AIMS\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSION\n To assess safety and tolerability and explore pharmacodynamics and efficacy of omiganan in external anogenital warts (AGW) and vulvar high-grade squamous... Show moreAIMS\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSION\n To assess safety and tolerability and explore pharmacodynamics and efficacy of omiganan in external anogenital warts (AGW) and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL).\nTwo randomized controlled trials in patients with external AGW and vulvar HSIL were conducted. Patients received topical omiganan 2.5% or placebo gel once daily for 12 weeks with a follow-up of 12 weeks. Safety and tolerability were monitored and pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of omiganan were assessed by analysing lesion count, size and viral load. Self-reported pain, itch and quality of life were assessed by an electronic diary and questionnaire.\nTwenty-four AGW and 12 vulvar HSIL patients were enrolled. All patients had a high treatment adherence (99%). No serious adverse events occurred and all adverse events (n = 27) were mild, transient and self-limiting. The treatment groups were not different in terms of safety and tolerability, lesion count and size, and patient-reported outcomes pain, itch and quality of life. Human papillomavirus load significantly reduced after 12 weeks of treatment with omiganan compared to placebo (-96.6%; 95% confidence interval -99.9 to -7.4%; P = .045) in AGW patients only.\nTopical omiganan appears to be safe in patients with AGW and vulvar HSIL and reduced human papillomavirus load after 12 weeks of treatment in AGW patients. Show less
Niemeyer-van der Kolk, T.; Wall, H. van der; Hogendoorn, G.K.; Rijneveld, R.; Luijten, S.; Alewijk, D.C.J.G. van; ... ; Doorn, M.B.A. van 2020
Omiganan is an indolicidin analog with antimicrobial properties that could be beneficial for patients with atopic dermatitis. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial we... Show moreOmiganan is an indolicidin analog with antimicrobial properties that could be beneficial for patients with atopic dermatitis. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial we explored the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of topical omiganan once daily in 36 patients with mild to moderate atomic dermatitis. Patients were randomized to apply topical omiganan 1%, omiganan 2.5%, or vehicle gel to one target lesion once daily for 28 consecutive days. Small but significant improvements in local objective SCORing Atopic Dematitis index and morning itch were observed in the omiganan 2.5% group compared with the vehicle gel group (-18.5%; 95% confidence interval, -32.9 to -1.0; P = 0.04; and -8.2; 95% confidence interval, -16.3 to -0.2; P = 0.05, respectively). A shift from lesional to nonlesional skin microbiota was observed in both omiganan treatment groups, in contrast to the vehicle group. Thus, treatment with topical omiganan improved dysbiosis in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis, and small but statistically significant improvements in clinical scores were detected. Our findings warrant further exploration in future clinical trials. Show less
Rijsbergen, M.; Rijneveld, R.; Todd, M.; Feiss, G.L.; Kouwenhoven, S.T.P.; Quint, K.D.; ... ; Poelgeest, M.I.E. van 2020
Aims To assess safety and tolerability and explore pharmacodynamics and efficacy of omiganan in external anogenital warts (AGW) and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL).... Show moreAims To assess safety and tolerability and explore pharmacodynamics and efficacy of omiganan in external anogenital warts (AGW) and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Methods Two randomized controlled trials in patients with external AGW and vulvar HSIL were conducted. Patients received topical omiganan 2.5% or placebo gel once daily for 12 weeks with a follow-up of 12 weeks. Safety and tolerability were monitored and pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of omiganan were assessed by analysing lesion count, size and viral load. Self-reported pain, itch and quality of life were assessed by an electronic diary and questionnaire. Results Twenty-four AGW and 12 vulvar HSIL patients were enrolled. All patients had a high treatment adherence (99%). No serious adverse events occurred and all adverse events (n =27) were mild, transient and self-limiting. The treatment groups were not different in terms of safety and tolerability, lesion count and size, and patient-reported outcomes pain, itch and quality of life. Human papillomavirus load significantly reduced after 12 weeks of treatment with omiganan compared to placebo (-96.6%; 95% confidence interval -99.9 to -7.4%;P =.045) in AGW patients only. Conclusion Topical omiganan appears to be safe in patients with AGW and vulvar HSIL and reduced human papillomavirus load after 12 weeks of treatment in AGW patients. Show less
Rijsbergen, M.; Niemeyer-van der Kolk, T.; Rijneveld, R.; Pinckaers, J.H.F.M.; Meshcheriakov, I.; Bavinck, J.N.B.; ... ; Rissmann, R. 2020
BackgroundAssessment of treatment effects in clinical trials requires valid information on treatment adherence, adverse events and symptoms. Paper-based diaries are often inconvenient and have... Show moreBackgroundAssessment of treatment effects in clinical trials requires valid information on treatment adherence, adverse events and symptoms. Paper-based diaries are often inconvenient and have limited reliability, particularly for outpatient trials.ObjectivesTo investigate the utility of an electronic diary (e-diary) application for patients with skin diseases in outpatient clinical trials.MethodsAn e-diary application was developed and technically validated. Treatment adherence was defined as topical administration by the patient, and patient-reported outcomes, i.e. pain and itch, were evaluated by the e-diary in six clinical trials on newly tested topical drugs. Additionally, the proportion of patients capturing the applied topical drug by camera and filling in the pain and itch scores was defined as e-diary adherence, and patients' perception of usefulness and acceptability of the e-diary were evaluated.ResultsTreatment adherence rates of the included 256 patients were high (median 98%, range 97-99%). E-diary adherence was also high with a median of 93% (range 87-97%) for capturing the applied drug by camera, and 89% (range 87-96%) and 94% (range 87-96%) for entering respectively the itch and pain score. Daily symptom scores provided good insights into the disease burden, and patients rated the e-diary as good to excellent with respect to user acceptability.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the e-diary is an excellent way to ensure proper treatment administration, indicated by both the high user acceptability scores and high treatment adherence. Moreover, the e-diary may also be valuable for frequent and reliable monitoring of patient-reported outcomes in daily clinical practice. Show less
Rijsbergen, M.; Niemeyer-van der Kolk, T.; Rijneveld, R.; Pinckaers, J.H.F.M.; Meshcheriakov, I.; Bavinck, J.N.B.; ... ; Rissmann, R. 2020
BackgroundAssessment of treatment effects in clinical trials requires valid information on treatment adherence, adverse events and symptoms. Paper-based diaries are often inconvenient and have... Show moreBackgroundAssessment of treatment effects in clinical trials requires valid information on treatment adherence, adverse events and symptoms. Paper-based diaries are often inconvenient and have limited reliability, particularly for outpatient trials.ObjectivesTo investigate the utility of an electronic diary (e-diary) application for patients with skin diseases in outpatient clinical trials.MethodsAn e-diary application was developed and technically validated. Treatment adherence was defined as topical administration by the patient, and patient-reported outcomes, i.e. pain and itch, were evaluated by the e-diary in six clinical trials on newly tested topical drugs. Additionally, the proportion of patients capturing the applied topical drug by camera and filling in the pain and itch scores was defined as e-diary adherence, and patients' perception of usefulness and acceptability of the e-diary were evaluated.ResultsTreatment adherence rates of the included 256 patients were high (median 98%, range 97-99%). E-diary adherence was also high with a median of 93% (range 87-97%) for capturing the applied drug by camera, and 89% (range 87-96%) and 94% (range 87-96%) for entering respectively the itch and pain score. Daily symptom scores provided good insights into the disease burden, and patients rated the e-diary as good to excellent with respect to user acceptability.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the e-diary is an excellent way to ensure proper treatment administration, indicated by both the high user acceptability scores and high treatment adherence. Moreover, the e-diary may also be valuable for frequent and reliable monitoring of patient-reported outcomes in daily clinical practice. Show less
Rijsbergen, M.; Rijneveld, R.; Todd, M.; Pagan, L.; Feiss, G.; Koning, M.N.C. de; ... ; Poelgeest, M.I.E. van 2019
Background The quantification of human papilloma virus (HPV)-induced skin lesions is essential for the clinical assessment of the course of disease and the response to treatment. However, clinical... Show moreBackground The quantification of human papilloma virus (HPV)-induced skin lesions is essential for the clinical assessment of the course of disease and the response to treatment. However, clinical assessments that measure dimensions of lesions using a caliper do not provide complete insight into three-dimensional (3D) lesions, and its inter-rater variability is often poor. Objective The aim of this study was to validate a stereophotogrammetric 3D camera system for the quantification of HPV-induced lesions. Methods The camera system was validated for accuracy, precision and interoperator and inter-rater variability. Subsequently, 3D photographs were quantified and compared to caliper measurements for clinical validation by Bland-Altman modelling, based on data from 80 patients with cutaneous warts (CW), 24 with anogenital warts (AGW) patients and 12 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the vulva (vulvar HSIL) with a total lesion count of 220 CW, 74 AGW and 31 vulvar HSIL. Results Technical validation showed excellent accuracy [coefficients of variation (CV) <= 0.68%] and reproducibility (CVs <= 2%), a good to excellent agreement between operators (CVs <= 8.7%) and a good to excellent agreement between different raters for all three lesion types (ICCs >= 0.86). When comparing 3D with caliper measurements, excellent biases were found for diameter of AGW (long diameter 5%), good biases were found for diameter of AGW (short diameter 10%) and height of CW (8%), and acceptable biases were found for the diameter of CW (11%) and vulvar HSIL (short diameter 14%, long diameter 16%). An unfavourable difference between these methods (bias 25%) was found for the assessment of height of AGWs. Conclusion Stereophotogrammetric 3D imaging is an accurate and reliable method for the clinical visualization and quantification of HPV-induced skin lesions. Show less
Rijsbergen, M.; Pagan, L.; Niemeyer-van der Kolk, T.; Rijneveld, R.; Hogendoorn, G.; Lemoine, C.; ... ; Rissmann, R. 2019
Background The quantification of human papilloma virus (HPV)-induced skin lesions is essential for the clinical assessment of the course of disease and the response to treatment. However, clinical... Show moreBackground The quantification of human papilloma virus (HPV)-induced skin lesions is essential for the clinical assessment of the course of disease and the response to treatment. However, clinical assessments that measure dimensions of lesions using a caliper do not provide complete insight into three-dimensional (3D) lesions, and its inter-rater variability is often poor. Objective The aim of this study was to validate a stereophotogrammetric 3D camera system for the quantification of HPV-induced lesions. Methods The camera system was validated for accuracy, precision and interoperator and inter-rater variability. Subsequently, 3D photographs were quantified and compared to caliper measurements for clinical validation by Bland-Altman modelling, based on data from 80 patients with cutaneous warts (CW), 24 with anogenital warts (AGW) patients and 12 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the vulva (vulvar HSIL) with a total lesion count of 220 CW, 74 AGW and 31 vulvar HSIL. Results Technical validation showed excellent accuracy [coefficients of variation (CV) <= 0.68%] and reproducibility (CVs <= 2%), a good to excellent agreement between operators (CVs <= 8.7%) and a good to excellent agreement between different raters for all three lesion types (ICCs >= 0.86). When comparing 3D with caliper measurements, excellent biases were found for diameter of AGW (long diameter 5%), good biases were found for diameter of AGW (short diameter 10%) and height of CW (8%), and acceptable biases were found for the diameter of CW (11%) and vulvar HSIL (short diameter 14%, long diameter 16%). An unfavourable difference between these methods (bias 25%) was found for the assessment of height of AGWs. Conclusion Stereophotogrammetric 3D imaging is an accurate and reliable method for the clinical visualization and quantification of HPV-induced skin lesions. Show less
Kolk, T. van der; Assil, S.; Rijneveld, R.; Klaassen, E.S.; Feiss, G.; Florencia, E.; ... ; Doorn, M.B.A. van 2018
