Background: A decade ago, it became possible to derive mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) at the bedside using the inspiratory hold maneuver. MSFP has the potential to help guide hemodynamic... Show moreBackground: A decade ago, it became possible to derive mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP) at the bedside using the inspiratory hold maneuver. MSFP has the potential to help guide hemodynamic care, but the estimation is not yet implemented in common clinical practice. In this study, we assessed the ability of MSFP, vascular compliance (Csys), and stressed volume (Vs) to track fluid boluses. Second, we assessed the feasibility of implementation of MSFP in the intensive care unit (ICU). Exploratory, a potential difference in MSFP response between colloids and crystalloids was assessed. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study in adult patients admitted to the ICU after cardiac surgery. The MSFP was determined using 3–4 inspiratory holds with incremental pressures (maximum 35 cm H2O) to construct a venous return curve. Two fluid boluses were administered: 100 and 500 ml, enabling to calculate Vs and Csys. Patients were randomized to crystalloid or colloid fluid administration. Trained ICU consultants acted as study supervisors, and protocol deviations were recorded. Results: A total of 20 patients completed the trial. MSFP was able to track the 500 ml bolus (p < 0.001). In 16 patients (80%), Vs and Csys could be determined. Vs had a median of 2029 ml (IQR 1605–3164), and Csys had a median of 73 ml mmHg−1 (IQR 56–133). A difference in response between crystalloids and colloids was present for the 100 ml fluid bolus (p = 0.019) and in a post hoc analysis, also for the 500 ml bolus (p = 0.010). Conclusion: MSFP can be measured at the bedside and provides insights into the hemodynamic status of a patient that are currently missing. The clinical feasibility of Vs and Csys was judged ambiguously based on the lack of required hemodynamic stability. Future studies should address the clinical obstacles found in this study Show less
Background: Aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence and incidence of catheter-related infection, identify risk factors, and determine the relation of catheter-related infection with... Show moreBackground: Aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence and incidence of catheter-related infection, identify risk factors, and determine the relation of catheter-related infection with mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of central venous catheters (CVCs) in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Eligible CVC insertions required an indwelling time of at least 48 hours and were identified using a full-admission electronic health record database. Risk factors were identified using logistic regression. Differences in survival rates at day 28 of follow-up were assessed using a log-rank test and proportional hazard model. Results: In 538 patients, a total of 914 CVCs were included. Prevalence and incidence of suspected catheter-related infection were 7.9% and 9.4 infections per 1,000 catheter indwelling days, respectively. Prone ventilation for more than 5 days was associated with increased risk of suspected catheter-related infection; odds ratio, 5.05 (95% confidence interval 2.12-11.0). Risk of death was significantly higher in patients with suspected catheter-related infection (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.53). Conclusions: This study shows that in critically ill patients with COVID-19, prevalence and incidence of suspected catheter-related infection are high, prone ventilation is a risk factor, and mortality is higher in case of catheter-related infection. Show less
It is important to gain more insight into the cardiogenic shock (CS) population, as currently, little is known on how to improve outcomes. Therefore, we assessed clinical outcome in acute coronary... Show moreIt is important to gain more insight into the cardiogenic shock (CS) population, as currently, little is known on how to improve outcomes. Therefore, we assessed clinical outcome in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with and without CS at admission. Furthermore, the incidence of CS and predictors for mortality in CS patients were evaluated. The Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR) is a nationwide registry on all cardiac interventions. We used NHR data of ACS patients treated with PCI between 2015 and 2019. Among 75,407 ACS patients treated with PCI, 3028 patients (4.1%) were identified with CS, respectively 4.3%, 3.9%, 3.5%, and 4.3% per year. Factors associated with mortality in CS were age (HR 1.02, 95%CI 1.02-1.03), eGFR (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.98-0.99), diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.08-1.45), multivessel disease (HR 1.22, 95%CI 1.06-1.39), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.06-1.45), and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.50-1.94). In conclusion, in this Dutch nationwide registry-based study of ACS patients treated by PCI, the incidence of CS was 4.1% over the 4-year study period. Predictors for mortality in CS were higher age, renal insufficiency, presence of DM, multivessel disease, prior MI, and OHCA. Show less
Potentially, mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) could aid hemodynamic management in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, data regarding the normal range for Pmcf do... Show morePotentially, mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) could aid hemodynamic management in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, data regarding the normal range for Pmcf do not exist challenging its clinical use. We aimed to define the range for Pmcf for ICU patients and also calculated in what percentage of cases equilibrium between arterial blood pressure (ABP) and central venous pressure (CVP) was reached. In patients in whom no equilibrium was reached, we corrected for arterial-to-venous compliance differences. Finally, we studied the influence of patient characteristics on Pmcf. We hypothesized fluid balance, the use of vasoactive medication, being on mechanical ventilation, and the level of positive endexpiratory pressure would be positively associated with Pmcf. We retrospectively studied a cohort of 311 patients that had cardiac arrest in ICU while having active recording of ABP and CVP 1 min after death. Median Pmcf was 15 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) 12-18]. ABP and CVP reached an equilibrium state in 52% of the cases. Correction for arterial-to-venous compliances differences resulted in a maximum alteration of 1.3 mmHg in Pmcf. Fluid balance over the last 24 h, the use of vasoactive medication, and being on mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher Pmcf. Median Pmcf was 15 mmHg (IQR 12-18). When ABP remained higher than CVP, correction for arterial-to-venous compliance differences did not result in a clinically relevant alteration of Pmcf. Pmcf was affected by factors known to alter vasomotor tone and effective circulating blood volume.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In a cohort of 311 intensive care unit (ICU) patients, median mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) measured after cardiac arrest was 15 mmHg (interquartile range 12-18). In 48% of cases, arterial blood pressure remained higher than central venous pressure. but correction for arterial-to-venous compliance differences did not result in clinically relevant alterations of Pmcf. Fluid balance, use of vasopressors or inotropes, and being on mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher Pmcf. Show less
BACKGROUND: S-ketamine is frequently used for analgosedation, especially during sepsis and cardiovascular instability. Because S-ketamine blocks voltage-gated sodium (Na+) channels in neurons and... Show moreBACKGROUND: S-ketamine is frequently used for analgosedation, especially during sepsis and cardiovascular instability. Because S-ketamine blocks voltage-gated sodium (Na+) channels in neurons and skeletal muscle, it is conceivable that S-ketamine also blocks alveolar epithelial Na+ channels that are crucial for alveolar fluid clearance (AFC). We studied the effects of alveolar and IV S-ketamine on transalveolar Na+ transport and AFC, and investigated whether IV S-ketamine enters the alveolar space in response to endotoxemia-induced pulmonary inflammation. METHODS: Cultured rat alveolar type II (ATII) cells were exposed to S-ketamine and/or the Na+ channel blocker amiloride (100 mu M) and transepithelial transport indicated by short circuit current (ISC) was measured in Ussing chambers. AFC was measured in fluid-instilled lungs of anesthetized rats with or without amiloride added to the instillate. S-ketamine was either added to the instillate or injected IV. To induce mild lung injury that might favor the appearance of IV S-ketamine at the alveolar surface, endotoxemia was induced by IV lipopolysaccharide (7.5 mg/kg). RESULTS: In ATII cells, S-ketamine (25 mu g/mL) caused a decrease of ISC regardless of apical (-18.9%+/- 1.4%; P < 0.001) or basolateral (-20.4%+/- 3.7%; P < 0.001) application. In ATII cells pretreated with amiloride, addition of apical or basolateral S-ketamine did not decrease ISC. AFC was approximately 8% per 30 minutes in control rats. S-ketamine (5 mu g/mL) in the instillate reduced AFC to 1.1%+/- 1.5% (P = 0.04) by decreasing amiloride-sensitive transepithelial Na+ transport. Intravenous S-ketamine (20 mg/kg) did not affect AFC (P = 0.31). In the presence of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation, the concentration of IV-injected S-ketamine in bron-choalveolar lavage fluid remained below the concentration that inhibited AFC. CONCLUSIONS: Although exposure of the rat alveolar epithelium to S-ketamine decreases amiloride-sensitive transalveolar Na+ transport and AFC, IV S-ketamine at clinically relevant bolus concentrations does not affect AFC, even in the presence of mild lung injury. (Anesth Analg 2010;111:164-70) Show less
