The purpose of this study was to characterize the motion and define the required treatment margins of the pathological mesorectal lymph nodes (GTVln) for two online adaptive MRI-guided strategies... Show moreThe purpose of this study was to characterize the motion and define the required treatment margins of the pathological mesorectal lymph nodes (GTVln) for two online adaptive MRI-guided strategies for sequential boosting. Secondly, we determine the margins required for the primary gross tumor volume (GTVprim). Twenty-eight patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac were included in the study. On T2-weighted images for adaptation (MRIadapt) before and verification after irradiation (MRIpost) of five treatment fractions per patient, the GTVln and GTVprim were delineated. With online adaptive MRI-guided radiotherapy, daily plan adaptation can be performed through the use of two different strategies. In an adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow the interfraction motion is effectively corrected by redelineation and the only relevant motion is intrafraction motion, while in an adapt-to-position (ATP) workflow the margin (for GTVln) is dominated by interfraction motion. The margin required for GTVprim will be identical to the ATS workflow, assuming each fraction would be perfectly matched on GTVprim. The intrafraction motion was calculated between MRIadapt and MRIpost for the GTVln and GTVprim separately. The interfraction motion of the GTVln was calculated with respect to the position of GTVprim, assuming each fraction would be perfectly matched on GTVprim. PTV margins were calculated for each strategy using the Van Herk recipe. For GTVln we randomly sampled the original dataset 20 times, with each subset containing a single randomly selected lymph node for each patient. The resulting margins for ATS ranged between 3 and 4 mm (LR), 3 and 5 mm (CC) and 5 and 6 mm (AP) based on the 20 randomly sampled datasets for GTVln. For ATP, the margins for GTVln were 10–12 mm in LR and AP and 16–19 mm in CC. The margins for ATS for GTVprim were 1.7 mm (LR), 4.7 mm (CC) and 3.2 mm anterior and 5.6 mm posterior. Daily delineation using ATS of both target volumes results in the smallest margins and is therefore recommended for safe dose escalation to the primary tumor and lymph nodes. Show less
Kensen, C.M.; Janssen, T.M.; Betgen, A.; Wiersema, L.; Peters, F.P.; Remeijer, P.; ... ; Heide, U.A. van der 2022
Purpose: To determine PTV margins for intrafraction motion in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for rectal cancer and the potential benefit of performing a 2nd adaptation prior to irradiation... Show morePurpose: To determine PTV margins for intrafraction motion in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for rectal cancer and the potential benefit of performing a 2nd adaptation prior to irradiation. Methods: Thirty patients with rectal cancer received radiotherapy on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. On T2-weighted images for adaptation (MRIadapt), verification prior to (MRIver) and after irradiation (MRIpost) of 5 treatment fractions per patient, the primary tumor GTV (GTV(prim)) and mesorectum CTV (CTVmeso) were delineated. The structures on MRIadapt were expanded to corresponding PTVs. We determined the required expansion margins such that on average over 5 fractions, 98% of CTVmeso and 95% of GTV(prim) on MRIpost was covered in 90% of the patients. Furthermore, we studied the benefit of an additional adaptation, just prior to irradiation, by evaluating the coverage between the structures on MRIver and MRIpost. A threshold to assess the need for a secondary adaptation was determined by considering the overlap between MRIadapt and MRIver. Results: PTV margins for intrafraction motion without 2nd adaptation were 6.4 mm in the anterior direction and 4.0 mm in all other directions for CTVmeso and 5.0 mm isotropically for GTV(prim). A 2nd adaptation, applied for all fractions where the motion between MRIadapt and MRIver exceeded 1 mm (36% of the fractions) would result in a reduction of the PTVmeso margin to 3.2 mm/2.0 mm. For PTVprim a margin reduction to 3.5 mm is feasible when a 2nd adaptation is performed in fractions where the motion exceeded 4 mm (17% of the fractions). Conclusion: We studied the potential benefit of intrafraction motion monitoring and a 2nd adaptation to reduce PTV margins in online adaptive MRIgRT in rectal cancer. Performing 2nd adaptations immediately after online replanning when motion exceeded 1 mm and 4 mm for CTVmeso and GTV(prim) respectively, could result in a 30-50% margin reduction with limited reduction of dose to the bowel. Show less
Purpose: To accurately quantify esophageal tumor position variability and to optimize image guided correction strategies.Material and Methods: Esophageal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy... Show morePurpose: To accurately quantify esophageal tumor position variability and to optimize image guided correction strategies.Material and Methods: Esophageal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (41.4-50.4 Gy in 23-28 fractions combined with carboplatin plus paclitaxel) were included in a prospective cohort study (NCT02139488). Gold fiducial markers were inserted into the esophageal tumors during diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound. Four-dimensional (4D) planning computed tomography (CT) and daily 4D cone beam (CB) CT scans were acquired. Each CBCT was registered to the planning CT using different regions of interest (bone; 3D), and carina, diaphragm, clinical target volume (CTV), and fiducial markers (4D) for alignment and using the fiducial markers as the true tumor position. Subsequently, a planning target volume (PTV) margin accounting for residual uncertainties, including the average respiratory motion, was calculated for each of these registrations.Results: Fifty-six patients with tumors located in the proximal (n=1), mid (n=7), or distal esophagus (n=25) or at the gastroesophageal junction (n=23) were included. The average peak-to-peak respiratory tumor motion was 0.20, 0.92, and 0.34 cm on the planning CT in left-right (LR), cranial-caudal (CC), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively. The required PTV margin with average motion amplitude, depending on the correction strategy used for image guidance, ranged from 0.8 cm to 1.0 cm, 1.1 cm to 1.6 cm, and 0.7 cm to 0.9 cm in LR, CC, and AP direction, respectively. A registration based on the CTV resulted in the smallest PTV margins (0.8, 1.1, and 0.7 cm in LR, CC, and AP direction, respectively). For bone registration the calculated PTV margins were 1.0, 1.3, and 0.7 cm in LR, CC, and AP directions, respectively. The registration based on the diaphragm increased PTV margins.Conclusions: Substantial and anisotropic position variability of esophageal tumors was observed during radiation therapy, and nonuniform margins should be considered. Cranial-caudal PTV margins need to be larger than those commonly used. Target positioning during image-guided radiotherapy could be improved with a CTV registration-based correction strategy. (C) 2019 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Show less
