Aim: To evaluate the effect of graft preparation and organ-culture storage on endothelial cell density (ECD) and viability of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts. Materials and... Show moreAim: To evaluate the effect of graft preparation and organ-culture storage on endothelial cell density (ECD) and viability of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts. Materials and methods: DMEK grafts (n = 27) were prepared at Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam from 27 corneas (15 donors) that were eligible for transplantation but could not be allocated due to the Covid-19-related cancellation of elective surgeries. Cell viability (by Calcein-AM staining) and ECD of five grafts originally scheduled for transplantation were evaluated on the originally planned surgery day, whereas 22 grafts from paired donor corneas were evaluated either directly post-preparation or after 3-7 days of storage. ECD was analyzed by light microscopy (LM ECD) and Calcein-AM staining (Calcein-ECD). Results: Light microscopy (LM) evaluation of all grafts showed an unremarkable endothelial cell monolayer directly after preparation. However, median Calcein-ECD for the five grafts initially allocated for transplantation was 18% (range 92-73%) lower than median LM ECD. For the paired DMEK grafts, Calcein-ECD determined by Calcein-AM staining on the day of graft preparation and after 3-7 days of graft storage showed a median decrease of 1% and 2%, respectively. Median percentage of central graft area populated by viable cells after preparation and after 3-7 days of graft storage was 88% and 92%, respectively. Conclusion: Cell viability of most of the grafts will not be affected by preparation and storage. Endothelial cell damage may be observed for some grafts within hours after preparation, with insignificant additional ECD changes during 3-7 days of graft storage. Implementing an additional post-preparation step in the eye bank to evaluate cell density before graft release for transplantation may help to reduce postoperative DMEK complications. Show less
Magnetic resonance imaging of the eye and orbit (MReye) is a cross-domain research field, combining (bio)physics, (bio)engineering, physiology, data sciences and ophthalmology. A growing number of... Show moreMagnetic resonance imaging of the eye and orbit (MReye) is a cross-domain research field, combining (bio)physics, (bio)engineering, physiology, data sciences and ophthalmology. A growing number of reports document technical innovations of MReye and promote their application in preclinical research and clinical science. Realizing the progress and promises, this review outlines current trends in MReye. Examples of MReye strategies and their clinical relevance are demonstrated. Frontier applications in ocular oncology, refractive surgery, ocular muscle disorders and orbital inflammation are presented and their implications for explorations into ophthalmic diseases are provided. Substantial progress in anatomically detailed, high-spatial resolution MReye of the eye, orbit and optic nerve is demonstrated. Recent developments in MReye of ocular tumors are explored, and its value for personalized eye models derived from machine learning in the treatment planning of uveal melanoma and evaluation of retinoblastoma is highlighted. The potential of MReye for monitoring drug distribution and for improving treatment management and the assessment of individual responses is discussed. To open a window into the eye and into (patho)physiological processes that in the past have been largely inaccessible, advances in MReye at ultrahigh magnetic field strengths are discussed. A concluding section ventures a glance beyond the horizon and explores future directions of MReye across multiple scales, including in vivo electrolyte mapping of sodium and other nuclei. This review underscores the need for the (bio)medical imaging and ophthalmic communities to expand efforts to find solutions to the remaining unsolved problems and technical obstacles of MReye, with the objective to transfer methodological advancements driven by MR physics into genuine clinical value. Show less
Aim Studying cell migration of corneal endothelial cellsin vitrois challenging because the capacity for cell migration needs to be maintained while at the same time the tissue must remain fixed on... Show moreAim Studying cell migration of corneal endothelial cellsin vitrois challenging because the capacity for cell migration needs to be maintained while at the same time the tissue must remain fixed on a rigid substrate. In this study, we report a thermoresponsive culture technique designed to maintain cellular viability, and to reduce tissue handling in order to analyzein vitroendothelial cell migration from corneal grafts. Materials and Methods As a test tissue, fifteen Quarter-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (Q-DMEK) grafts were used that were embedded in a three-dimensional culture system using a temperature-reversible hydrogel and cultured over 2-3 weeks in a humidified atmosphere at 37 degrees C and 5% CO2. Results All grafts could be successfully cultured inside the thermoresponsive polymer solution for periods of up to 21 days. Using this system, cell migration could be assessed by light microscopy at fixed time intervals. At the end of the culture period, the gel could be removed from all grafts and immunohistochemistry analysis showed that endothelial cells were able to maintain confluence, viability, and junctional integrity. Some problems were encountered when using the thermoresponsive cell culture system. These were mostly structural inconsistencies during the sol-to-gel transition phase that resulted in the formation of tiny bubbles in the matrix. Additionally, areas with different viscosity resulted in optical distortions showing up as folds throughout the matrix which can persist even after several cycles of culture medium exchange. These effects had impact on the imaging quality but did not affect the viability of the explant tissue. Conclusion This study proves that temperature-reversible hydrogel is a very useful matrix for studyingin vitrocorneal endothelial cell migration from explant grafts and allows for subsequent biological investigation after gel removal. Show less
Aim: To test the feasibility of implanting human anterior lens capsules (HALCs) with porcine corneal endothelial cells (pCEC) in vivo in Gottingen minipigs and at the same time test the suitability... Show moreAim: To test the feasibility of implanting human anterior lens capsules (HALCs) with porcine corneal endothelial cells (pCEC) in vivo in Gottingen minipigs and at the same time test the suitability of Gottingen minipig as model for endothelial keratoplasty. Materials and Methods: Cell-carrier constructs of decellularized HALC with cultured (pCEC) were created for implementation in vivo. Eight Gottingen minipigs (6 months old) underwent surgery with descemetorhexis or removal of endothelium by scraping and implementation of HALC without (animal 1-4) and with (animal 5-8) pCEC. Follow-up examinations included optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging (1,2 and 3 months) and slit-lamp examination (<1 week as well as 1,2 and 3 months). Results: Intraoperative challenges included difficulties in maintaining an anterior chamber due to soft tissue and vitreous pressure, development of corneal edema and difficulties removing Descemet's membrane because of strong adhesion to stroma. Therefore, descemetorhexis was replaced by mechanical scraping of the endothelium in animal 4-8. HALCs without pCEC were implanted in animal 1-4. Apposition to the back surface was not achieved in animal 1 and 3 because of corneal edema and poor visibility. Animal 5 was sacrificed because of a lens capsule tear. HALCs with pCEC were implanted in animal 6-8. Slit-lamp examination the first week revealed corneal edema in all animals, although mild in animals 4. One-month examination showed retrocorneal membranes with overlying corneal edema in all animals. Histology showed fibrosis in the AC and on the back surface of the cornea, compatible with the clinical diagnosis of retrocorneal membrane. Conclusions: In conclusion, the minipig is not suitable for corneal transplantation studies in vivo because of intraoperative challenges and development of retrocorneal membrane postoperatively. For in vivo testing of the surgical handling and the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered endothelial cell-carrier constructs other animal models are required. Show less
