The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced melanomathat develop brain metastases (BM) remains unpredictable. In this study, we aimed to identifyprognostic factors... Show moreThe efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced melanomathat develop brain metastases (BM) remains unpredictable. In this study, we aimed to identifyprognostic factors in patients with melanoma BM who are treated with ICIs. Data from advancedmelanoma patients with BM treated with ICIs in any line between 2013 and 2020 were obtained fromthe Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Patients were included from the time of the treatment ofBM with ICIs. Survival tree analysis was performed with clinicopathological parameters as potentialclassifiers and overall survival (OS) as the response variable. In total, 1278 patients were included.Most patients were treated with ipilimumab–nivolumab combination therapy (45%). The survivaltree analysis resulted in 31 subgroups. The median OS ranged from 2.7 months to 35.7 months. Thestrongest clinical parameter associated with survival in advanced melanoma patients with BM wasthe serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. Patients with elevated LDH levels and symptomaticBM had the worst prognosis. The clinicopathological classifiers identified in this study can contributeto optimizing clinical studies and can aid doctors in giving an indication of the patients’ survivalbased on their baseline and disease characteristics. Show less
Toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab and nivolumab is likely associated with clinical efficacy. In this study, we aim to evaluate this association for pembrolizumab. To this... Show moreToxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab and nivolumab is likely associated with clinical efficacy. In this study, we aim to evaluate this association for pembrolizumab. To this end, data of 147 patients included in the Dutch cohort of the Pembrolizumab Expanded Access Program were collected. All data were collected prospectively. Patients with adverse events (AEs) at any time during therapy showed a higher chance of achieving disease control compared with patients without AEs (low-grade AEs vs. no AEs: odds ratio=12.8, P=0.0002, high-grade AEs vs. no AEs: odds ratio=38.5, P=0.0001) according to a multivariate logistic regression analysis. In addition, Cox regression analysis showed a lower risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.97) and disease progression (hazard ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.98) over time for patients with high-grade AEs at any time during therapy compared with patients without AEs during therapy. To correct for time dependency of occurrence of AEs, a pseudolandmark analysis at 6 months of therapy was performed. Although significance was lost (Wald test P>0.05), prolonged survival in 3 patients who stopped therapy within 6 months due to the occurrence of AEs was observed, suggesting the potential treatment benefit despite the premature ending of therapy. The occurrence of high-grade toxicity at any time during treatment was associated with higher objective response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival. There remains a need to assess the predictive value of early occurring AEs on patient survival. Show less
