ObjectiveDistinguishing normal, neuropathic and myopathic electromyography (EMG) traces can be challenging. We aimed to create an automated time series classification algorithm.MethodsEMGs of... Show moreObjectiveDistinguishing normal, neuropathic and myopathic electromyography (EMG) traces can be challenging. We aimed to create an automated time series classification algorithm.MethodsEMGs of healthy controls (HC, n = 25), patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, n = 20) and inclusion body myositis (IBM, n = 20), were retrospectively selected based on longitudinal clinical follow-up data (ALS and HC) or muscle biopsy (IBM). A machine learning pipeline was applied based on 5-second EMG fragments of each muscle. Diagnostic yield expressed as area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver-operator characteristics curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were determined per muscle (muscle-level) and per patient (patient-level).ResultsDiagnostic yield of the classification ALS vs. HC was: AUC 0.834 ± 0.014 at muscle-level and 0.856 ± 0.009 at patient-level. For the classification HC vs. IBM, AUC was 0.744 ± 0.043 at muscle-level and 0.735 ± 0.029 at patient-level. For the classification ALS vs. IBM, AUC was 0.569 ± 0.024 at muscle-level and 0.689 ± 0.035 at patient-level.ConclusionsAn automated time series classification algorithm can distinguish EMGs from healthy individuals from those of patients with ALS with a high diagnostic yield. Using longer EMG fragments with different levels of muscle activation may improve performance. Show less
Objective: A downside of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's Disease (PD) is that cognitive function may deteriorate postoperatively. Electroencephalography (EEG) was explored as biomarker... Show moreObjective: A downside of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's Disease (PD) is that cognitive function may deteriorate postoperatively. Electroencephalography (EEG) was explored as biomarker of cognition using a Machine Learning (ML) pipeline.Methods: A fully automated ML pipeline was applied to 112 PD patients, taking EEG time-series as input and predicted class-labels as output. The most extreme cognitive scores were selected for class differentiation, i.e. best vs. worst cognitive performance (n = 20 per group). 16,674 features were extracted per patient; feature-selection was performed using a Boruta algorithm. A random forest classifier was modelled; 10-fold cross-validation with Bayesian optimization was performed to ensure generalizability. The predicted class-probabilities of the entire cohort were compared to actual cognitive performance.Results: Both groups were differentiated with a mean accuracy of 0.92; using only occipital peak frequency yielded an accuracy of 0.67. Class-probabilities and actual cognitive performance were negatively linearly correlated (b =-0.23 (95% confidence interval (-0.29,-0.18))).Conclusions: Particularly high accuracies were achieved using a compound of automatically extracted EEG biomarkers to classify PD patients according to cognition, rather than a single spectral EEG feature.Significance: Automated EEG assessment may have utility for cognitive profiling of PD patients during the DBS screening. (c) 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
