OBJECTIVE Secondary health conditions (SHCs) are long-term complications that frequently occur due to traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) and can negatively affect quality of life in this patient... Show moreOBJECTIVE Secondary health conditions (SHCs) are long-term complications that frequently occur due to traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) and can negatively affect quality of life in this patient population. This study provides an overview of the associations between the severity and level of injury and the occurrence of SHCs in tSCI. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Embase that retrieved 44 studies on the influence of severity and/or level of injury on the occurrence of SHCs in the subacute and chronic phase of tSCI (from 3 months after trauma). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. RESULTS In the majority of studies, patients with motor-complete tSCI (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale [AIS] grade A or B) had a significantly increased occurrence of SHCs in comparison to patients with motor-incomplete tSCI (AIS grade C or D), such as respiratory and urogenital complications, musculoskeletal disorders, pressure ulcers, and autonomic dysreflexia. In contrast, an increased prevalence of pain was seen in patients with motor-incomplete injuries. In addition, higher rates of pulmonary infections, spasticity, and autonomic dysreflexia were observed in patients with tetraplegia. Patients with paraplegia more commonly suffered from hypertension, venous thromboembolism, and pain. CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that patients with a motor-complete tSCI have an increased risk of developing SHCs during the subacute and chronic stage of tSCI in comparison with patients with motor-incomplete tSCI. Future studies should examine whether systematic monitoring during rehabilitation and the subacute and chronic phase in patients with motor-complete tSCI could lead to early detection and potential prevention of SHCs in this population. Show less
The Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) is dedicated to advancing the care of patients with cervical spine pathology. The authors present here highlights of the 2019 CSRS-Asia Pacific Traveling... Show moreThe Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) is dedicated to advancing the care of patients with cervical spine pathology. The authors present here highlights of the 2019 CSRS-Asia Pacific Traveling Fellowship. Show less
Study design Cross-sectional survey. Objectives Most studies on neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) assess treatment effects using the American Spinal Injury Association... Show moreStudy design Cross-sectional survey. Objectives Most studies on neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) assess treatment effects using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS grade) or motor points recovery. To what extent neurological recovery is considered clinically meaningful is unknown. This study investigated the perceived clinical benefit of various degrees of neurological recovery one year after C5 AIS-A tSCI. Setting The Netherlands. Methods By means of a web-based survey SCI patients and physicians evaluated the benefit of various scenarios of neurological recovery on a scale from 0 to 100% (0% no benefit to 100% major benefit). Recovery to AIS-C and D, was split into C/C+ and D/D+, which was defined by the lower and upper limit of recovery for each grade. Results A total of 79 patients and 77 physicians participated in the survey. Each AIS grade improvement from AIS-A was considered significant benefit (all p < 0.05), ranging from 47.8% (SD 26.1) for AIS-B to 86.8% (SD 24.3) for AIS-D+. Motor level lowering was also considered significant benefit (p < 0.05), ranging from 66.1% (SD 22.3) for C6 to 81.7% (SD 26.0) for C8. Conclusions Meaningful recovery can be achieved without improving in AIS grade, since the recovery of functional motor levels appears to be as important as improving in AIS grade by both patients and physicians. Moreover, minor neurological improvements within AIS-C and D are also considered clinically meaningful. Future studies should incorporate more detailed neurological outcomes to prevent potential underestimation of neurological recovery by only using the AIS grade. Show less
The impact of surgical timing in neurological recovery in thoracic and thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is still a subject of discussion. While in cervical tSCI one may expect a... Show moreThe impact of surgical timing in neurological recovery in thoracic and thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is still a subject of discussion. While in cervical tSCI one may expect a beneficial effect of early intervention within 24 h, especially in complete cases, this has not yet been demonstrated clearly for thoracic tSCI. This study addresses neurological improvement after early and late surgery for thoracic and thoracolumbar tSCI. A systematic search retrieved 14 publications of observational studies reporting outcome measurements after surgery in 1075 patients with thoracic and thoracolumbar tSCI from PubMed and Embase databases. Surgery was considered early within 24 h and late thereafter. An improvement of at least one and two grades on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA) was evaluated. The Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies guidelines were followed. Improvement rates were summarized using individual patient data in a Bayesian random effects model and compared for those with early and late surgery. In the qualitative analysis, six of seven studies, which investigated the effect of surgical timing, observed a significant effect of early surgery on at least one ASIA grade improvement. Quantitative analysis in 948 patients with thoracic and thoracolumbar tSCI data, however, did not reveal a significant increase in odds of >= 1 ASIA grade recovery in early surgery (66.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 45.0-87.8%] compared with late surgery (48.9% [95% CI: 25.1-70.7%; odds ratio (OR) 2.2 (95% CI: 0.6-14.0]). This study did not observe a significant beneficial effect of surgical decompression within 24 h in patients with thoracic and thoracolumbar tSCI. Show less
Study Design: A narrative literature review. Objectives: To review the neurological recovery patterns in traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) patients with a complete lack of motor and sensory... Show moreStudy Design: A narrative literature review. Objectives: To review the neurological recovery patterns in traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) patients with a complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury (ie, ASIA A [American Spinal Injury Association scale]), as well as the impact of level of injury and timing of surgical intervention. Results: Spontaneous neurological recovery in patients with complete tSCI differs per level of injury: patients with cervical and thoracolumbar tSCI recover >= 1 ASIA grade in 17.3% to 34.0% 1 year after injury, compared with 10.7% to 18.6% in thoracic tSCI. Surgical decompression within 24 hours has a beneficial effect on neurological recovery in patients with complete cervical tSCI, whereas this effect is less clear for thoracic and thoracolumbar tSCI. A 1- or 2-grade improvement in the ASIA scale does not necessarily result in functional recovery. Conclusion: In complete tSCI, the level of injury as well as surgical timing affect neurological recovery. There appears to be a beneficial effect of early surgical decompression in patients with complete cervical tSCI, more so than for thoracic and thoracolumbar tSCI. Frequently, the effect of surgical intervention is evaluated by an improvement in ASIA grade, but it is unclear whether this scale is sensitive enough to evaluate meaningful effectiveness of the intervention and desired outcome for patients with tSCI. Show less
