-002803-20.FindingsBetween Jan 15, 2021, and March 3, 2022, 186 people were screened for eligibility, and 100 were randomly assigned to receive colchicine (n=50) or placebo (n=50). Participants had a mean age of 70·9 (SD 7·5) years, 69 (69%) of 100 were women and 31 (31%) were men. All participants completed the study. The mean change from baseline to week 12 in finger pain were –13·9 mm (SE 2·8) in the colchicine group and –13·5 mm (2·8) in the placebo group, with a between-group difference (colchicine vs placebo) of –0·4 mm (95% CI –7·6 to 6·7; p=0·90). In the colchicine group, there were 76 adverse events in 36 (72%) of 50 participants and one serious adverse advent (migraine attack leading to hospital admission). In the placebo group, there were 42 adverse events in 22 (44%) of 50 participants and two serious adverse events (cholecystitis and elevated alanine aminotransferase concentrations, in the same patient).InterpretationIn people with painful hand osteoarthritis, treatment with 0·5 mg of colchicine twice day for 12 weeks did not effectively relieve pain, and treatment with colchicine was associated with more adverse events.FundingThe Oak Foundation, IMK Almene Fond, Minister Erna Hamilton's Scholarship for Science and Art, AP Moller and Wife Chastine McKinney Moller's Foundation for Medical Science Advancement, The Danish Medical Association, the Velux Foundation, Aase and Ejnar Danielsen's Foundation, and Director Emil C Hertz and Wife Inger Hertz's foundation. Show less
Elhai, M.; Sritharan, N.; Boubaya, M.; Balbir-Gurman, A.; Siegert, E.; Hachulla, E.; ... ; USTAR Collaborators 2022
Background The current subclassification of systemic sclerosis into cutaneous subtypes does not fully capture the heterogeneity of the disease. We aimed to compare the performances of... Show moreBackground The current subclassification of systemic sclerosis into cutaneous subtypes does not fully capture the heterogeneity of the disease. We aimed to compare the performances of stratification into LeRoy's cutaneous subtypes versus stratification by autoantibody status in systemic sclerosis. Methods For this cohort study, we assessed people with systemic sclerosis in the multicentre international European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Individuals positive for systemic-sclerosis autoantibodies of two specificities were excluded, and remaining individuals were classified by cutaneous subtype, according to their systemic sclerosis-specific autoantibodies, or both. We assessed the performance of each model to predict overall survival, progression-free survival, disease progression, and different organ involvement. The three models were compared by use of the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and the net reclassification improvement (NRI). Missing data were imputed. Findings We assessed the database on July 26, 2019. Of 16 939 patients assessed for eligibility, 10 711 patients were included: 1647 (15middot4%) of 10 709 were male, 9062 (84middot6%) were female, mean age was 54middot4 (SD 13middot8) years, and mean disease duration was 7middot9 (SD 8middot2) years. Information regarding cutaneous subtype was available for 10 176 participants and antibody data were available for 9643 participants. In the prognostic analysis, there was no difference in AUC for overall survival (0middot82, 95% CI 0middot81-0middot84 for cutaneous only vs 0middot84, 0middot82-0middot85 for antibody only vs 0middot84, 0middot83-0middot86 for combined) or for progression-free survival (0middot70, 0middot69-0middot71 vs 0middot71, 0middot70-0middot72 vs 0middot71, 0middot70-0middot72). However, at 4 years the NRI showed substantial improvement for the antibody-only model compared with the cutaneous-only model in prediction of overall survival (0middot57, 0middot46-0middot71 for antibody only vs 0middot29, 0middot19-0middot39 for cutaneous only) and disease progression (0middot36, 0middot29-0middot46 vs 0middot21, 0middot14-0middot28). The antibody -only model did better than the cutaneous-only model in predicting renal crisis (AUC 0middot72, 0middot70-0middot74 for antibody only vs 0middot66, 0middot64-0middot69 for cutaneous only) and lung fibrosis leading to restrictive lung function (AUC 0middot76, 0middot75-0middot77 vs 0middot71, 0middot70-0middot72). The combined model improved the prediction of digital ulcers and elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure, but did poorly for cardiac involvement. Interpretation The autoantibody-only model outperforms cutaneous-only subsetting for risk stratifying people with systemic sclerosis in the EUSTAR cohort. Physicians should be aware of these findings at the time of decision making for patient management. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Liem, S.I.E.; Boonstra, M.; Cessie, S. le; Riccardi, A.; Airo, P.; Distler, O.; ... ; EUSTAR Collaborators 2022
Background We aimed to evaluate sex-specific risk of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA) on mortality, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, interstitial lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension... Show moreBackground We aimed to evaluate sex-specific risk of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA) on mortality, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, interstitial lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension in two cohorts of people with systemic sclerosis.Methods This study was a 10-year analysis of the prospective Leiden Combined Care in Systemic Sderosis (CCISS) cohort in the Netherlands and the international European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) cohort. We included participants with systemic sderosis according to the 2013 American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) classification criteria; available autoantibody status; available skin subtyping; at least one available radiographic assessment of interstitial lung disease; and with a known date of disease onset. People with systemic sclerosis were categorised in six risk groups by sex and autoantibody status (anti-centromere antibody [ACA]-positive female, ACA-positive male, ACA and ATA-negative female, ACA and ATA-negative male, ATA-positive female, and ATA-positive male). We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models, accounting for left-truncated survival to prevent bias because the date of disease onset (first non-Raynaud's symptom) preceded the date of cohort entry for all patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcomes were diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, interstitial lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension.Findings 445 (63%) of 708 participants between April 1,2009, and Jan 1,2022, in CCISS (101 [23%] male and 344[77%] female) and 4263 (50%) of 8590 between June 1, 2004, and March 28,2018, in EUSTAR (783[18%] male and 3480 [82%] female) were eligible for this study. In both cohorts, ATA expression occurred significantly more often in males than in females (39 [39%] of 101 males vs 67 [19%] of 344 females in CCISS; p<0.0001 and 381 [49%] of 783 males vs 1323 [38%] of 3480 females in EUSTAR; p<0. 0001). According to estimated survival rates, 30% of ATA-positive males versus 12% of ATA-positive females died in the CCISS cohort and 33% versus 15% died in the EUSTAR cohort within 10 years. After adjustment for age, race, and autoantibody status, male sex remained the most important risk factor for all-cause mortality (HR 2.9 [95% CI 1.5-5.5] in CCISS, 0.0018; and HR 2.6 [2.0-3.4] in EUSTAR, p<0.0001).Interpretation We show that the association between male sex and increased mortality in systemic sclerosis cannot be explained by higher ATA prevalence. However, additional research on the effect of sex-specific characteristics on people with systemic sclerosis is required. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Background Nintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). We assessed the safety and tolerability of nintedanib in... Show moreBackground Nintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). We assessed the safety and tolerability of nintedanib in patients with autoimmune disease-related ILDs and with other ILDs in subgroups by sex.Methods In this post-hoc analysis, we pooled data from the two INPULSIS trials in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the SENSCIS trial in patients with fibrosing ILDs associated with systemic sclerosis, and the INBUILD trial in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than IPF. In each trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive oral nintedanib 150 mg twice daily or matched placebo. We assessed adverse events reported over 52 weeks in patients with autoimmune disease-related ILDs and other ILDs in subgroups by sex.Findings In these analyses, we included 746 patients with autoimmune disease-related ILDs (523 [70%] were female, 223 [30%] were male; 615 [82%] had systemic sclerosis), of whom 370 (50%) received nintedanib (268 [72%] female and 102 [28%] male patients) and 376 (50%) received placebo (255 [68%] female and 121 (32%] male patients); and 1554 patients with other ILDs (437 [28%J female, 1117 [72%] male; 1061 [68%] with IPF), of whom 888 (57%) received nintedanib (237 [27%] female and 651 [73%] male patients) and 666 (43%) received placebo (200 [30%]female and 466 [70%] male patients). Of 102 male and 268 female patients with autoimmune disease-related ILDs treated with nintedanib, nausea was reported in 21 (21%) male and 92 (34%) female patients, vomiting in 12 (12%) male and 73 (27%) female patients, alanine aminotransferase increase in four (4%) male and 31(12%) female patients, aspartate aminotransferase increase in three (3%) male and 23 (9%) female patients, and adverse events leading to dose reduction in 18 (18%) male and 101 (38%) female patients; 28 (27%) male and 107 (40%) female patients had at least one treatment interruption. Of 651 male and 237 female nintedanib-treated patients with other ILDs, nausea was reported in 135 (21%) male and 95 (40%) female patients, vomiting in 51 (8%) male and 70 (30%) female patients, alanine aminotransferase increase in 19 (3%) male and 31 (13%) female patients, aspartate aminotransferase increase in 17 (3%) male and 26 (11%) female patients, and adverse events leading to dose reduction in 106 (16%) male and 84 (35%) female patients; 155 (24%) male and 82 (35%) female patients had at least one treatment interruption. The proportions of patients with adverse events leading to discontinuation of nintedanib were similar between female and male patients with autoimmune disease-related ILDs (44 [16%] of 268 vs 17 [17%] of 102), but were greater among female than male patients with other ILDs (62 [26%] of 237 vs 112 [17%] of 651). Across subgroups by diagnosis and sex, diarrhoea was the most frequent adverse event associated with nintedanib (autoimmune-related ILDs: 198 [74%] of 268 female and 73 [72%] of 102 male patients; other ILDs: 155 [65%] of 237 female and 408 [63%] of 651 male patients), and was the event that most frequently led to treatment discontinuation (autoimmune-related ILDs: 20 [7%] female and five [5%] male patients; other ILDs: 16 [7%] female and 27 [4%] male patients).Interpretation The adverse event profile of nintedanib was generally similar between male and female patients with autoimmune disease-related ILDs, and between male and female patients with other ILDs, but nausea, vomiting, liver enzyme elevations, dose reductions, and treatment interruptions were more frequent in female patients than in male patients. Sex should be considered in the monitoring and management of adverse events that might be associated with nintedanib. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Hoffmann-Vold, A.M.; Distler, O.; Bruni, C.; Denton, C.P.; Vries-Bouwstra, J. de; Cerinic, M.M.; ... ; Gabrielli, A. 2022
The COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the biggest challenges of the 21st century. In addition to the general effect on society and health-care systems, patients with systemic sclerosis and their... Show moreThe COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the biggest challenges of the 21st century. In addition to the general effect on society and health-care systems, patients with systemic sclerosis and their physicians face specific challenges related to the chronic nature of their disease, the involvement of multiple organs, and the use of immunosuppressive treatments. Data from registries and single centre cohorts indicate that the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to increase substantially in people with systemic sclerosis; conversely, severe COVID-19 outcomes are seen more frequently in these patients than in the general population. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is therefore highly recommended for patients with systemic sclerosis; however, no specific recommendations are available regarding the different vaccine platforms. Both patients and physicians should be aware that the effectiveness of vaccines might be reduced in patients taking immunosuppressive therapy, because antibody responses might be blunted, specifically in patients treated with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil. Show less
Background: Concerns have been raised regarding the risks of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with immunosuppressants,... Show moreBackground: Concerns have been raised regarding the risks of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with immunosuppressants, but clinical data on breakthrough infections are still scarce. The primary objective of this study was to compare the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections between patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases using immunosuppressants, and controls (patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases not taking immunosuppressants and healthy controls) who had received full COVID-19 vaccinations. The secondary objective was to explore determinants of breakthrough infections of the delta (B.1.617.2) variant of SARS-CoV-2, including humoral immune responses after vaccination. Methods: In this substudy, we pooled data collected in two large ongoing prospective multicentre cohort studies conducted in the Netherlands (Target to-B! [T2B!] study and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center COVID [ARC-COVID] study). Both studies recruited adult patients (age >= 18 years) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and healthy controls. We sourced clinical data from standardised electronic case record forms, digital questionnaires, and medical files. We only included individuals who were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. For T2B!, participants were recruited between Feb 2 and Aug 1, 2021, and for ARC-COVID, participants were recruited between April 26, 2020, and March 1, 2021. In this study we assessed data on breakthrough infections collected between July 1 and Dec 15, 2021, a period in which the delta SARS-CoV-2 variant was the dominant variant in the Netherlands. We defined a SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection as a PCR-confirmed or antigen test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection that occurred at least 14 days after vaccination. All breakthrough infections during this period were assumed to be due to the delta variant due to its dominance during the study period. We analysed post-vaccination serum samples for anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies to assess the humoral vaccination response (T2B! study only) and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies to identify asymptomatic breakthrough infections (ARC-COVID study only). We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to explore potential clinical and humoral determinants associated with the odds of breakthrough infections. The T2B! study is registered with the Dutch Trial Register, Trial ID NL8900, and the ARC-COVID study is registered with Dutch Trial Register, trial ID NL8513. Findings: We included 3207 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who receive immunosuppressants, and 1807 controls (985 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease not on immunosuppressants and 822 healthy controls). Among patients receiving immunosuppressants, mean age was 53 years (SD 14), 2042 (64%) of 3207 were female and 1165 (36%) were male; among patients not receiving immunosuppressants, mean age was 54 years (SD 14), 598 (61%) of 985 were female and 387 (39%) were male; and among healthy controls, mean age was 57 years (SD 13), 549 (67%) of 822 were female and 273 (33%) were male. The cumulative incidence of PCR-test or antigen-test confirmed SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections was similar in patients on immunosuppressants (148 of 3207; 4.6% [95% CI 3.9-5.4]), patients not on immunosuppressants (52 of 985; 5.3% [95% CI 4.0-6.9]), and healthy controls (33 of 822; 4.0% [95% CI 2.8-5.6]). There was no difference in the odds of breakthrough infection for patients with immune-mediate inflammatory disease on immunosuppressants versus combined controls (ie, patients not on immunosuppressants and healthy controls; adjusted odds ratio 0.88 [95% CI 0.66-1.18]). Seroconversion after vaccination (odds ratio 0.58 [95% CI 0.34-0.98]; T2B! cohort only) and SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination (0.34 [0.18-0.56]) were associated with a lower odds of breakthrough infections. Interpretation: The incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases on immunosuppressants was similar to that in controls. However, caution might still be warranted for those on anti-CD20 therapy and those with traditional risk factors. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Background: Disease-specific studies have reported impaired humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders treated with specific... Show moreBackground: Disease-specific studies have reported impaired humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders treated with specific immunosuppressants. Diseaseoverarching studies, and data on recall responses and third vaccinations are scarce. Our primary objective was to investigate the effects of immunosuppressive monotherapies on the humoral immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with prevalent immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Methods: We did a cohort study in participants treated in outpatient clinics in seven university hospitals and one rheumatology treatment centre in the Netherlands as well as participants included in two national cohort studies on COVID-19-related disease severity. We included patients aged older than 18 years, diagnosed with any of the prespecified immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, who were able to understand and complete questionnaires in Dutch. Participants with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders who were not on systemic immunosuppressants and healthy participants were included as controls. Anti-receptor binding domain IgG responses and neutralisation capacity were monitored following standard vaccination regimens and a three-vaccination regimen in subgroups. Hybrid immune responses-ie, vaccination after previous SARS-CoV-2 infection-were studied as a proxy for recall responses. Findings: Between Feb 2 and Aug 1, 2021, we included 3222 participants in our cohort. Sera from 2339 participants, 1869 without and 470 participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed (mean age 49.9 years [SD 13 center dot 7]; 1470 [62.8%] females and 869 [37.2%] males). Humoral responses did not differ between disorders. Anti-CD20 therapy, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1P) modulators, and mycophenolate mofetil combined with corticosteroids were associated with lower relative risks for reaching seroconversion following standard vaccination (0.32 [95% CI 0.19-0.49] for anti-CD20 therapy, 0.35 [0.21-0.55] for S1P modulators, and 0.61 [0.40-0.90] for mycophenolate mofetil combined with corticosteroids). A third vaccination increased seroconversion for mycophenolate mofetil combination treatments (from 52.6% after the second vaccination to 89.5% after the third) but not significantly for anti-CD20 therapies (from 36.8% to 45.6%) and S1P modulators (from 35.5% to 48.4%). Most other immunosuppressant groups showed moderately reduced antibody titres after standard vaccination that did not increase after a third vaccination, although seroconversion rates and neutralisation capacity were unaffected. In participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were boosted after vaccination, regardless of immunosuppressive treatment. Interpretation: Humoral responses following vaccination are impaired by specific immunosuppressants. After standard vaccination regimens, patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders taking most immunosuppressants show similar seroconversion to controls, although antibody titres might be moderately reduced. As neutralisation capacity and recall responses are also preserved in these patients, this is not likely to translate to loss of (short-term) protection. In patients on immunosuppressants showing poor humoral responses after standard vaccination regimens, a third vaccination resulted in additional seroconversion in patients taking mycophenolate mofetil combination treatments, whereas the effect of a third vaccination in patients on anti-CD20 therapy and S1P modulators was limited. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Wesemael, T.J. van; Huizinga, T.W.J.; Toes, R.E.M.; Woude, D. van der 2022
Background A range of anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPAs) are associated with rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the relationship between AMPA profiles and radiographic progression in... Show moreBackground A range of anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPAs) are associated with rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the relationship between AMPA profiles and radiographic progression in patients with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis.Methods In this cohort study, we obtained samples and data from the Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA) inception cohort and biobank, which recruited patients with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis or undifferentiated arthritis who had at least one swollen joint from 20 hospitals across Scotland. AMPAs in plasma samples were measured by ELISAs at baseline. Paired radiographs of the hands and feet were taken at baseline and at 1 year and were scored with the Sharp-van der Heijde (SvH) method. We calculated differences in radiographic progression using estimated marginal mean changes between baseline and 1 year, with the baseline values of radiographic variables, rheumatoid factor, sex, age at recruitment, symptom duration, and Disease Activity Score 28 with C-reactive protein included as covariates.Findings Between March 1, 2011, and April, 30, 2015, 1073 patients were recruited to the SERA study. 362 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were included in our study and had their AMPA profiles determined. Patients were grouped into four main autoantibody profiles by reactivities to post-translational modifications: single positivity for anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs; 73 [20%]); double positivity for ACPAs and anti-acetylated peptide antibodies (AAPAs; 45 [12%]); triple positivity for ACPAs, AAPAs, and anti-carbamylated peptide antibodies (151 [42%]); and AMPA negativity (74 [20%]). 19 (5%) patients were in one of the minor autoantibody groups. Of the 233 patients with both antibody data and radiographs of sufficient quality, triple-positive patients had more radiographic progression between baseline and 12 months (estimated mean change in total SvH score 1.8, 95% CI 0.9-2.6, SE 0.4) than did single-positive patients (0.5, 0.1-1.0, 0.2; estimated mean difference in the total change in SvH score 1.2, 95% CI 0.1-2.4, SE 0.5). There was no difference in radiographic progression between single positive patients and AMPA negative patients (estimated mean change in total SvH score 0.7, 95% CI 0.1-1.4, SE 0.3; estimated mean difference in the total change in SvH score -0.2, 95% CI -1.1 to 0.7, SE 0.4).Interpretation This study suggests that the optimal prediction of future rates of radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis will require an assessment of autoantibodies against multiple post-translationally modified proteins or peptides. Copyright (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
