Background: Patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a high risk of VTE recurrence and anticoagulant treatment-related bleeding, but the correlation of these risks with the... Show moreBackground: Patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a high risk of VTE recurrence and anticoagulant treatment-related bleeding, but the correlation of these risks with the cancer stage is unclear.Methods: We evaluated the risks of VTE recurrence and treatment-related major bleeding according to the cancer stage in patients with VTE and solid cancer randomised to apixaban or dalteparin in the Caravaggio study. Cancer stage was categorised by expert cancer physicians according to pre-specified criteria, and study outcomes were adjudicated by an independent committee unaware of cancer stage and treatment allocation.Results: Of the 1034 patients included in this analysis, 217 (21.0%) had localised cancer, 279 (27.0%) locally advanced cancer and 503 (48.7%) metastatic cancer. Cancer stage was undetermined in 35 patients (3.4%). VTE recurrence and major bleeding rates were 2.8% and 3.2% in patients with localised cancer, respectively. In comparison to patients with localised cancer, the VTE recurrence rate was higher in patients with locally advanced cancer (7.5%, hazard ra-tio [HR] = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-6.9) and metastatic cancer (8.7%, HR = 3.3, CI = 1.4-7.7, CI). Patients with metastatic cancer had numerically increased major bleedings compared to those with localised cancer (5.2%, HR = 1.65, CI = 0.7-3.8). The ef-ficacy and safety of apixaban and dalteparin across patients with different cancer stages were consistent with the findings observed in the overall patients with cancer randomised in the study.Conclusions: Patients with locally advanced and metastatic cancer have a higher rate of VTE recurrence than patients with localised cancer with no statistically significant difference in treatment-related major bleeding. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Show less
Verso, M.; Munoz, A.; Bauersachs, R.; Huisman, M.V.; Mandala, M.; Vescovo, G.; ... ; Agnelli, G. 2021
Background: Whether concomitant administration of anticancer agents influences the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients treated for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE)... Show moreBackground: Whether concomitant administration of anticancer agents influences the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients treated for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is undefined. The pharmacological interaction between anticancer agents and direct oral anticoagulants is perceived as a concern.Methods: We evaluated the effects of concomitant administration of anticancer agents on recurrent VTE, major bleeding and death in patients with cancer-associated VTE randomised to receive apixaban or dalteparin in the Caravaggio study.Results: Anticancer agents were concomitantly given to 336 patients (58.3%) treated with apixaban and to 332 patients (57.3%) treated with dalteparin. In patients treated with apixaban, recurrent VTE occurred in 20 (6.0%) and 12 (5.0%) among patients treated or not treated with anticancer agents, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14; 0.55-2.38); major bleeding occurred in 12 (3.6%) and 10 (4.2%) patients , respectively (HR = 0.79; 0.34-1.82), and death occurred in 74 (22.0%) and 61 (25.4%) patients , respectively (HR = 0.71; 0.51-1. 00). In patients treated with dalteparin, recurrent VTE occurred in 24 (7.2%) and 22 (8.9%) among patients treated or not treated with anticancer agents, respectively (HR = 0.71; 0.40-1.28); major bleeding occurred in 16 (4.8%) and 7 (2.8%) patients, respectively (HR = 1.78; 0.66-4.79 ), and death occurred in 87 (26.2% ) and 66 (26.7 %) patients, respectively (HR = 0.85; 0.62-1.18). The comparative efficacy and safety of apixaban and dalteparin was not different in patients treated or not treated with anticancer agents. No effect on recurrent VTE, major bleeding or death was observed with inhibitors or inducers of P-glycoprotein and/or CYP3A4.Conclusion: In our study, concomitant administration of anticancer agents had no effect on the risk of VTE recurrence or major bleeding in patients treated with apixaban or dalteparin for cancer-associated VTE.(c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Background Recent guidelines recommend consideration of the use of oral edoxaban or rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. However, the benefit of these... Show moreBackground Recent guidelines recommend consideration of the use of oral edoxaban or rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. However, the benefit of these oral agents is limited by the increased risk of bleeding associated with their use.Methods This was a multinational, randomized, investigator-initiated, open-label, noninferiority trial with blinded central outcome adjudication. We randomly assigned consecutive patients with cancer who had symptomatic or incidental acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism to receive oral apixaban (at a dose of 10 mg twice daily for the first 7 days, followed by 5 mg twice daily) or subcutaneous dalteparin (at a dose of 200 IU per kilogram of body weight once daily for the first month, followed by 150 IU per kilogram once daily). The treatments were administered for 6 months. The primary outcome was objectively confirmed recurrent venous thromboembolism during the trial period. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding.Results Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 32 of 576 patients (5.6%) in the apixaban group and in 46 of 579 patients (7.9%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Major bleeding occurred in 22 patients (3.8%) in the apixaban group and in 23 patients (4.0%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.69; P=0.60).Conclusions Oral apixaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism without an increased risk of major bleeding. (Funded by the Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance; Caravaggio ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03045406.) Show less
Agnelli, G.; Becattini, C.; Bauersachs, R.; Brenner, B.; Campanini, M.; Cohen, A.; ... ; Caravaggio Study Investigators 2018
Background: Knowledge of independent, baseline risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) may help select adult cancer patients who are at high risk to receive thromboprophylaxis.... Show moreBackground: Knowledge of independent, baseline risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) may help select adult cancer patients who are at high risk to receive thromboprophylaxis. Objectives: We conducted a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data to identify these baseline risk factors. Patients/Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, DARE and the Grey literature databases were searched in all languages from 1995 to 2008. Prospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible. Studies were included if original patient-level data were provided by the investigators and if CRT was objectively confirmed with valid imaging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 17 prespecified baseline characteristics was conducted. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Results: A total sample of 5636 subjects from five RCTs and seven prospective studies was included in the analysis. Among these subjects, 425 CRT events were observed. In multivariate logistic regression, the use of implanted ports as compared with peripherally implanted central venous catheters (PICCs), decreased CRT risk (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80), whereas past history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.05-3.92), subclavian venipuncture insertion technique (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.07-4.34) and improper catheter tip location (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.22-3.02), increased CRT risk. Conclusions: CRT risk is increased with use of PICCs, previous history of DVT, subclavian venipuncture insertion technique and improper positioning of the catheter tip. These factors may be useful for risk stratifying patients to select those for thromboprophylaxis. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings. Show less
