The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely... Show moreThe American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely benign, variant of unknown significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Here, we present a variant classification model that can be an add-on or alternative to ACMG classification: A stepwise system that can classify any type of genetic variant (e.g., hypomorphic alleles, imprinted alleles, copy number variants, runs of homozygosity, enhancer variants, and variants related to traits). We call it the ABC system because classification is first functional (A), then clinical (B), and optionally a standard comment that fits the clinical question is selected (C). Both steps A and B have 1-5 grading when knowledge is sufficient, if not, class "zero" is assigned. Functional grading (A) only concerns biological consequences with the stages normal function (1), likely normal function (2), hypothetical functional effect (3), likely functional effect (4), and proven functional effect (5). Clinical grading (B) is genotype-phenotype focused with the stages "right type of gene" (1), risk factor (2), and pathogenic (3-5, depending on penetrance). Both grades are listed for each variant and combined to generate a joint class ranging from A to F. Importantly, the A-F classes are linked to standard comments, reflecting laboratory or national policy. In step A, the VUS class is split into class 0 (true unknown) and class 3 (hypothetical functional effect based on molecular predictions or de novo occurrence), providing a rationale for variant-of-interest reporting when the clinical picture could fit the finding. The system gives clinicians a better guide to variant significance. Show less
Sluiter, R.L.; Marrewijk, C. van; Jong, D. de; Scheffer, H.; Guchelaar, H.J.; Derijks, L.; ... ; Coenen, M.J.H. 2019
Background and Aims: Decreased thiopurine S-methyltransferase [TPMT] enzyme activity increases the risk of haematological adverse drug reactions [ADRs] in patients treated with thiopurines.... Show moreBackground and Aims: Decreased thiopurine S-methyltransferase [TPMT] enzyme activity increases the risk of haematological adverse drug reactions [ADRs] in patients treated with thiopurines. Clinical studies have shown that in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], pharmacogenetic TPMT-guided thiopurine treatment reduces this risk of ADRs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this intervention impacts on healthcare costs and/or quality of life.Methods: An a priori defined cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in the Thiopurine response Optimization by Pharmacogenetic testing in Inflammatory bowel disease Clinics [TOPIC] trial, a randomized controlled trial performed in 30 Dutch hospitals. Patients diagnosed with IBD [age >= 18 years] were randomly assigned to the intervention [i.e. pre-treatment genotyping] or control group. Total costs in terms of volumes of care, and effects in quality-adjusted life years [QALYs], based on EuroQol-5D3L utility scores, were measured for 20 weeks. Mean incremental cost savings and QALYs with confidence intervals were calculated using non-parametric bootstrapping with 1000 replications.Results: The intervention group consisted of 381 patients and the control group 347 patients. The mean incremental cost savings were (sic)52 per patient [95% percentiles -682, 569]. Mean incremental QALYs were 0.001 [95% percentiles -0.009, 0.010]. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust for potential change in costs of screening, costs of biologicals and costs associated with productivity loss.Conclusions: Genotype-guided thiopurine treatment in IBD patients reduced the risk of ADRs among patients carrying a TPMT variant, without increasing overall healthcare costs and resulting in comparable quality of life, as compared to standard treatment. Show less
