Healthcare is under pressure: an ageing population, healthcare-staff shortage, quality (healthcare outcomes) must increase and costs must be reduced.Yet, what are the outcomes of healthcare?For... Show moreHealthcare is under pressure: an ageing population, healthcare-staff shortage, quality (healthcare outcomes) must increase and costs must be reduced.Yet, what are the outcomes of healthcare?For some conditions, quality of care is measured for every patient. Unfortunately, this is not the case for prostate cancer and lumbar disk herniation in the Netherlands. We used claims data to evaluate healthcare outcomes and volume-outcome relationships.Examples of our results:Prostate cancer:• More than 30% of patients is incontinent 1 year after radical prostatectomy• Large differences between hospitals (19%-85%)• Risk of incontinence is 52% lower at highest-volume hospitalsLumbar disk herniation:• One year after hernia surgery, 23% of patients have one or more undesirable outcomes (e.g. re-operation, use of opioids).• Wide variation in number of operations and outcomes per hospitalOur recommendations:• Reconsider the disproportionately strict interpretation of the GDPR (AVG) for healthcare research• Unlock the huge potential of healthcare research based on existing data • Make routine measurement of healthcare outcomes a national standard, for prostate cancer even on a per surgeon level• Centralization of care should be combined with outcome measurement• Hospitals should share healthcare outcomes with patients• Our results urge doctors, health insurers, patient organizations and policymakers to take action Show less
Schepens, M.H.J.; Hooff, M.L. van; Galien, O. van der; Plantes, C.M.P.Z. des; Somford, D.M.; Leeuwen, P.J. van; ... ; Limbeek, J. van 2023
BackgroundOn the basis of previous analyses of the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), the hospital RP volume threshold in the Netherlands was gradually... Show moreBackgroundOn the basis of previous analyses of the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), the hospital RP volume threshold in the Netherlands was gradually increased from 20 per year in 2017, to 50 in 2018 and 100 from 2019 onwards.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of hospital RP volumes on the incidence and risk of UI after RP (RP-UI).Design, setting, and participantsPatients who underwent RP during 2016–2020 were identified in the claims database of the largest health insurance company in the Netherlands. Incontinence was defined as an insurance claim for ≥1 pads/d.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe relationship between hospital RP volume (HV) and RP-UI was assessed via multivariable analysis adjusted for age, comorbidity, postoperative radiotherapy, and lymph node dissection.Results and limitationsRP-UI incidence nationwide and by RP volume category did not decrease significantly during the study period, and 5-yr RP-UI rates varied greatly among hospitals (19–85%). However, low-volume hospitals (≤120 RPs/yr) had a higher percentage of patients with RP-UI and higher variation in comparison to high-volume hospitals (>120 RPs/yr). In comparison to hospitals with low RP volumes throughout the study period, the risk of RP-UI was 29% lower in hospitals shifting from the low-volume to the high-volume category (>120 RPs/yr) and 52% lower in hospitals with a high RP volume throughout the study period (>120 RPs/yr for 5 yr).ConclusionsA focus on increasing hospital RP volumes alone does not seem to be sufficient to reduce the incidence of RP-UI, at least in the short term. Measurement of outcomes, preferably per surgeon, and the introduction of quality assurance programs are recommended.Patient summaryIn the Netherlands, centralization of surgery to remove the prostate (RP) because of cancer has not yet improved the occurrence of urinary incontinence (UI) after surgery. Hospitals performing more than 120 RP operations per year had better UI outcomes. However, there was a big difference in UI outcomes between hospitals. Show less
Schepens, M.H.J.; Trompert, A.C.; Hooff, M.L. van; Velde, E. van der; Kallewaard, M.; Verberk-Jonkers, I.J.A.M.; ... ; Wouters, M.W.J.M. 2023
Background Reuse of health care data for various purposes, such as the care process, for quality measurement, research, and finance, will become increasingly important in the future; therefore, ... Show moreBackground Reuse of health care data for various purposes, such as the care process, for quality measurement, research, and finance, will become increasingly important in the future; therefore, "Collect Once Use Many Times" (COUMT). Clinical information models (CIMs) can be used for content standardization. Data collection for national quality registries (NQRs) often requires manual data entry or batch processing. Preferably, NQRs collect required data by extracting data recorded during the health care process and stored in the electronic health record.Objectives The first objective of this study was to analyze the level of coverage of data elements in NQRs with developed Dutch CIMs (DCIMs). The second objective was to analyze the most predominant DCIMs, both in terms of the coverage of data elements as well as in their prevalence across existing NQRs.Methods For the first objective, a mapping method was used which consisted of six steps, ranging from a description of the clinical pathway to a detailed mapping of data elements. For the second objective, the total number of data elements that matched with a specific DCIM was counted and divided by the total number of evaluated data elements.Results An average of 83.0% (standard deviation: 11.8%) of data elements in studied NQRs could be mapped to existing DCIMs . In total, 5 out of 100 DCIMs were needed to map 48.6% of the data elements.Conclusion This study substantiates the potential of using existing DCIMs for data collection in Dutch NQRs and gives direction to further implementation of DCIMs. The developed method is applicable to other domains. For NQRs, implementation should start with the five DCIMs that are most prevalently used in the NQRs. Furthermore, a national agreement on the leading principle of COUMT for the use and implementation for DCIMs and (inter)national code lists is needed. Show less
