Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fractures in the elderly. The optimal treatment remains controversial. The aim of this... Show moreStudy Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fractures in the elderly. The optimal treatment remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare results of a low-threshold-for-surgery strategy (surgery for dislocated fractures in relatively healthy patients) to a primarily-conservative strategy (for all patients). Methods Patient records from 5 medical centers were reviewed for patients who met the selection criteria (e.g. age & GE;55 years, type II/III odontoid fractures). Demographics, fracture types/characteristics, fracture union/stability, clinical outcome and mortality were compared. The influence of age on outcome was studied (& GE;55-80 vs & GE;80 years). Results A total of 173 patients were included: 120 treated with low-threshold-for-surgery (of which 22 primarily operated, and 23 secondarily) vs 53 treated primarily-conservative. No differences in demographics and fracture characteristics between the groups were identified. Fracture union (53% vs 43%) and fracture stability (90% vs 85%) at last follow-up did not differ between groups. The majority of patients (56%) achieved clinical improvement compared to baseline. Analysis of differences in clinical outcome between groups was infeasible due to data limitations. In both strategies, patients & GE;80 years achieved worse union (64% vs 30%), worse stability (97% vs 77%), and - as to be expected - increased mortality <104 weeks (2% vs 22%). Conclusions Union and stability rates did not differ between the treatment strategies. Advanced age (& GE;80 years) negatively influenced both radiological outcome and mortality. No cases of secondary neurological deficits were identified, suggesting that concerns for the consequences of under-treatment may be unjustified. Show less
Martin, E.; Coert, J.H.; Flucke, U.E.; Slooff, W.B.M.; Ho, V.K.Y.; Graaf, W.T. van der; ... ; Verhoef, C. 2020
Background: Despite curative intents of treatment in localized malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs), prognosis remains poor. This study investigated survival and prognostic factors... Show moreBackground: Despite curative intents of treatment in localized malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs), prognosis remains poor. This study investigated survival and prognostic factors for overall survival in non-retroperitoneal and retroperitoneal MPNSTs in the Netherlands.Methods: Data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Pathology Database. All primary MPNSTs were collected. Paediatric cases (age <= 18 years) and synchronous metastases were excluded from analyses. Separate Cox proportional hazard models were made for retroperitoneal and non-retroperitoneal MPNSTs.Results: A total of 629 localized adult MPNSTs (35 retroperitoneal cases, 5.5%) were included for analysis. In surgically resected patients (88.1%), radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered in 44.2% and 6.7%, respectively. In retroperitoneal cases, significantly less radiotherapy and more chemotherapy were applied. In non-retroperitoneal MPNSTs, older age (60+), presence of NF1, size >5 cm, and deep-seated tumours were independently associated with worse survival. In retroperitoneal MPNSTs, male sex and age of 60+ years were independently associated with worse survival. Survival of R1 and that of R0 resections were similar for any location, whereas R2 resections were associated with worse outcomes. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy administrations were not associated with survival.Conclusion: In localized MPNSTs, risk stratification for survival can be done using several patient-and tumour-specific characteristics. Resectability is the most important predictor for survival in MPNSTs. No difference is present between R1 and R0 resections in both retroperitoneal and non-retroperitoneal MPNSTs. The added value of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is unclear. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. Show less
Martin, E.; Coert, J.H.; Flucke, U.E.; Slooff, W.B.M.; Sande, M.A. van de; Noesel, M.M. van; ... ; Verhoef, C. 2019
Background Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are rare and aggressive non-rhabdomyoblastic soft-tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) in children. This study set out to investigate clinical... Show moreBackground Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are rare and aggressive non-rhabdomyoblastic soft-tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) in children. This study set out to investigate clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and factors associated with survival in pediatric MPNST using Dutch nationwide databases. Methods Data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and the Dutch Pathology Database (PALGA) from 1989 to 2017. All primary MPNSTs were collected. Demographic differences were analyzed between adult and pediatric (age <= 18 years) MPNST. In children, demographic and treatment differences between neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and non-NF1 were analyzed. A Cox proportional hazard model was constructed for localized pediatric MPNSTs. Results A total of 70/784 MPNST patients were children (37.1% NF1). Children did not present differently from adults. In NF1 children, tumor size was more commonly large (> 5 cm, 92.3% vs 59.1%). Localized disease was primarily resected in 90.6%, and radiotherapy was administered in 37.5%. Non-NF1 children tended to receive chemotherapy more commonly (39.5% vs 26.9%). Overall, estimated five-year survival rates of localized NF1-MPNST was 52.4% (SE: 10.1%) compared with 75.8% (SE: 7.1%) in non-NF1 patients. The multivariate model showed worse survival in NF1 patients (HR: 2.98; 95% CI, 1.17-7.60, P = 0.02) and increased survival in patients diagnosed after 2005 (HR: 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69, P = 0.01). No treatment factors were independently associated with survival. Conclusion Pediatric MPNSTs have presentations similar to adult MPNSTs. In children, NF1 patients present with larger tumors, but are treated similarly to non-NF1 MPNSTs. In localized pediatric MPNST, NF1 is associated with worse survival. Promisingly, survival has increased for pediatric MPNSTs after 2005. Show less
