Summery: This study examined the development of 74 adolescents (13 to 17 years old, 62% boys) after their placement in the non-residential alternative educational facility School2Care, including... Show moreSummery: This study examined the development of 74 adolescents (13 to 17 years old, 62% boys) after their placement in the non-residential alternative educational facility School2Care, including the prevention of secure residential placement. Findings: Results showed that 70% of the adolescents were not placed in a secure residential facility up until six months after leaving the educational facility. Adaptive emotion regulation strategies and feelings of empower-ment showed positive changes and parent-reported externalizing problems decreased. No improvements were found in adolescents' future-time perspective, family functioning and parenting stress. Differences in family functioning, treatment motivation and teacher-reported therapeutic alliances predicted secure residential placement. Applications: Findings of this study provide some preliminary evidence that School2Care can possibly contribute to positive outcomes, which should be tested in (quasi-)experimental research, but also show that further improvement of the intervention may be required. Show less
Pronk, S.; Kuiper, C.; Smit, D.; Stams, G.J.; Popma, A.; Mulder, E.; Berg, G. van den 2020
In this multilevel meta-analysis the outcomes of adolescents with complex problems at risk for school drop-out attending nonresidential alternative educational facilities were examined. Ten studies... Show moreIn this multilevel meta-analysis the outcomes of adolescents with complex problems at risk for school drop-out attending nonresidential alternative educational facilities were examined. Ten studies (87 effect sizes), examining outcomes on social-emotional functioning, academic achievement, academic attitude, externalizing and internalizing problems, were included. The findings indicated a small but significant overall effect (d = 0.15, p =.03), providing preliminary evidence that these facilities may be associated with positive outcomes for adolescents. Study quality, measurement type and reliability of the assessment instruments were significant moderators of the overall effect size. Results of this study urge for more high quality research on nonresidential alternative educational facilities, because they can contribute to positive youth outcomes, which in turn may prevent school drop-out and other negative life outcomes. Show less
