BackgroundSince giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) and other giant cell rich tumors of bone (GCRTB) share the histological presence of osteoclastic giant cells and expression of RANK/RANKL, we... Show moreBackgroundSince giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) and other giant cell rich tumors of bone (GCRTB) share the histological presence of osteoclastic giant cells and expression of RANK/RANKL, we hypothesized that GCRTB will respond similarly to denosumab as GCTB. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of denosumab in patients with GCRTB that have recurred or require morbid surgery.MethodsIn this open-label, multicenter, phase II trial, patients with GCRTB were included (June 2018-March 2020). Recruitment was stopped because of low accrual. Patients received denosumab (120 mg) subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of every 4-week cycle with a loading dose of 120 mg SC on days 8 and 15.ResultsThree patients were enrolled. One withdrew consent before start of study. The remaining patients had central giant cell granuloma of the jawbone (CGCG). Median treatment duration was 15 cycles (range 12-18). In both subjects, improvement in ossification of lesions was seen. Median follow-up was 28.5 months (range 20-37). One patient developed a recurrence for which surgery was performed.ConclusionDue to critical emerging real-world data of denosumab in GCRTBs, the study was prematurely stopped and not supportive of use of denosumab for this indication. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03605199). Show less
Lipplaa, A.; Schreuder, W.H.; Pichardo, S.E.C.; Gelderblom, H. 2023
Background: Since giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) and other giant cell rich tumors of bone (GCRTB) share the histological presence of osteoclastic giant cells and expression of RANK/RANKL, we... Show moreBackground: Since giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) and other giant cell rich tumors of bone (GCRTB) share the histological presence of osteoclastic giant cells and expression of RANK/RANKL, we hypothesized that GCRTB will respond similarly to denosumab as GCTB. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of denosumab in patients with GCRTB that have recurred or require morbid surgery.Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase II trial, patients with GCRTB were included (June 2018-March 2020). Recruitment was stopped because of low accrual. Patients received denosumab (120 mg) subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of every 4-week cycle with a loading dose of 120 mg SC on days 8 and 15.Results: Three patients were enrolled. One withdrew consent before start of study. The remaining patients had central giant cell granuloma of the jawbone (CGCG). Median treatment duration was 15 cycles (range 12-18). In both subjects, improvement in ossification of lesions was seen. Median follow-up was 28.5 months (range 20-37). One patient developed a recurrence for which surgery was performed.Conclusion: Due to critical emerging real-world data of denosumab in GCRTBs, the study was prematurely stopped and not supportive of use of denosumab for this indication. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03605199).Keywords: aneurysmal bone cyst; denosumab; giant cell granuloma; giant cell rich tumor of bone; systemic therapy. Show less
Meier, M.E.; Hagelstein-Rotman, M.; Ven, A.C. van de; Geest, I.C.M. van der; Donker, O.; Pichardo, S.E.C.; ... ; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M. 2022
Background: Fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome (FD/MAS) may cause pain, impaired ambulation and decreased quality of life (QoL). International guidelines advocate management of FD/MAS in a... Show moreBackground: Fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome (FD/MAS) may cause pain, impaired ambulation and decreased quality of life (QoL). International guidelines advocate management of FD/MAS in a tertiary multidisciplinary care pathway, but no longitudinal data are available to support this recommendation. This multicenter prospective observational study aimed to evaluate effects of 1 year of treatment in the FD/MAS care pathway in 2 tertiary clinics on QoL and pain, assessed by change in Short Form 36 and Brief Pain Inventory between baseline and follow-up. Patients completing baseline questionnaires < 1 year after intake were classified as new referrals, others as under chronic care. Results: 92 patients were included, 61 females (66%). 22 patients (24%) had monostotic disease, 16 (17%) isolated craniofacial FD, 27 (40%) polyostotic FD and 17 (19%) MAS. 26 were new referrals (28%) and 66 chronic patients (72%). Median age at baseline was 47 years (Q1-Q3 36-56). Skeletal burden correlated with baseline Physical Function (r(s) = - 0.281, p = 0.007). QoL was in all domains lower compared to the general population. New referrals reported clinically important differences (CID) over time in domains Physical Function (mean 67 & PLUSMN; SD24 to 74 & PLUSMN; 21, effect size (ES) 0.31, p = 0.020), Role Physical (39 & PLUSMN; 41 to 53 & PLUSMN; 43, ES 0.35, p = 0.066), Social Functioning (64 & PLUSMN; 24 to 76 & PLUSMN; 23, ES 0.49, p = 0.054), and Health Change (39 & PLUSMN; 19 to 53 & PLUSMN; 24, ES 0.76, p = 0.016), chronic patients in Physical Function (52 & PLUSMN; 46 to 66 & PLUSMN; 43, ES 0.31, p = 0.023) and Emotional Wellbeing (54 & PLUSMN; 27 to 70 & PLUSMN; 15, ES 0.59, p < 0.001). New referrals reported a CID of 1 point in maximum pain, average pain and pain interference, chronic patients reported stable scores. Change in pain interference and Role Physical were correlated (r(s) = - 0.472, p < 0.001). Patients with limited disease extent improved more than patients with severe disease. Patients receiving FD-related therapy had lower baseline scores than patients not receiving therapy and reported improvements in QoL after 1 year. Yet also patients without FD-related therapy improved in Physical Function. Conclusions: All FD-subtypes may induce pain and reduced QoL. A multidisciplinary care pathway for FD/MAS may improve pain and QoL, mainly in new referrals without MAS comorbidities with low baseline scores. Therefore, we recommend referral of patients with all subtypes of FD/MAS to specialized academic centers. Show less
Meent, M.M. van de; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.; Wetselaar-Glas, M.J.M.; Pichardo, S.E.C.; Merkesteyn, J.P.R. van 2022
This study aims to evaluate short-term and long-term results of bisphosphonate therapy in patients with diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis/tendoperiostitis (DSO/TP) of the mandible. Eighteen patients... Show moreThis study aims to evaluate short-term and long-term results of bisphosphonate therapy in patients with diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis/tendoperiostitis (DSO/TP) of the mandible. Eighteen patients (12 female, 6 male) aged 34.8 +/- 22.2 years with DSO/TP of the mandible that were treated with bisphosphonates were included. In 16 patients, the bisphosphonate treatment led to remission with decrease of symptoms (pain, swelling of the cheek, trismus, tenderness of masticatory muscles) with a follow-up period of 4.5 (0.8-11.9) years between start of bisphosphonate treatment and latest follow-up consult. Of these, three patients were still in need of regular bisphosphonate therapy. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Bisphosphonate therapy is a treatment option for DSO/TP of the mandible that is associated with a high chance of remission of symptoms. Within the limitations of the study it seems that this treatment might be an effective second step in DSO/TP refractory to conservative treatment. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
This thesis aimed to provide more insight in the diagnosis of MRONJ and to study the best treatment for MRONJ. In order to give more insight in the different aspects of the diagnosis of MRONJ, part... Show moreThis thesis aimed to provide more insight in the diagnosis of MRONJ and to study the best treatment for MRONJ. In order to give more insight in the different aspects of the diagnosis of MRONJ, part I focuses on origin, clinical and radiological features with a special interest for dental implants. This thesis therefore shows that MRONJ is precipitated by dental pathology, a dental/surgical procedure or a pressure sore. Therefore, there should be a more prominent role for prevention of MRONJ. For dental clinicians, but also for the prescribing doctors (e.g. internists such as oncologist and hematologists, general practitioners) this would mean a focus on informing patients of the possible disease and dose depending risks for MRONJ. Dental check-ups before initiation of the anti-resorptive therapy might be advisable and maintenance of a good dental hygiene is of upmost importance. Consequently, dental hygiene should be optimal in patients using anti-resorptive medication and eligible for implants to prevent development of peri-implantitis, which can lead to MRONJ. In addition the decision for insertion of implants should be made on an individual level and preferably in a specialised centre because of the increased risk of development of MRONJ in long term users.A combination of clinical and radiological examination should dictate the diagnosis and treatment. DRONJ may unintentionally be undertreated because it does not present itself as clearly as BRONJ as this thesis shows. Part II focuses on the surgical treatment of MRONJ. Surgical treatment of BRONJ and DRONJ is challenging since no consensus is found in the literature. This thesis shows that treatment according to our surgical technique has a high success rate in all stages of MRONJ. The technique is based on a few relatively simple surgical principles comprising extensive saucerization and rounding off in combination with primary closure. In literature this technique is in line with others, with comparable success rates. Show less
Pichardo, S.E.C.; Hee, J.G. van der; Fiocco, M.; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.; Merkesteyn, J.P.R. van 2020
An increasing number of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) has recently been reported. It is still being debated whether the presence or placement of dental implants... Show moreAn increasing number of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) has recently been reported. It is still being debated whether the presence or placement of dental implants can lead to MRONJ, so the aim of this study was to find out whether dental implants are a risk factor for MRONJ. From January 2003-January 2019 180 patients with MRONJ were seen at the Leiden University Medical Center. Luxating moments for the onset of MRONJ were calculated retrospectively. We collected clinical data and details of antiresorptive medication and found 22 patients with both dental implants and MRONJ. In 18 patients the implants were in the region of the MRONJ and they were included in this study, 14 who had had implants before using antiresorptive drugs and four who had had antiresorptive drugs before or at the time that the implants were placed. The median times between the placement of implants and the diagnosis of MRONJ in these two groups were 24 months and 6 months, respectively. Among the 47 implants, 30 were located in the necrotic region, and all 30 were either lost spontaneously or had to be removed during treatment of MRONJ. Our results show an increased risk for developing MRONJ in patients with dental implants. Both peri-implantitis around previously placed implants, and insertion of dental implants, are risk factors. Prevention of peri-implantitis and caution when inserting dental implants in patients who take antiresorptive medication are therefore important. (C) 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Meent, M.M. van de; Pichardo, S.E.C.; Appelman-Dijkstra, N.M.; Merkesteyn, J.P.R. van 2020
Treating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of... Show moreTreating chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is challenging and many treatments have been reported. However, we know of no standard protocol or guidelines. In this systematic review of relevant publications we provide an overview of the different treatments used. We made an electronic search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, for papers that described the treatment of DSO of the mandible. The search yielded 48 papers that applied to all inclusion criteria, resulting in 16 case reports, 13 case series, 18 retrospective clinical cohort studies, and one randomised controlled trial. Reported treatment options included different operations; the use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antiresorptive medication; conservative treatment; and hyperbaric oxygen. Surgical treatment resulted in a low success rate and was associated with higher morbidity than other treatments. Conservative treatment, and that of bisphosphonates, yielded more promising results, so conservative treatment and bisphosphonates seem to be the most promising therapeutic options. However, because of the high risk of bias, no firm conclusions can be drawn, and larger studies with clear inclusion criteria and specified endpoints are needed. (C) 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Meent, M.M. van de; Pichardo, S.E.C.; Rodrigues, M.E.; Verbist, B.M.; Merkesteyn, J.P.R. van 2018
