Landmark studies demonstrating a reduction in onward HIV transmission and improved survival have informed a shift in global antiretroviral therapy policy to a ‘treat all’ approach. Global HIV... Show moreLandmark studies demonstrating a reduction in onward HIV transmission and improved survival have informed a shift in global antiretroviral therapy policy to a ‘treat all’ approach. Global HIV stakeholders have called on countries to urgently scale up their HIV programs, involving responsibilities for various health system actors for accelerating HIV epidemic control. In this article we explore how community members in South Africa who were part of a large-scale ‘Universal Testing and Treatment’ trial made decisions around taking up home-based HIV testing, a major component of the trial's intervention and the entry point to a comprehensive continuum of HIV prevention and care. Drawing on data collected with a qualitative cohort of purposively selected households in the study intervention communities between 2016 and 2018 we describe how the goal of achieving HIV epidemic control was internalized, enacted, and potentially transformed in the interactions between community members and health workers in high HIV burden community settings. Further, we consider the implications for how community members related to their individual health and a collective responsibility to a broader public health good (in this case HIV epidemic control). Our findings suggest that in contexts of precarity – where there is low social cohesion – a community-wide health intervention can create an avenue for people to perform being good, moral citizens. Our findings reveal how complex community and social dynamics inform decisions to take up health interventions, rather than purely ‘rational’ understandings of individual and collective health benefit. Show less
AbstractIntroductionPeople with dementia from migrant and ethnic minority (MEM) groups often receive suboptimal care. Differences in perceptions, values and preferences, and linguistic barriers may... Show moreAbstractIntroductionPeople with dementia from migrant and ethnic minority (MEM) groups often receive suboptimal care. Differences in perceptions, values and preferences, and linguistic barriers may complicate communication between persons with dementia, their families and healthcare professionals. Metaphor analysis can provide unique insight into the lifeworld of people with dementia and their informal caregivers. This study identified the metaphors with which informal caregivers of persons with dementia from diverse cultural-linguistic backgrounds understand and discuss dementia.MethodsWe conducted 7 focus groups (n = 42) and 12 interviews (n = 13) with informal caregivers of persons with dementia living in the Netherlands from six different cultural backgrounds: Dutch, Chinese, Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, and Dutch-Antillean. Interviews, in the native tongue of participants, were analyzed for the presence of direct and indirect metaphor.ResultsThe results indicate a conspicuous lack of metaphor to reflect on the nature and experience of having dementia. Two typical conceptual metaphors in health communication (journey/war) are virtually absent in all MEM groups. Furthermore, results suggest a one-sided and negative outlook on dementia, with an emphasis on persons with dementia as ‘childlike’ or ‘crazy’.ConclusionOur results suggest a lack of extensively available sophisticated (metaphorical) language to consider daily life with persons with dementia. There is a clear need to address the stigma and lack of medical knowledge surrounding dementia in these MEM groups and to carry out more cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research to explore which metaphors aid understanding and lead to the empowerment and restoration of self-worth of people with dementia. Show less
