PURPOSE Despite its high prognostic value, widespread clinical implementation of (123)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy is hampered by a lack of validation and... Show morePURPOSE Despite its high prognostic value, widespread clinical implementation of (123)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy is hampered by a lack of validation and standardization. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of planar (123)I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS Planar myocardial MIBG images of 70 HF patients were analysed by two experienced and one inexperienced observer. The reproducibility of early and delayed heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratios, as well as washout rate (WR) calculated by two different methods, was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman analysis. In addition, a subanalysis in patients with a very low H/M ratio (delayed H/M ratio <1.4) was performed. The delayed H/M ratio was also assessed using fixed-size oval and circular cardiac regions of interest (ROI). RESULTS Intra- and interobserver analyses and experienced versus inexperienced observer analysis showed excellent agreement for the measured early and delayed H/M ratios and WR on planar (123)I-MIBG images (the ICCs for the delayed H/M ratios were 0.98, 0.96 and 0.90, respectively). In addition, the WR without background correction resulted in higher reliability than the WR with background correction (the interobserver Bland-Altman 95 % limits of agreement were -2.50 to 2.16 and -10.10 to 10.14, respectively). Furthermore, the delayed H/M ratio measurements remained reliable in a subgroup of patients with a very low delayed H/M ratio (ICC 0.93 for the inter-observer analysis). Moreover, a fixed-size cardiac ROI could be used for the assessment of delayed H/M ratios, with good reliability of the measurement. CONCLUSION The present study showed a high reliability of planar (123)I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy in HF patients, confirming that MIBG myocardial scintigraphy can be implemented easily for clinical risk stratification in HF. Show less
Veltman, C.E.; Boogers, M.J.; Meinardi, J.E.; Younis, I. al; Dibbets-Schneider, P.; Wall, E.E. van der; ... ; Scholte, A.J.H.A. 2012
AimsLimited information is available regarding the relationship between coronary vessel dominance and prognosis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of... Show moreAimsLimited information is available regarding the relationship between coronary vessel dominance and prognosis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of coronary vessel dominance in relation to significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred for computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA).Methods and resultsThe study population consisted of 1425 patients (869 men, 57 ± 12 years) referred for CTA. To evaluate the impact of vessel dominance and significant CAD on CTA on outcome, patients were followed during a median period of 24 months for the occurrence of non-fatal myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. The presence of a left dominant system was identified as a significant predictor for non-fatal myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality (HR: 3.20; 95% CI: 1.67-6.13, P < 0.001) and had incremental value over baseline risk factors and severity of CAD on CTA. In addition, in the subgroup of patients with significant CAD on CTA, patients with a left dominant system had a worse outcome compared with patients with a right dominant system (cumulative event rates: 9.5% and 35% at 3-year follow-up for a right and left dominant coronary artery system, respectively, log-rank P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe presence of a left dominant system was identified as an independent predictor of non-fatal myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality, especially in patients with significant CAD on CTA. Therefore, the assessment of coronary vessel dominance on CTA may further enhance risk stratification beyond the assessment of significant CAD on CTA. Show less