PURPOSE: We evaluated whether the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) pandemic was associated with changes in the pattern of acute cardiovascular admissions across European... Show morePURPOSE: We evaluated whether the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) pandemic was associated with changes in the pattern of acute cardiovascular admissions across European centers.METHODS: We set-up a multicenter, multinational, pan-European observational registry in 15 centers from 12 countries. All consecutive acute admissions to emergency departments and cardiology departments throughout a 1-month period during the COVID-19 outbreak were compared with an equivalent 1-month period in 2019. The acute admissions to cardiology departments were classified into 5 major categories: acute coronary syndrome, acute heart failure, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, and other.RESULTS: Data from 54,331 patients were collected and analyzed. Nine centers provided data on acute admissions to emergency departments comprising 50,384 patients: 20,226 in 2020 compared with 30,158 in 2019 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] with 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.66 [0.58-0.76]). The risk of death at the emergency departments was higher in 2020 compared to 2019 (odds ratio [OR] with 95% CI: 4.1 [3.0-5.8], P < 0.0001). All 15 centers provided data on acute cardiology departments admissions: 3007 patients in 2020 and 4452 in 2019; IRR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.64-0.71). In 2020, there were fewer admissions with IRR (95% CI): acute coronary syndrome: 0.68 (0.63-0.73); acute heart failure: 0.65 (0.58-0.74); arrhythmia: 0.66 (0.60-0.72); and other: 0.68(0.62-0.76). We found a relatively higher percentage of pulmonary embolism admissions in 2020: odds ratio (95% CI): 1.5 (1.1-2.1), P = 0.02. Among patients with acute coronary syndrome, there were fewer admissions with unstable angina: 0.79 (0.66-0.94); non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: 0.56 (0.50-0.64); and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 0.78 (0.68-0.89).CONCLUSION: In the European centers during the COVID-19 outbreak, there were fewer acute cardiovascular admissions. Also, fewer patients were admitted to the emergency departments with 4 times higher death risk at the emergency departments. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. Show less
Flanagan, M.; Clancy, C.; Sorensen, J.; Thompson, L.; Kranenbarg, E.M.K.; Velde, C.J.H. van de; ... ; Burke, J. 2021
Background There is no consensus on the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for tumors of the upper third of the rectum. Due to conflicting findings in high-quality trials and significant long-term... Show moreBackground There is no consensus on the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for tumors of the upper third of the rectum. Due to conflicting findings in high-quality trials and significant long-term side effects associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy, the benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for upper third rectal tumors is less certain than for lower two third rectal tumors. This metaanalysis compares oncological outcomes with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for upper third rectal tumors. Patients and Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable rectal cancer were included. Individual patient data were sought from the principal investigator of each eligible trial for comparative data on patients with upper third rectal tumors. The main outcomes measured were survival outcomes, oncological outcomes, postoperative morbidity, and late toxicity. Results Individual patient data from two RCTs examining outcomes in 758 patients were obtained. Published data from one further RCT containing comparable data on upper third rectal tumors were included in analysis of local recurrence. In patients with curative surgery, there was no significant reduction in local recurrence or significant improvement in overall survival or disease-free survival with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (LR RR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.14-1.04, p = 0.06) (OS RR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.98-1.24, p = 0.11) (DFS RR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.97-1.26, p = 0.13). Conclusions The benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for upper third rectal tumors is not certain, and surgery alone for patients with potentially curative disease at preoperative staging may be sufficient. Show less
