There is a lack of knowledge regarding the definition, classification and appropriate treatment of malignant lateral lymph nodes in patients with (locally advanced) rectal cancer. This thesis aimed... Show moreThere is a lack of knowledge regarding the definition, classification and appropriate treatment of malignant lateral lymph nodes in patients with (locally advanced) rectal cancer. This thesis aimed to increase this knowledge and improve treatment practices for this population. Show less
Sluckin, T.C.; Hazen, S.M.J.A.; Horsthuis, K.; Beets-Tan, R.G.H.; Antonisse, I.E.; Berbee, M.; ... ; Dutch Snapshot Res Grp 2023
Background & purpose: Involved internal iliac and obturator lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are a known risk factor for ipsi-lateral local recurrences (LLR) in rectal cancer. This study examined... Show moreBackground & purpose: Involved internal iliac and obturator lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are a known risk factor for ipsi-lateral local recurrences (LLR) in rectal cancer. This study examined coverage of LLNs with routine radiotherapy practice in the Netherlands and associated LLR rates. Materials & methods: Patients with a primary tumor ≤8cm of the anorectal junction, cT3-4 stage and at least one internal iliac or obturator LLN with short-axis ≥5mm who received neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, were selected from a national, cross-sectional study of rectal cancer patients treated in the Netherlands in 2016. MR-images and radiotherapy treatment plans were reviewed regarding segmented LLNs as gross-tumor volume (GTV), location of LLNs within clinical target volume (CTV), and received proportion of the planned radiotherapy dose. Results: A total of 223 out of 3057 patients with at least one LLN ≥5mm were selected. Of those, 180 (80.7%) LLNs were inside the CTV, of which 60 (33.3%) were segmented as GTV. Overall, 202 LLNs (90.6%) received >95% of the planned dose. Four-year LLR rates were not significantly higher for LLNs situated outside the CTV compared to inside (4.0% vs. 12.5%, p=.092) or when receiving <95% versus >95% of the planned radiotherapy dose (7.1% vs. 11.3%, p=.843), respectively. Two of seven patients who received a dose-escalation of 60Gy developed a LLR (4-year LLR rate 28.6%). Conclusion: This evaluation of routine radiotherapy practice showed that adequate coverage of LLNs was still associated with considerable 4-year LLR rates. Techniques resulting in better local control for patients with involved LLNs need to be explored further. Show less
Background. Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of... Show moreBackground. Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level.Methods. Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either 'node-picking' (the removal of an individual LLN) or 'partial regional node dissection' (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (=7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection.Results. Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2-2.5, p = 0.874).Conclusion. Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research. Show less
Background: There is an ongoing discussion regarding the prognostic implications of the presence, short-axis diameter and location of lateral lymph nodes.Objective: To analyze lateral lymph node... Show moreBackground: There is an ongoing discussion regarding the prognostic implications of the presence, short-axis diameter and location of lateral lymph nodes.Objective: To analyze lateral lymph node characteristics, the role of downsizing on restaging MRI and associated local recurrence rates for patients with cT3-4 rectal cancer after MRI re-review and training.Design: Retrospective population-based cross-sectional study. Settings: This collaborative project was led by local investigators from surgery and radiology departments in 60 Dutch hospitals.Patients: 3057 patients underwent rectal cancer surgery in 2016: 1109 had cT3-4 tumor located ≤8cm from the anorectal junction of which 890 received neoadjuvant therapy. Interventions(s): NoneMain Outcome Measures: local recurrence and ipsi-lateral local recurrence rates. Results: Re-review identified 314 patients (35%) with visible lateral lymph nodes. 30 of these patients had either only long-stretched obturator (n=13) or external iliac (n=17) nodes and both did not lead to any lateral local recurrences. The presence of internal iliac/obturator lateral lymph nodes (n=284) resulted in 4-year local recurrence and lateral local recurrence rates of 16.4% and 8.8%, respectively. Enlarged (≥7mm) lateral lymph nodes (n=122) resulted in higher 4-year local recurrence (20.8%, 13.1%, 0%, p<.001) and lateral local recurrence (14.7%, 4.4%, 0%, p<.001) rates compared to smaller and no lateral lymph nodes, respectively. Visible lateral lymph nodes (hazard ratio 1.8(1.1-2.8)) and enlarged lateral lymph nodes (hazard ratio 1.9(1.1-3.5)) were independently associated with local recurrence in multivariable analysis. Enlarged lateral lymph nodes with malignant features had higher 4-year LLR rates of 17.0%. Downsizing had no impact on lateral local recurrence rates. Enlarged lateral lymph nodes were associated with higher univariate 4-year distant metastasis rates (36.4% 24.4%, p=.021), but not in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.3(0.9-1.8)), and did not worsen overall survival. Limitations: This study was limited by the retrospective design and total number of patients with lateral lymph nodes.Conclusions: The risk of lateral local recurrence due to (enlarged) lateral lymph nodes was confirmed, but without prognostic impact of downsizing after neoadjuvant therapy. These results point towards the incorporation of primary lateral lymph node size into treatment planning. Show less
Objectives The presence and size of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are important factors influencing treatment decisions for rectal cancer. Awareness of the clinical relevance and describing LLNs in... Show moreObjectives The presence and size of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are important factors influencing treatment decisions for rectal cancer. Awareness of the clinical relevance and describing LLNs in MRI reports is therefore essential. This study assessed whether LLNs were mentioned in primary MRI reports at a national level and investigated the concordance with standardised re-review. Methods This national, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study included 1096 patients from 60 hospitals treated in 2016 for primary cT3-4 rectal cancer <= 8 cm from the anorectal junction. Abdominal radiologists re-reviewed all MR images following a 2-h training regarding LLNs. Results Re-review of MR images identified that 41.0% of enlarged (>= 7 mm) LLNs were not mentioned in primary MRI reports. A contradictory anatomical location was stated for 73.2% of all LLNs and a different size (>=/< 7 mm) for 41.7%. In total, 49.4% of all cases did not mention LLNs in primary MRI reports. Reporting LLNs was associated with stage (cT3N0 44.3%, T3N+/T4 52.8%, p = 0.013), cN stage (N0 44.1%, N1 48.6%, N2 59.5%, p < 0.001), hospital type (non-teaching 34.6%, teaching 52.2%, academic 53.2% p = 0.006) and annual rectal cancer resection volumes (low 34.8%, medium 47.7%, high 57.3% p < 0.001). For LLNs present according to original MRI reports (n = 226), 64.2% also mentioned a short-axis size, 52.7% an anatomical location and 25.2% whether it was deemed suspicious. Conclusions Almost half of the primary MRI reports for rectal cancer patients treated in the Netherlands in 2016 did not mention LLNs. A significant portion of enlarged LLNs identified during re-review were also not mentioned originally, with considerable discrepancies for location and size. These results imply insufficient awareness and indicate the need for templates, education and training. Show less
Objectives: Presence and size of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are important factors influencing treatment decisions for rectal cancer. Awareness of the clinical relevance and describing LLNs in MRI... Show moreObjectives: Presence and size of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are important factors influencing treatment decisions for rectal cancer. Awareness of the clinical relevance and describing LLNs in MRI-reports, is therefore essential. This study assessed whether LLNs were mentioned in primary MRI-reports at a national level and investigated the concordance with standardized re-review. Methods: This national, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study included 1096 patients from 60 hospitals treated in 2016 for primary cT3-4 rectal cancer ≤8cm from the anorectal junction. Abdominal radiologists re-reviewed all MR-images after following a 2-hour training regarding LLNs. Results: Re-review of MR-images identified 41.0% of enlarged (≥7mm) LLNs were not mentioned in primary MRI-reports and a contradictory anatomical location was stated for 73.2% of all LLNs and a different size (≥/<7mm) for 41.7%. In total, 49.4% of cases did not mention LLNs in primary MRI-reports. Reporting LLNs was associated with stage (cT3N0 44.3%, T3N+/T4 52.8%, p=.013), cN-stage (N0 44.1%, N1 48.6%, N2 59.5%, p<.001), hospital type (non-teaching 34.6%, teaching 52.2%, academic 53.2% p=.006) and annual rectal cancer resection volumes (low 34.8%, medium 47.7%, high 57.3% p<.001). For LLNs identified during re-review (n=226), 64.2% original reports mentioned short-axis size, 52.7% location and 25.2% suspiciousness. Conclusions: Almost half of primary MRI-reports for rectal cancer patients treated in the Netherlands in 2016, did not mention LLNs. A significant portion of enlarged LLNs identified during re-review were also not mentioned originally, with considerable discrepancies for location and size. These results imply insufficient awareness and indicate the need for templates, education and training. Show less
Western and Eastern practices have traditionally differed in their approach to treating lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer. While Western clinicians have primarily favored neoadjuvant (chemo... Show moreWestern and Eastern practices have traditionally differed in their approach to treating lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer. While Western clinicians have primarily favored neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy to sterilize lateral compartments, Eastern physicians have often opted for the surgical removed of lymphatic tissue with a lateral lymph node dissection without neoadjuvant treatment. The literature suggests similar oncological outcomes for these two separate techniques, while tangible differences exist. The combination of these paradigms may be beneficial in reducing overall morbidity while sustaining low recurrence rates. This article considers traditional Eastern and Western perspectives, discusses nodal features important for predicting malignancy and attempts to stimulate international, multidisciplinary consensus and collaboration. Show less
