Objective: The objective of this study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity in axial SpA (axSpA) and nonaxSpA patients with chronic back pain of <2 years.... Show moreObjective: The objective of this study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity in axial SpA (axSpA) and nonaxSpA patients with chronic back pain of <2 years. Methods: Baseline and 2-year data for patients included in the SPondyloArthritis Caught Early cohort were analysed. HRQoL was assessed by the physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and presenteeism, absenteeism, work productivity loss (WPL) and activity impairment (AI) by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Linear or zero-inflated negative binomial regression was conducted to compare 2-year outcomes between groups (axSpA and non-axSpA), adjusting for the baseline value, sex, age and use of NSAIDs. Results: There were 265 axSpA and 108 non-axSpA patients: males 52% vs 26%, mean age 29 vs 31 years, respectively. At baseline, nonaxSpA patients showed worse PCS (mean 28.6 axSpA vs 26.6 non-axSpA), presenteeism (31.1% vs 37.3%), absenteeism (8.2% vs 10.3%), WPL (34.7% vs 44.1%) and AI (39.6% vs 48.5%). MCS was not impaired in either group. After 2 years, PCS, presenteeism, WPL and AI significantly improved in both groups; absenteeism only improved in axSpA. In multivariable analysis, axSpA (vs non-axSpA) was associated with 22% less WPL [incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 0.78 (0.62; 0.98)] and 18% less AI [0.82 (0.69; 0.97)]. Conclusion: HRQoL and work productivity are more impaired in non-axSpA (vs axSpA) at baseline and also after 2 years. Although most outcomes improve in both groups, axSpA is associated with larger reductions in WPL and AI. Show less
Boeren, A.M.P.; Oei, E.H.G.; Willemze, A.; Jong, P.H.P. de; Mil, A.H.M.V.; Mulligen, E. van 2024
ObjectiveUS can detect subclinical joint-inflammation in patients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA), which is valuable as predictor for RA development. In most research protocols both hands... Show moreObjectiveUS can detect subclinical joint-inflammation in patients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA), which is valuable as predictor for RA development. In most research protocols both hands and forefeet are scanned, but it is unclear if US of the forefeet has additional value for predicting RA, especially since synovial hypertrophy in MTP-joints of healthy individuals is also common. To explore the possibility to omit scanning of the forefeet we determined if US of the forefeet is of additional predictive value for RA-development in CSA patients.MethodsCSA patients of two independent cohorts underwent US of the hands and forefeet. We analysed the association between RA-development and US-positivity for the full US-protocol, the full US-protocol with correction for gray scale (GS)-findings in the forefeet of healthy and the protocol without forefeet.ResultsIn total, 298 CSA patients were studied. In patients with a positive US, subclinical joint-inflammation was mostly present in the hands (90–86%). Only 10–14% of patients had subclinical joint-inflammation solely in the forefeet. US-positivity was associated with inflammatory arthritis development in both cohorts, with HRs 2.6 (95% CI 0.9–7.5) and 3.1 (95% CI 1.5–6.4) for the full protocol, 3.1 (95% CI 1.3–7.7) and 2.7 (95% CI 1.3–5.4) for the full US-protocol with correction, and 3.1 (95% CI 1.4–6.9) and 2.8 (95% CI 1.4–5.6) without the forefeet. AUROCs were equal across both cohorts.ConclusionThe forefeet can be omitted when US is used for the prediction of RA-development in CSA patients. This is due to the finding that subclinical joint-inflammation in the forefeet without concomitant inflammation in the hands is infrequent. Show less
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of long-term, personalized, supervised exercise therapy on functional ability compared with usual care in people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and... Show moreObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of long-term, personalized, supervised exercise therapy on functional ability compared with usual care in people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and severe functional limitations.MethodsParticipants were randomly 1:1 assigned to the intervention [maximal 64 sessions, with 14 additional optional sessions of supervised active exercise therapy (e.g. aerobic and muscle strengthening) with individualized goal-setting, education and self-management regarding physical activity] or usual care (care determined by clinician(s) and participants themselves). Primary endpoint was the change in the Patient-Specific Complaints activity ranked 1 [PSC1 (0–10)] at 52 weeks. Secondary endpoints were the PSC activities ranked 2 and 3, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, 6-min walk test, Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function-10 and the Short Form-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary Score (SF-36 PCS and MCS). Statistical comparisons comprised independent student t-tests and linear mixed models, based on intention-to-treat.Results214 participants [49% female, age 52 (S.D. 12) years], were randomized to the intervention (n = 110) or usual care (n = 104) group. In the intervention group 93% started treatment, using on average 40.5 sessions (S.D. 15.1). At 52 weeks, the difference in change in PSC1 between groups favoured the intervention group [mean difference (95% CI); −1.8 (−2.4 to −1.2)]. Additionally, all secondary outcomes, except the SF-36 MSC, showed significantly greater improvements in the intervention group with effect sizes ranging from 0.4 to 0.7.ConclusionLong-term, supervised exercise therapy proved more effective than usual care in improving functional disability and physical quality of life in people with axSpA and severe functional limitations.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NL8238, included in the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL8238). Show less
ObjectivesTo assess disease outcomes after 20 and 12 years of patients with RA or undifferentiated arthritis (UA), treated-to-target in the BeSt and IMPROVED trials.MethodsIn BeSt (inclusion 2000... Show moreObjectivesTo assess disease outcomes after 20 and 12 years of patients with RA or undifferentiated arthritis (UA), treated-to-target in the BeSt and IMPROVED trials.MethodsIn BeSt (inclusion 2000–02, duration 10 years), 508 patients with early RA were randomized to: 1. sequential monotherapy, 2. step-up combination therapy, 3. initial csDMARD combination therapy, 4. initial bDMARD/csDMARD combination therapy. The treatment target was low disease activity (DAS ≤ 2.4).In IMPROVED (inclusion 2007–10, duration 5 years), 610 patients with early RA/UA started MTX with prednisone bridging. The treatment target was remission (DAS < 1.6). Patients not in early remission were randomized to 1. csDMARD combination therapy or 2. bDMARD/csDMARD combination therapy.Between 2019 and 22, these patients were invited for long-term follow-up.ResultsOne-hundred-fifty-three ex-Best and 282 ex-IMPROVED patients participated in the follow-up study after a median of 12 and 20 years since the study started.In ex-BeSt and ex-IMPROVED patients, the rate of low disease activity was 91%, and 68% were in DAS remission. Median SHS was 14.0 in ex-BeSt (IQR 6.0–32.5; progression since end BeSt 6.0, IQR 2.0–12.5) and 8 in ex-IMPROVED participants (IQR 3–16; progression since end IMPROVED 4, IQR 2–9). Mean HAQ was 0.8 ± 0.6 in ex-BeSt (change since end BeSt: 0.3 ± 0.5) and 0.6 ± 0.6 in ex-IMPROVED participants (change since end IMPROVED: 0.06 ± 0.5).ConclusionAt 12/20 years after treatment started, the majority of RA and UA patients who had been treated to target low DAS or DAS remission were in DAS remission and had limited functional disability. Radiographic damage progression was mild although not completely suppressed. Show less
Takase-Minegishi, K.; Boehringer, S.; Nam, J.L.; Kaneko, Y.; Behrens, F.; Saevarsdottir, S.; ... ; Woude, D. van der 2024
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of bDMARDs in patients with RA with RF/ACPA compared with patients without these autoantibodies.MethodsPrevious systematic literature reviews performed by EULAR... Show moreObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of bDMARDs in patients with RA with RF/ACPA compared with patients without these autoantibodies.MethodsPrevious systematic literature reviews performed by EULAR RA management task forces were searched for qualifying RCTs. RCTs investigating the efficacy of bDMARDs and including both autoantibody-positive (≤80% of total population) and -negative RA patients were eligible. For trials comparing bDMARD+csDMARD vs csDMARD, relative risks (RR) comparing two groups (RF+ vs RF-, ACPA+ vs ACPA-) were calculated for efficacy outcomes for each arm. Subsequently, relative risk ratios (RRRs) were computed, as the ratio of RR of the bDMARD-arm and the RR from the non-bDMARD-arm. Pooled effects were obtained with random effect meta-analyses.ResultsData from 28 eligible RCTs were analysed, pooling 23 studies in three subgroups: six including csDMARD-naive patients, 14 csDMARD-IR and three TNFi-IR patients. In csDMARD-naive and csDMARD-IR patients, seropositivity was not associated with a better response to bDMARDs: pooled 6-month ACR20 RRRs 1.02 (0.88–1.18) and 1.09 (0.90–1.32), respectively. Other outcomes showed no difference between groups either. In TNFi-IR patients, based on three trials, the 6-month ACR20 RRR was 2.28 (1.31–3.95), favoring efficacy in seropositive patients. Other outcomes mostly showed no significant difference between the groups. Based on the mode of action, efficacy was comparable between RF-positive and RF-negative patients for both TNFi and non-TNFi treatment and also for the individual bDMARDs.ConclusionThe effect of bDMARDs is generally comparable in patients with and without RF/ACPA, regardless of the patient population, the mechanism of action or individual drug used. Show less
Objectives: To a) identify threshold values of presenteeism measurement instruments that reflect unacceptable work state in employed r-axSpA patients; b) determine whether those thresholds... Show moreObjectives: To a) identify threshold values of presenteeism measurement instruments that reflect unacceptable work state in employed r-axSpA patients; b) determine whether those thresholds accurately predict future adverse work outcomes (AWO) (sick leave or short/long-term disability); c) evaluate the performance of traditional health-outcomes for r-axSpA; d) explore whether thresholds are stable across contextual factors. Methods: Data from the multinational AS-PROSE study was used. Thresholds to determine whether patients consider themselves in an 'unacceptable work state' were calculated at baseline for four instruments assessing presenteeism and two health-outcomes specific for r-axSpA. Different approaches derived from the receiver operating characteristic methodology were used. Validity of the optimal thresholds was tested across contextual factors and for predicting future AWO over 12 months. Results: Of 366 working patients, 15% reported an unacceptable work state; 6% experienced at least one AWO in 12 months. Optimal thresholds were: WPAI-presenteeism >= 40 (AUC 0.85), QQ-method <97 (0.76), WALS >= 0.75 (AUC 0.87), WLQ-25 >= 29 (AUC 0.85). BASDAI and BASFI performed similarly to the presenteeism instruments: >= 4.7 (AUC 0.82) and >= 3.5 (AUC 0.79), respectively. Thresholds for WALS and WLQ-25 were stable across contextual factors, while for all other instruments they overestimated unacceptable work state in lower educated persons. Proposed thresholds could also predict future AWO, although with lower performance, especially for QQ-method, BASDAI and BASFI. Conclusions: Thresholds of measurement instruments for presenteeism and health status to identify unacceptable work state have been established. These thresholds can help in daily clinical practice to provide work related support to r-axSpA patients at risk for AWO. Show less
Khidir, S.J.H.; Krijbolder, D.; Glas, H.K.; Mulligen, E. van; Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. van der 2024
Objectives ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA differ in underlying risk factors but have a similar clinical presentation at RA diagnosis. It is unknown what the ACPA-associated differences or... Show moreObjectives ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA differ in underlying risk factors but have a similar clinical presentation at RA diagnosis. It is unknown what the ACPA-associated differences or similarities are during the symptomatic at-risk stage of RA, i.e. clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA). To deepen insights into these differences/similarities, we compared the course of symptoms/impairments and subclinical joint inflammation in the CSA phase during progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA) or to CSA resolution.Methods A total of 845 CSA patients were followed for a median of 24 months; 136 patients developed IA and an additional 355/505 patients had resolution of CSA according to rheumatologists. Patient burden (pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, functional disabilities, presenteeism) was assessed at baseline and 4, 12 and 24 months and at IA development. Subclinical joint inflammation in the hands and feet was assessed over time with 1.5T MRI. Linear and Poisson mixed models were used.Results In both ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients, patient burden increased towards IA development and decreased towards CSA resolution. However, patient burden was lower in ACPA-positive vs ACPA-negative disease at all timepoints. Conversely, subclinical joint inflammation tended to increase more rapidly during development of ACPA-positive IA [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.52 (95% CI 0.94, 2.47), P = 0.089] and remained higher over time in ACPA-positive CSA patients achieving resolution compared with ACPA-negative patients [IRR 1.52 (95% CI 1.07, 2.15), P = 0.018]. Although correlation coefficients between changes in patient burden and subclinical joint inflammation during progression to IA were weak, they were consistently higher in ACPA-positive than ACPA-negative disease, e.g. rho = 0.29 vs 0.12 for functional disabilities.Conclusion During RA development and CSA resolution, ACPA-positive CSA patients have lower patient burden but more subclinical joint inflammation than ACPA-negative CSA patients. These data strengthen the notion that the development of ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA is pathophysiologically different and encourage further research on these differences. Show less
Boeren, A.M.P.; Khidir, S.J.H.; Jong, P.H.P. de; Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. van der; Mulligen, E. van 2023
ObjectivePatients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) are at risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). These patients often report joint swelling while this is not objectified by physical... Show moreObjectivePatients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) are at risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). These patients often report joint swelling while this is not objectified by physical examination. To explore the value of patient-reported swelling in CSA, we aimed to determine its association with subclinical joint inflammation on imaging and RA development.MethodsIn two independent, similarly designed CSA cohorts from the Netherlands, symptomatic patients at risk for RA were studied. At baseline, patients indicated whether they had experienced swelling in hand joints. Subclinical joint inflammation was assessed with MRI or US. Patients were followed for inflammatory arthritis development.ResultsIn total, 534 CSA patients from two independent cohorts were studied, and patient-reported swelling was present in 57% in cohort 1 and in 43% in cohort 2. In both cohorts patient-reported swelling was associated with subclinical joint inflammation. Using MRI, it associated specifically with tenosynovitis (odds ratio [OR] 3.7 [95% CI: 2.0, 6.9]) and when using US with synovitis (OR 2.3 [95% CI: 1.04, 5.3]). CSA patients with self-reported swelling at baseline developed arthritis more often, with hazard ratios of 3.7 (95% CI: 2.0, 6.9) and 3.4 (95% CI: 1.4, 8.4) in cohort 1 and 2, respectively. This was independent of clinical predictors (e.g. morning stiffness), autoantibody positivity and US-detected subclinical joint inflammation. However, when corrected for MRI-detected subclinical joint inflammation, self-reported swelling was no longer an independent predictor.ConclusionPatient-reported joint swelling in CSA relates to subclinical joint inflammation and is an independent risk factor for RA development, but it is less predictive than the presence of MRI-detected subclinical joint inflammation. Show less
ObjectivesThe severity of fatigue in RA has improved very little in recent decades, leaving a large unmet need. Fortunately, not all RA patients suffer from persistent fatigue, but the subgroup of... Show moreObjectivesThe severity of fatigue in RA has improved very little in recent decades, leaving a large unmet need. Fortunately, not all RA patients suffer from persistent fatigue, but the subgroup of patients who suffer the most is insufficiently recognizable at diagnosis. As disease activity is partly coupled to fatigue, DAS components may associate with the course of fatigue. We aimed to identify those RA patients who remain fatigued by studying DAS components at diagnosis in relation to the course of fatigue over a 5-year follow-up period in two independent early RA cohorts.MethodsIn all, 1560 consecutive RA patients included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Cohort and 415 RA patients included in the tREACH trial were studied. Swollen joint count, tender joint count, ESR and Patient Global Assessment (PGA) [on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] were studied in relation to fatigue (VAS, 0–100 mm) over a period of 5 years, using linear mixed models.ResultsHigher tender joint count and higher PGA at diagnosis were associated with a more severe course of fatigue. Furthermore, patients with mono- or oligo-arthritis at diagnosis remained more fatigued. The swollen joint count, in contrast, showed an inverse association. An investigation of combinations of the aforementioned characteristics revealed that patients presenting with mono- or oligo-arthritis and PGA ≥ 50 remained the most fatigued over time (+20 mm vs polyarthritis with PGA < 50), while the DAS course over time did not differ. This subgroup comprised 14% of the early RA population. Data from the tREACH trial showed similar findings.ConclusionThe RA patients who remain the most fatigued were those characterized by mono- or oligo-arthritis and high PGA (VAS ≥ 50) at diagnosis. This understanding may enable early-intervention with non-pharmacological approaches in dedicated patient groups. Show less
Hollander, N.K. den; Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. van der; Steenbergen, H.W. van 2023
ObjectiveObesity conveys a risk for RA development, while paradoxically, associating with less radiographic progression after RA diagnosis. Using MRI we can study this surprising association in... Show moreObjectiveObesity conveys a risk for RA development, while paradoxically, associating with less radiographic progression after RA diagnosis. Using MRI we can study this surprising association in detail from MRI-detected synovitis and osteitis to MRI-detected erosive progression, which precedes radiographic progression. Previous research suggested obesity associates with less osteitis and synovitis. We therefore aimed to (i) validate the previously suggested association between BMI and MRI-detected osteitis/synovitis; (ii) study whether this is specific for ACPA-positive or ACPA-negative RA or also present in other arthritides; (iii) study whether MRI-detected osteitis associates with MRI-detected erosive progression; and (iv) study whether obesity associates with MRI-detected erosive progression.MethodsWe studied 1029 early arthritis patients (454 RA, 575 other arthritides), consecutively included in Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic. At baseline patients underwent hand-and-foot MRI that were RAMRIS-scored, and 149 RA patients underwent follow-up MRIs. We studied associations between baseline BMI and MRI-detected osteitis/synovitis (using linear regression), and erosive progression (using Poisson mixed models).ResultsIn RA, higher BMI associated with less osteitis at disease onset (β = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.96) but not with synovitis. Higher BMI associated with less osteitis in ACPA-positive RA (β = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.97), ACPA-negative RA (β = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99) and other arthritides (β = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). Over 2 years, overweight and obesity associated with less MRI-detected erosive progression (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). Osteitis also associated with erosive progression over 2 years (P < 0.001).ConclusionsHigh BMI relates to less osteitis at disease onset, which is not confined to RA. Within RA, high BMI and less osteitis associated with less MRI-detected erosive progression. This suggests that the protective effect of obesity on radiographic progression is exerted via a path of less osteitis and subsequently fewer MRI-detected erosions. Show less
Objectives: Autoantibody responses increase years before the onset of inflammatory arthritis (IA) and are stable during transitioning from clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) to IA. Cytokine and... Show moreObjectives: Autoantibody responses increase years before the onset of inflammatory arthritis (IA) and are stable during transitioning from clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) to IA. Cytokine and chemokine levels also increase years before IA onset. However, the course in the at-risk stage of CSA during progression to disease or non-progression is unknown. To increase the understanding of processes mediating disease development, we studied the course of cytokine, chemokine and related receptors gene expression in CSA patients during progression to IA and in CSA patients who ultimately did not develop IA. Methods: Whole-blood RNA expression of 37 inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and related receptors was determined by dual-colour reverse transcription multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in paired samples of CSA patients at CSA onset and either at IA development or after 24 months without IA development. ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative CSA patients developing IA were compared at CSA onset and during progression to IA. Generalised estimating equations tested changes over time. A false discovery rate approach was applied. Results: None of the cytokine/chemokine genes significantly changed in expression between CSA onset and IA development. In CSA patients without IA development, G-CSF expression decreased (P = 0.001), whereas CCR6 and TNIP1 expression increased (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively) over a 2 year period. Expression levels in ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative CSA patients who developed IA were similar. Conclusion: Whole-blood gene expression of assessed cytokines, chemokines and related receptors did not change significantly from CSA to IA development. This suggests that changes in expression of these molecules may not be related to the final process of developing chronicity and may have occurred preceding CSA onset. Changes in gene expression in CSA patients without IA development may provide clues for processes related to resolution. Show less
Objectives: To investigate pain, pain trajectories and their determinants in hand osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Data from the HOSTAS (Hand OSTeoArthritis in Secondary care) consisting of... Show moreObjectives: To investigate pain, pain trajectories and their determinants in hand osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Data from the HOSTAS (Hand OSTeoArthritis in Secondary care) consisting of consecutive hand OA patients were used. Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) pain was measured yearly for four years. Patients with complete AUSCAN at >= 2 time points were eligible for longitudinal analysis. Associations between variables of interest and baseline AUSCAN pain were investigated with linear regression. Development of pain over time was modelled using latent class growth analysis (LCGA). Associations of LCGA classes with variables of interest were analysed using multinomial logistic regression adjusted for baseline pain. Results: A total of 484/538 patients [mean (s.d.) age 60.8 (8.5) years, 86% women, mean (s.d.) AUSCAN pain 9.3 (4.3)] were eligible for longitudinal analysis. Sex, marital and working status, education, disease duration and severity, anxiety and depression scores, lower health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), specific illness perceptions and coping styles were associated with baseline pain. LCGA yielded three classes, characterized by average pain levels at baseline; average pain remained stable over time within classes. Classes with more pain were positively associated with BMI, tender joint count, symptom duration, hand function scores and depression scores, negatively with physical HR-QoL, and education level. Conclusion: Baseline pain was associated with patient and disease characteristics, and psychosocial factors. LCGA showed three pain trajectories in hand OA patients, with different baseline pain levels and stable pain over time. Classes were distinguished by BMI, education level, disease severity, depression and HR-QoL. Show less
Ramiro, S.; Landewe, R.; Heijde, D. van der; Sepriano, A.; FitzGerald, O.; Ostergaard, M.; ... ; Maksymowych, W.P. 2023
Objectives: To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start... Show moreObjectives: To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start (new) DMARD-therapy. Methods: Patients with RA from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs because of active RA, and in whom treatment intensification according to the T2T principle was pursued, were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA-BIODAM cohort). The primary outcome was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde (SvdH) score, assessed every 6 months. Per 3-month interval DAS44-T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of two visits). The relation between T2T intensity and change in SvdH-score was modelled by generalized estimating equations. Results: In total, 511 patients were included [mean (s.d.) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female]. Mean 2-year SvdH progression was 2.2 (4.1) units (median: 1 unit). A stricter application of T2T in a 3-month interval did not reduce progression in the same 6-month interval [parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95% CI: -0.04, 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (-0.06; 0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits] nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval. Conclusions: In this daily practice cohort, following T2T principles more meticulously did not result in less radiographic progression than a somewhat more lenient attitude towards T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome. Show less
Ramiro, S.; Landewé, R.; Heijde, D. van der; Sepriano, A.; FitzGerald, O.; Ostergaard, M.; ... ; Maksymowych, W.P. 2023
ObjectivesTo investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start ... Show moreObjectivesTo investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start (new) DMARD-therapy.MethodsPatients with RA from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs because of active RA, and in whom treatment intensification according to the T2T principle was pursued, were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA-BIODAM cohort). The primary outcome was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde (SvdH) score, assessed every 6 months. Per 3-month interval DAS44-T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of two visits). The relation between T2T intensity and change in SvdH-score was modelled by generalized estimating equations.ResultsIn total, 511 patients were included [mean (s.d.) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female]. Mean 2-year SvdH progression was 2.2 (4.1) units (median: 1 unit). A stricter application of T2T in a 3-month interval did not reduce progression in the same 6-month interval [parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95% CI: −0.04, 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (−0.06; 0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits] nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval.ConclusionsIn this daily practice cohort, following T2T principles more meticulously did not result in less radiographic progression than a somewhat more lenient attitude towards T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome. Show less
Wang, Q.K.; Runhaar, J.; Kloppenburg, M.; Boers, M.; Bijlsma, J.W.J.; Bacardit, J.; ... ; CREDO Experts Grp 2022
Objectives To identify highly ranked features related to clinicians' diagnosis of clinically relevant knee OA. Methods General practitioners (GPs) and secondary care physicians (SPs) were recruited... Show moreObjectives To identify highly ranked features related to clinicians' diagnosis of clinically relevant knee OA. Methods General practitioners (GPs) and secondary care physicians (SPs) were recruited to evaluate 5-10 years follow-up clinical and radiographic data of knees from the CHECK cohort for the presence of clinically relevant OA. GPs and SPs were gathered in pairs; each pair consisted of one GP and one SP, and the paired clinicians independently evaluated the same subset of knees. A diagnosis was made for each knee by the GP and SP before and after viewing radiographic data. Nested 5-fold cross-validation enhanced random forest models were built to identify the top 10 features related to the diagnosis. Results Seventeen clinician pairs evaluated 1106 knees with 139 clinical and 36 radiographic features. GPs diagnosed clinically relevant OA in 42% and 43% knees, before and after viewing radiographic data, respectively. SPs diagnosed in 43% and 51% knees, respectively. Models containing top 10 features had good performance for explaining clinicians' diagnosis with area under the curve ranging from 0.76-0.83. Before viewing radiographic data, quantitative symptomatic features (i.e. WOMAC scores) were the most important ones related to the diagnosis of both GPs and SPs; after viewing radiographic data, radiographic features appeared in the top lists for both, but seemed to be more important for SPs than GPs. Conclusions Random forest models presented good performance in explaining clinicians' diagnosis, which helped to reveal typical features of patients recognized as clinically relevant knee OA by clinicians from two different care settings. Show less
Objectives: Around 30% of patients with RA have an inadequate response to MTX. We aimed to use routine clinical and biological data to build machine learning models predicting EULAR inadequate... Show moreObjectives: Around 30% of patients with RA have an inadequate response to MTX. We aimed to use routine clinical and biological data to build machine learning models predicting EULAR inadequate response to MTX and to identify simple predictive biomarkers. Methods: Models were trained on RA patients fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria from the ESPOIR and Leiden EAC cohorts to predict the EULAR response at 9 months (+/- 6 months). Several models were compared on the training set using the AUROC. The best model was evaluated on an external validation cohort (tREACH). The model's predictions were explained using Shapley values to extract a biomarker of inadequate response. Results: We included 493 therapeutic sequences from ESPOIR, 239 from EAC and 138 from tREACH. The model selected DAS28, Lymphocytes, Creatininemia, Leucocytes, AST, ALT, swollen joint count and corticosteroid co-treatment as predictors. The model reached an AUROC of 0.72 [95% CI (0.63, 0.80)] on the external validation set, where 70% of patients were responders to MTX. Patients predicted as inadequate responders had only 38% [95% CI (20%, 58%)] chance to respond and using the algorithm to decide to initiate MTX would decrease inadequate-response rate from 30% to 23% [95% CI: (17%, 29%)]. A biomarker was identified in patients with moderate or high activity (DAS28 > 3.2): patients with a lymphocyte count superior to 2000 cells/mm(3) are significantly less likely to respond. Conclusion: Our study highlights the usefulness of machine learning in unveiling subgroups of inadequate responders to MTX to guide new therapeutic strategies. Further work is needed to validate this approach. Show less
Ortolan, A.; Ramiro, S.; Ramonda, R.; Heijde, D. van der 2022
Objectives: The alternative ASDAS (altASDAS) is an index that can be used when patient global assessment is unavailable. Our aim was to test the truth and discrimination aspects according to... Show moreObjectives: The alternative ASDAS (altASDAS) is an index that can be used when patient global assessment is unavailable. Our aim was to test the truth and discrimination aspects according to OMERACT filter 2.0 of the altASDAS in an external cohort. Methods: Cohorts from the COAST trials of ixekizumab (COAST-V, -W, -X; 16-week primary endpoint) enrolling radiographic/non-radiographic axial SpA patients were pooled. The ASDAS [original formula with patient global assessment (PGA)] and altASDAS were calculated. Truth was assessed by agreement with the continuous ASDAS [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)] and ASDAS disease activity (DA) states (weighted kappa), Bland-Altman plots [mean difference (MD) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA)] and Pearson's correlations between altASDAS/ASDAS and other constructs. Discrimination was tested by the ability of altASDAS to distinguish high/low DA according to nocturnal pain >6/10 as an external anchor and agreement (kappa) with ASDAS in major improvement (MI) and clinically important improvement (CII). Results: A total of 958 patients were included. For truth, agreement with ASDAS was very good (ICC = 0.99, kappa = 0.91), MD with ASDAS was 0.03 (95% LoA -0.31-0.24) and correlation coefficients of altASDAS with related constructs were within a prespecified 0.3-wide band around those between ASDAS and the same construct. For discrimination, the altASDAS discriminated between DA states and agreed with ASDAS response (kappa MI = 0.91, CII = 0.93). Conclusions: The altASDAS was truthful and discriminative in an external cohort and as such has been fully validated to be used in cases when PGA is unavailable. Show less
