BACKGROUND Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) who are undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are at risk of rapidly progressive heart failure (HF). Endocardial... Show moreBACKGROUND Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) who are undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are at risk of rapidly progressive heart failure (HF). Endocardial voltages decrease with loss of viable myocardium. Global left ventricular (LV) voltage as a surrogate for the amount of remaining viable myocardium may predict prognosis.OBJECTIVES This study evaluated whether the newly proposed parameter volume-weighted (vw) unipolar voltage (UV) can predict HF-related adverse outcomes (HFOs), including death, heart transplantation, or ventricular assist device implantation, in DCM. METHODS In consecutive patients with DCM referred for VA ablation, vwUV was calculated by mathematically integrating UV over the left ventricle, divided by the endocardial LV surface area and wall thickness. Patients were followed for HFOs.RESULTS A total of 103 patients (57 +/- 14 years of age; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 39% +/- 13%) were included. Median vwUV was 9.75 (IQR: 7.27-12.29). During a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR: 8-47 months), 25 patients (24%) died, and 16 had HFOs 7 months (IQR: 1-18 months) after ablation. Patients with HFOs had significantly lower LVEF (29% +/- 10% vs 41% +/- 12%), vw bipolar voltage (BV) (3.00 [IQR: 2.47-3.53] vs 5.00 [IQR: 4.12-5.73]), and vwUV (5.94 [IQR: 5.28-6.55] vs 10.37 [IQR: 8.82-12.81]; all P < 0.001), than patients without HFOs. In Cox regression analysis and goodness-of-fit tests, vwUV was the strongest and independent predictor for HFOs (HR: 3.68; CI: 2.09-6.45; likelihood ratio chi-square, 33.05; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS The novel parameter vwUV, as a surrogate for the amount of viable myocardium, identifies patients with DCM with VA who are at high risk for HF progression and mortality. Show less
BACKGROUND: Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is difficult to treat, and long-term outcome data are limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to... Show moreBACKGROUND: Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is difficult to treat, and long-term outcome data are limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of mortality or heart transplantation (HTx) and VT recurrence. METHODS: Consecutive patients with DCM accepted for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of VT at 9 centers were prospectively enrolled and followed. RESULTS: Of 281 consecutive patients (mean age 60 +/- 13 years, 85% men, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 36% +/- 12%), 35% had VT storm, 20% had incessant VT, and amiodarone was unsuccessful in 68%. During follow-up of 21 months (IQR: 6-30 months), 67 patients (24%) died or underwent HTx, and 138 (49%) had VT recurrence (45 within 30 days, defined as early); the 4-year rate of VT recurrence or mortality or HTx was 70%. Independent predictors of mortality or HTx were early VT recurrence (HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.37-6.21; P < 0.01), amiodarone at discharge (HR: 3.23; 95% CI: 1.43-7.33; P < 0.01), renal dysfunction (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.01-3.64; P = 0.046), and LVEF (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.0-1.84; P = 0.052). LVEF <= 32% identified patients at risk for mortality or HTx (area under the curve: 0.75). Mortality or HTx per 100 person-years was 40.4 events after early, compared with 14.2 events after later VT recurrence and 8.5 events with no VT recurrence after RFCA (P < 0.01 for both). Patients with early recurrence and LVEFs <= 32% had a 1 -year rate of mortality or HTx of 55%. VT recurrence was predicted by prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, basal anteroseptal VT origin, and procedural failure but not LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DCM needing RFCA for VT are a high-risk group. Following RFCA, approximately one-half remain free of VT recurrence. Early VT recurrence with LVEF <= 32% identifies those at very high risk for mortality or HTx, and screening for mechanical support or HTx should be considered. Late VT recurrence after RFCA does not predict worse outcome. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;80:1045 & ndash;1056) (c) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Show less
OBJECTIVES The authors investigated the incremental prognostic value of entropy, a novel measure of myocardial tissue heterogeneity by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients... Show moreOBJECTIVES The authors investigated the incremental prognostic value of entropy, a novel measure of myocardial tissue heterogeneity by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients presenting with ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). BACKGROUND CMR can characterize myocardial areas serving as arrhythmogenic substrate. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing CMR imaging for VAs were followed for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined by all-cause death, incident VAs requiring therapy, or heart failure hospitalization. Entropy was derived from the probability distribution of pixel signal intensities of the left ventricular (LV) myocardium. RESULTS A total of 583 patients (age 54 +/- 15 years, female 39%, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 54 +/- 13%) were followed for a median of 4.4 years and experienced 141 MACEs. Entropy showed strong unadjusted association with MACE (HR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.63-2.17; P < 0.001). In a multivariable model including LVEF, QRS duration, late gadolinium enhancement, and presenting arrhythmia, entropy maintained independent association with MACE (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.32-1.96; P < 0.001). Entropy was further significantly associated with MACE in patients without myocardial scar (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.55-3.82; P < 0.001) and in those presenting with nonsustained VAs (HR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.43-3.25; P < 0.001). Addition of LV entropy to the baseline multivariable model significantly improved model performance (C-statistic improvement: 0.725 to 0.754; P 1/4 0.003) and risk reclassification. CONCLUSIONS In patients with VAs, CMR-assessed LV entropy was independently associated with MACE and provided incremental prognostic value, on top of LVEF and late gadolinium enhancement. LV entropy assessment may help risk stratification in patients with absence of myocardial scar or with nonsustained VAs.(C) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Show less
Hoogendoorn, J.C.; Venlet, J.; Out, Y.N.J.; Man, S.; Kumar, S.; Sramko, M.; ... ; Zeppenfeld, K. 2021
BACKGROUND Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with right ventricular (RV) involvement can mimic arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Histopathological differences may result in disease... Show moreBACKGROUND Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with right ventricular (RV) involvement can mimic arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Histopathological differences may result in disease-specific RV activation patterns detectable on the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Dominant subepicardial scar in ARVC leads to delayed activation of areas with reduced voltages, translating into terminal activation delay and occasionally (epsilon) waves with a small amplitude. Conversely, patchy transmural RV scar in CS may lead to conduction block and therefore late activated areas with preserved voltages reflected as preserved R' waves.OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distinct terminal activation patterns in precordial leads V-1 through V-3 as a discriminator between CS and ARVC.METHODS Thirteen patients with CS affecting the RV and 23 patients with gene-positive ARVC referred for ventricular tachycardia ablation were retrospectively included in a multicenter approach. A non-ventricular-paced 12-lead surface electrocardiogram was analyzed for the presence and the surface area of the R' wave (any positive deflection from baseline after an S wave) in leads V-1 through V-3.RESULTS An R' wave in leads V-1 through V-3 was present in all patients with CS compared to 11 (48%) patients with ARVC (P=.002). An algorithm including a PR interval of >= 220 ms, the presence of an R' wave, and the surface area of the maximum R' wave in leads V-1 through V-3 of similar to 1.65 mm(2) had 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity for diagnosing CS, validated in a second cohort (18 CS and 40 ARVC) with 83% sensitivity and 88% specificity.CONCLUSION An easily applicable algorithm including PR prolongation and the surface area of the maximum R' wave in leads V-1 through V-3 of similar to 1.65 mm(2) distinguishes CS from ARVC. This QRS terminal activation in precordial leads V-1 through V-3 may reflect disease-specific scar patterns. Show less
Siontis, K.C.; Kim, H.M.; Vergara, P.; Peretto, G.; D.H. do; Riva, M. de; ... ; Bogun, F.M. 2020
Aims Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for post-infarction ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, some patients may experience a worsened arrhythmia phenotype after ablation. We aimed to... Show moreAims Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for post-infarction ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, some patients may experience a worsened arrhythmia phenotype after ablation. We aimed to determine the prevalence and prognostic impact of arrhythmia exacerbation (AE) after post-infarction VT ablation.Methods and results A total of 1187 consecutive patients (93% men, median age 68 years, median ejection fraction 30%) who underwent post-infarction VT ablation at six centres were included. Arrhythmia exacerbation was defined as post ablation VT storm or incessant VT in patients without prior similar events. During follow-up (median 717 days), 426 (36%) patients experienced VT recurrence. Events qualifying as AE occurred in 67 patients (6%). Median times to VT recurrence with and without AE were 238 [interquartile range (IQR) 35-640] days and 135 (IQR 22-521) days, respectively (P= 0.25). Almost half of the patients (46%) who experienced AE experienced it within 6 months of the index procedure. Patients with AE had had longer ablation times during the ablation procedures compared to the rest of the patients (median 42 vs. 34 min, P = 0.02). Among patients with VT recurrence, the risk of death or heart transplantation was significantly higher in patients with than without AE (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.28-3.10; P= 0.002) after adjusting for age, gender, ejection fraction, cardiac resynchronization therapy, post-ablation non-inducibility, and post-ablation amiodarone use.Conclusion Arrhythmia exacerbation after ablation of infarct-related VT is infrequent but is independently associated with an adverse long-term outcome among patients who experience a VT recurrence. The mechanisms and mitigation strategies of AE after catheter ablation require further investigation. Show less
Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and... Show moreVentricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Show less
Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and... Show moreVentricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Show less
Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and... Show moreVentricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Show less
Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and... Show moreVentricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Show less
Hoogendoorn, J.C.; Sramko, M.; Venlet, J.; Siontis, K.C.; Kumar, S.; Singh, R.; ... ; Zeppenfeld, K. 2020
OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the value of electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) to distinguish cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) from arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)... Show moreOBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the value of electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) to distinguish cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) from arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in patients with ventriculartachycardia from the right ventricle (RV).BACKGROUND CS can mimic ARVC. Because scar in ARVC is predominantly subepicardial, this study hypothesized that the relative sizes of endocardial low bipolar voltage (BV) to low unipolar voltage (UV) areas may distinguish CS from ARVC.METHODS Patients with CS affecting the RV (n = 14), patients with gene-positive ARVC (n = 13), and a reference group of patients without structural heart disease (n = 9) who underwent RV endocardial EAVM were included. RV regionspecific BV and UV cutoffs were derived from control subjects. In CS and ARVC, segmental involvement was determined and low-voltage areas were measured, using <1.5 mV for BV and <3.9 mV, <4.4 mV, and <5.5 mV for UV. The ratio between low BV and low UV area was calculated generating 3 parameters: Ratio3.9, Ratio4.4 and Ratio5.5, respectively.RESULTS In control subjects, BV and UV varied significantly among RV regions. The basal septum was involved in 71% of CS patients and in none of ARVC patients. Ratio5.5 discriminated CS from ARVC the best. An algorithm including Ratio5.5≥0.45 and basal septal involvement identified CS with 93% sensitivity and 85% specificity. This was validated in a separate population (CS [n = 6], ARVC [n = 10]) with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity.CONCLUSIONS EAVM provides detailed information about scar characteristics and scar distribution in the RV. An algorithm combining Ratio5.5 (area BV <1.5 mV/area UV <5.5 mV) and bipolar basal septal involvement allows accurate diagnosis of (isolated) CS in patients presenting with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia from the RV. Show less
Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and... Show moreVentricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Show less
Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and... Show moreVentricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Show less
BACKGROUND The comparative efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy vs ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is unknown.OBJECTIVE We... Show moreBACKGROUND The comparative efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy vs ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is unknown.OBJECTIVE We compared outcomes of AAD and/or beta-blocker (BB) therapy with those of VT ablation (with AAD/BB) in patients with ARVC who had recurrent VT.METHODS In a multicenter retrospective study, 110 patients with ARVC (mean age 38 +/- 17 years; 91[83%] men) with a minimum of 3 VT episodes were included; 77 (70%) were initially treated with AAD/BB and 32 (29%) underwent ablation. Subsequently, 43 of the 77 patients treated with AAD/BB alone also underwent ablation. Overall, 75 patients underwent ablation.RESULTS When comparing initial AAD/BB therapy (n = 77) and VT ablation (n = 32) after >= 3 VT episodes, a single ablation procedure rendered 35% of patients free of VT at 3 years compared with 28% of AAD/BB-only-treated patients (P =.46). Of the 77 AAD/BB-only-treated patients, 43 subsequently underwent ablation. For all 75 patients who underwent ablation, 56% were VT-free at 3 years after the last ablation procedure. Epicardial ablation was used in 40/75 (53%) and was associated with lower VT recurrence after the last ablation procedure (endocardial/epicardial vs endocardial-only; 71% vs 47% 3-year VT-free survival; P =.05). Importantly, there was no difference in survival free of death or transplantation between the ablation- and AAD/BB-only-treated patients (P =.61).CONCLUSION In patients with ARVC and a high VT burden, mortality and transplantation-free survival are not significantly different between drug- and ablation-treated patients. These patients have a high risk of recurrent VT despite drug therapy. Combined endocardial/epicardial ablation is associated with reduced VT recurrence as compared with endocardial-only ablation. Show less
Siontis, K.C.; Kim, H.M.; Stevenson, W.G.; Fujii, A.; Bella, P. della; Vergara, P.; ... ; Bogun, F.M. 2016
