The effect of institutional proximity (defined as the applicant having the same current and/or future institutional affiliation as one of the panelists) is measured. We find that the probability to... Show moreThe effect of institutional proximity (defined as the applicant having the same current and/or future institutional affiliation as one of the panelists) is measured. We find that the probability to get funded increases significantly. At the same time, the effect differs between disciplines and countries, and men profit more of it than women do. Show less
Besselaar, P. van den; Schiffbaenker, H.; Sandström, U.; Mom, M. 2018
To explain lower success rates of female applicants in ERC grants, we collected data about past performance of the applicants, and we interviewed panel members about how selection criteria are... Show moreTo explain lower success rates of female applicants in ERC grants, we collected data about past performance of the applicants, and we interviewed panel members about how selection criteria are practiced in general and specifically for female vs. male applicants. Controlling for several past performance variables, we still do find gender bias – more often in favor of men than of women. The analysis of the interviews provides empirical evidence that current evaluation practices indeed are not at all optimal, leading to gender-biased practices and outcomes. Show less
