AimsSoil biotic communities can strongly impact plant performance. So far, most studies on plant-soil-interactions have estimated the effect of the soil microbial community on plant mass after a... Show moreAimsSoil biotic communities can strongly impact plant performance. So far, most studies on plant-soil-interactions have estimated the effect of the soil microbial community on plant mass after a fixed duration of plant growth. However, these interactions may change over time and several studies have argued that plant-soil interactions are more important for young seedlings than for older plants. In this paper we ask the question: how long-lasting the effect of the soil microbial community on plant growth is. This is important as the growth rate of a plant is not only determined by the growing conditions but also by the size of the plant itself. Therefore, plant with a reduced growth rate early in life, due to negative effects of the soil microbial community, may increase less in biomass for a much longer period even though the relative growth rates do not differ any longer.MethodsWe examined the plant growth rates at three stages: early growth (0-21 days), mid growth (22 to 42 days) and late growth (43 to 63 days). We performed two growth experiments with Jacobaea vulgaris lasting 49 and 63 days. Plants were grown in sterilized soil or in sterilized soil inoculated with natural dune soil. In a third experiment, we examined the effect of the timing of soil inoculation prior to planting on the (relative-) growth rate of J. vulgaris plants with four different timing treatments.Important findingsIn all experiments, differences in biomass of plants grown in sterilized soil and inoculated soil (live soil) increased throughout the experiment. Interestingly, linear regression models with ln transformed dry weight against time for younger plants and for older plants in sterilized soil and live soil, respectively, showed that the relative growth rate of plants in the sterilized soil was only significantly higher than that of plants in the live soil in the first two to three weeks. After that period there was no longer a negative effect of the live soil on the relative growth rate of plants. In the third experiment, plant biomass decreased with increasing time between inoculation and planting. Overall, our results show that plants of J. vulgaris grew less well in live soil than in sterilized soil. The negative effects of soil inoculation on plant mass appeared to extend over the whole growth period but arise from the negative effects on relative growth rates that occurred in the first weeks after planting when plants have only less than 5% of the mass they obtained after 42 days. Our study highlights the importance of examining relative growth rates rather than final biomass to estimate the effects of soil microbial communities on plants. Show less
Background and aims Jacobaea vulgaris plants grow better in sterilized than in live soil. Foliar application of SA mitigates this negative effect of live soil on plant growth. To examine what... Show moreBackground and aims Jacobaea vulgaris plants grow better in sterilized than in live soil. Foliar application of SA mitigates this negative effect of live soil on plant growth. To examine what causes the positive effect of SA application on plant growth in live soils, we analyzed the effects of SA application on the composition of active rhizosphere bacteria in the soil. Methods We studied the composition of the microbial community over four consecutive plant cycles (generations), using mRNA sequencing of the microbial communities in the rhizosphere of J. vulgaris. We initiated the experiment with an inoculum of live soil collected from the field, and at the start of each subsequent plant cycle, we inoculated a small part of the soil from the previous plant cycle into sterile bulk soil. Results Application of SA did not significantly increase or decrease the Shannon diversity at genus level within each generation, but several specific genera were enriched or depleted after foliar SA application. The composition of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere significantly differed between plant cycles (generations), but application of SA did not alter this pattern. In the first generation no genera were significantly affected by the SA treatment, but in the second, third and fourth generations, specific genera were significantly affected. 89 species out of the total 270 (32.4%) were present as the "core" microbiome in all treatments over four plant cycles. Conclusions Overall, our study shows that the composition of bacterial genera in the rhizosphere significantly differed between plant cycles, but that it was not strongly affected by foliar application of SA on J. vulgaris leaves. Further studies should examine how activation of the SA signaling pathway in the plant changes the functional genes of the rhizosphere bacterial community. Show less
