For more than 40 years, the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen has been the cornerstone of the endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients. However, a wide... Show moreFor more than 40 years, the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen has been the cornerstone of the endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients. However, a wide variability in response to therapy is still observed since disease recurrence happens in nearly 30 % of breast cancer patients. Tamoxifen has a complex metabolism and it is mainly metabolized by CYP2D6 enzyme, among others, into endoxifen, the most active metabolite of tamoxifen.In the search of a manner in order to individualize endocrine therapy with tamoxifen, CYP2D6 genotyping and therapeutic drug monitoring based on endoxifen serum concentrations were proposed as potential manners to individualize tamoxifen efficacy. Both approaches have been an ongoing discussion and many studies have been published claiming both negative and positive associations. This thesis mainly focusses on CYP2D6 genotyping and endoxifen concentrations and their impact on clinical survival outcome in early breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Show less
CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 might influence tamoxifen metabolism and clinical outcome. Our aim was to investigate the effect of CYP2C19 genotypes on tamoxifen concentrations and metabolic ratios (MRs)... Show moreCYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 might influence tamoxifen metabolism and clinical outcome. Our aim was to investigate the effect of CYP2C19 genotypes on tamoxifen concentrations and metabolic ratios (MRs) and breast cancer recurrence in a large cohort of Caucasian women. Genetic variants (CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes), tamoxifen and metabolites concentrations, baseline characteristics, and breast cancer recurrence from the CYPTAM study (NTR1509) were used. CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 genotypes were evaluated as alleles and as groups based on CYP2D6 genotypes (high, intermediate and low activity). Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate differences in recurrence defined as relapse-free survival (RFS). Classification tree analyses (CTAs) were conducted to assess the levels of interactions per polymorphism (CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes) on endoxifen concentrations. No differences in mean concentrations and MRs were observed when comparing CYP2C19 genotypes (CYP2C19*1/*1; CYP2C19*1/*2; CYP2C19*2/*2; CYP2C19*1/*17; CYP2C19*17/*17; CYP2C19*2/*17). Only significant differences (p value<0.05) in mean concentrations and MRs were observed when comparing tamoxifen activity groups (high, intermediate and low activity). A log-rank test did not find an association across CYP2C19 genotypes (p value 0.898). CTAs showed a significant relationship between CYP2D6 and endoxifen (p value<0.0001), but no association with CYP2C19 genotypes was found. CYP2C19 polymorphisms do not have a significant impact on tamoxifen metabolism or breast cancer relapse. Show less
Purpose Tamoxifen is part of endocrine therapy in breast cancer treatment. Studies have indicated the use of endoxifen concentrations, tamoxifen active metabolite, to guide tamoxifen efficacy.... Show morePurpose Tamoxifen is part of endocrine therapy in breast cancer treatment. Studies have indicated the use of endoxifen concentrations, tamoxifen active metabolite, to guide tamoxifen efficacy. Three endoxifen thresholds have been suggested (5.9 ng/ml, 5.2 ng/ml and 3.3 ng/ml) for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Our aim was to validate these thresholds and to examine endoxifen exposure with clinical outcome in early-breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. Methods Data from 667 patients from the CYPTAM study (NTR1509) were available. Patients were stratified (above or below), according to the endoxifen threshold values for tamoxifen efficacy and tested by Cox regression. Logistic regressions to estimate the probability of relapse and tamoxifen discontinuation were performed. Results None of the thresholds showed a statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival: 5.2 ng/ml threshold: hazard ratio (HR): 2.545, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.912-7.096,pvalue: 0.074; 3.3 ng/ml threshold: HR: 0.728; 95% CI 0.421-1.258,pvalue: 0.255. Logistic regression did not show a statistically significant association between the risk of relapse (odds ratio (OR): 0.971 (95% CI 0.923-1.021,pvalue: 0.248) and the risk for tamoxifen discontinuation (OR: 1.006 95% CI 0.961-1.053,pvalue: 0.798) with endoxifen concentrations. Conclusion Our findings do not confirm the endoxifen threshold values for TDM nor does it allow definition of a novel threshold. These findings indicate a limited value of TDM to guide tamoxifen efficacy. Show less
