BACKGROUND: The optimal degree of conformity between the glenoid and humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty for best performance and durability is still a matter of debate. The main aim... Show moreBACKGROUND: The optimal degree of conformity between the glenoid and humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty for best performance and durability is still a matter of debate. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of joint conformity on the bone-implant interface micromotions in a cementless glenoid implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polyethylene inlays with different degrees of conformity (radial mismatch of 0, 2, 4, and 6 mm) were mounted on a cementless metal back and then implanted in a bone substitute. These glenoid components were loaded by a prosthetic humeral head during a force-controlled experiment. Normal-to-interface micromotions and bone substitute deformations were measured at different points of the interface. Rim displacement and humeral head translation were also measured. A finite element (FE) model of the experiments was implemented to estimate the normal- and tangent-to-interface micromotions in the entire bone-implant interface. RESULTS: All measured variables increased with less-conforming PE inlays. Normal-to-interface micromotions were significantly larger (P < .05) when the radial mismatch was 6 mm compared with the fully conforming inlay. The FE model was in agreement and complemented the experimental results. FE model-predicted interface micromotions were already significantly larger when the radial mismatch was equal to 4 mm. DISCUSSION: In a force-controlled experiment with a cementless glenoid component, a non-conforming PE inlay allows larger interface micromotions than a conforming inlay, reaching a magnitude that may hamper local bone ingrowth in this type of component. This is mainly because of the larger humeral head translation that boosts the effects of the so-called rocking-horse phenomenon. Show less
Lugt, J.C.T. van der; Suarez, D.R.; Steenhoven, T.J. van der; Nelissen, R.G.H.H. 2010
The use of Souter-Strathclyde total elbow prostheses is a well-studied replacement therapy for reconstruction of the elbow, but loosening of the humeral component is still of concern at long-term... Show moreThe use of Souter-Strathclyde total elbow prostheses is a well-studied replacement therapy for reconstruction of the elbow, but loosening of the humeral component is still of concern at long-term follow-up. In this study we looked at the effect of humeral component size and bone mineral density with respect to the bone size, torsional stiffness and torque to failure in cadaveric bones. Fourteen cadaveric humeri were available for testing purposes and four different humeral component size categories were used. First, we calculated the bone quality using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The torsional stiffness of the prosthetic humeri was measured during two mechanical tests: Firstly, the applied torque was recorded during a torsion fatigue test. The change of torsional stiffness between the tenth and last cycle was calculated. Secondly, a simple torsion test was performed and the torque to failure was recorded. No significant differences in outcome were seen between sizes of humeral components, even after correction for the bone size. Torsional stiffness and torque to failure were significantly correlated with bone mineral density and not with component size. In conclusion, bone quality seems to be a major eminent factor in the fixation of the humeral component in elbow replacement surgery. Show less
Bosman, W.M.P.F.; Steenhoven, T.J. van der; Suarez, D.R.; Valstar, E.R.; Vries, A.C. de; Brom, H.L.F.; ... ; Hamming, J.F. 2010
Purpose: One of the major concerns in the long-term success of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is stent graft migration, which can cause type I endoleak and even aneurysm rupture. Fixation... Show morePurpose: One of the major concerns in the long-term success of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is stent graft migration, which can cause type I endoleak and even aneurysm rupture. Fixation depends on the mechanical forces between the graft and both the aortic neck and the blood flow. Therefore, there are anatomical restrictions for EVAR, such as short and angulated necks. To improve the fixation of EVAR grafts, elastomer (PDMS) can be injected in the aneurysm sac. The support given by the elastomer might prevent dislocation and migration of the graft. The aim of this study was to measure the influence of an injectable biocompatible elastomer on the fixation strength of different EVAR grafts in an in vitro model. Methods: The proximal part of three different stent grafts was inserted in a bovine artery with an attached latex aneurysm. The graft was connected to a tensile testing machine, applying force to the proximal fixation, while the artery with the aneurysm was fixated to the setup. The force to obtain graft dislodgement (DF) from the aorta was recorded in Newtons (N). Three different proximal seal lengths (5, 10, and 15 mm) were evaluated. The experiments were repeated after the space between the graft and the latex aneurysm was filled with the elastomer. Independent sample nests were used for the comparison between the DF before and after elastomer treatment for each seal length. Results: The mean DF (mean +/- SD) of all grafts without elastomer sac filling for a proximal seal length of 5, 10, and 15 mm were respectively, 4.4 +/- 3.1 N, 12.2 +/- 10.6 N, and 15.1 +/- 6.9 N. After elastomer sac filling, the dislodgement forces increased significantly (P < .001) to 20.9 +/- 3.8 N, 31.8 +/- 9.8 N, and 36.0 +/- 14.1 N, respectively. Conclusions: The present study shows that aneurysm sac filling may have a role as an adjuvant procedure to the present EVAR technique. The strength of the proximal fixation of three different stent grafts increases significantly in this in vitro setting. Further in vivo research must be done to see if this could facilitate the treatment of aneurysms with short infrarenal necks. (J Vase Surg 2010;52:152-8.) Show less
Bosman, W.M.P.F.; Steenhoven, T.J. van der; Suarez, D.R.; Hinnen, J.W.; Valstar, E.R.; Hamming, J.F. 2010
Objectives: The study aims to measure the strength of the proximal fixation of endografts in short and long necks. Design: Three types of endografts were compared: Gore Excluder (R), Vascutek... Show moreObjectives: The study aims to measure the strength of the proximal fixation of endografts in short and long necks. Design: Three types of endografts were compared: Gore Excluder (R), Vascutek Anaconda (R) and Medtronic Endurant (R). Materials and methods: The proximal part of the stent grafts was inserted in bovine arteries and the graft was then attached to a tensile testing machine. The force to obtain dislodgement (DF) from the aorta was recorded for each graft at proximal seal lengths of 10 and 15 mm. Results: The median OF (interquartile range, IQR) for the Excluder, the Anaconda and the Endurant with a seal length of 15 mm was: 11.8 (10.5-12.0) N, 20.8 (18.0-30.1) N and 10.7 (10.4-11.3) N. With the shorter proximal seal of 10 mm, DF was, respectively: 6.0 (4.5-6.6) N, 17.0 (11.2-36.6) N and 6.4 (6.1-12.0) N. Conclusions: The proximal fixation of the Anaconda is superior to the Excluder and the Endurant at short necks of 10 and 15 mm in an experimental set-up. There is a statistically significant decrease of proximal fixation for the Excluder stent graft, when decreasing the length of the proximal neck from 15 to 10 mm. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
