Background: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a mono-articular, soft-tissue tumor. Although it can behave locally aggressively, D-TGCT is a nonmalignant disease. This is the... Show moreBackground: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a mono-articular, soft-tissue tumor. Although it can behave locally aggressively, D-TGCT is a nonmalignant disease. This is the first study describing the natural course of D-TGCT and evaluating active surveillance as possible treatment strategy. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included therapy naïve patients with D-TGCT from eight sarcoma centers worldwide between 2000 and 2019. Patients initially managed by active surveillance following their first consultation were eligible. Data regarding the radiological and clinical course and subsequent treatments were collected. Results: Sixty-one patients with primary D-TGCT were initially managed by active surveillance. Fifty-nine patients had an MRI performed around first consultation: DTGCT was located intra-articular in most patients (n = 56; 95 %) and extra-articular in 14 cases (24 %). At baseline, osteoarthritis was observed in 13 patients (22 %) on MRI. Most of the patients’ reported symptoms: pain (n = 43; 70 %), swelling (n = 33; 54 %). Eight patients (13 %) were asymptomatic. Follow-up data were available for 58 patients; the median follow-up was 28 months. Twenty-one patients (36 %) had radiological progression after 21 months (median). Eight of 45 patients (18 %) without osteoarthritis at baseline developed osteoarthritis during follow-up. Thirty-seven patients (64 %) did not clinically deteriorate during follow-up. Finally, eighteen patients (31 %) required a subsequent treatment. Conclusion: Active surveillance can be considered adequate for selected therapy naïve D-TGCT patients. Although follow-up data was limited, almost two-thirds of the patients remained progression-free, and 69 % did not need treatment during the follow-up period. However, one-fifth of patients developed secondary osteoarthritis. Prospective studies on active surveillance are warranted. Show less
Spierenburg, G.; Verspoor, F.G.M.; Wunder, J.S.; Griffin, A.M.; Ferguson, P.C.; Houdek, M.T.; ... ; Sande, M.A.J. van de 2023
Simple Summary Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a rare disease that can be located on the knee joints'anterior and posterior sides. Surgery approaching both sides of the knee... Show moreSimple Summary Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a rare disease that can be located on the knee joints'anterior and posterior sides. Surgery approaching both sides of the knee is often performed to remove the tumor. However, there is no consensus on whether surgery on both sides should be performed during one procedure or in two separate interventions. In this retrospective, cohort study, 191 patients were included from nine sarcoma centers worldwide. The goal was to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of two-sided surgeries for D-TGCTs of the knee, performed in either one or two stages. Surgery on the knee's anterior and posterior sides performed in one stage did not result in impaired rehabilitation compared to two-stage surgery. Additionally, patients undergoing surgery in one stage had a shorter hospital stay and no more complications. Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors' (D-TGCTs) intra- and extra-articular expansion about the knee often necessitates an anterior and posterior surgical approach to facilitate an extensive synovectomy. There is no consensus on whether two-sided synovectomies should be performed in one or two stages. This retrospective study included 191 D-TGCT patients from nine sarcoma centers worldwide to compare the postoperative short-term outcomes between both treatments. Secondary outcomes were rates of radiological progression and subsequent treatments. Between 2000 and 2020, 117 patients underwent one-stage and 74 patients underwent two-stage synovectomies. The maximum range of motion achieved within one year postoperatively was similar (flexion 123-120 degrees, p = 0.109; extension 0 degrees, p = 0.093). Patients undergoing two-stage synovectomies stayed longer in the hospital (6 vs. 4 days, p < 0.0001). Complications occurred more often after two-stage synovectomies, although this was not statistically different (36% vs. 24%, p = 0.095). Patients treated with two-stage synovectomies exhibited more radiological progression and required subsequent treatments more often than patients treated with one-stage synovectomies (52% vs. 37%, p = 0.036) (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.007). In conclusion, D-TGCT of the knee requiring two-side synovectomies should be treated by one-stage synovectomies if feasible, since patients achieve a similar range of motion, do not have more complications, but stay for a shorter time in the hospital. Show less
