OBJECTIVES\nDESIGN\nSETTING\nPATIENTS\nINTERVENTIONS\nMEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS\nCONCLUSIONS\nTo compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IV midazolam after cardiac surgery between... Show moreOBJECTIVES\nDESIGN\nSETTING\nPATIENTS\nINTERVENTIONS\nMEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS\nCONCLUSIONS\nTo compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IV midazolam after cardiac surgery between children with and without Down syndrome.\nProspective, single-center observational trial.\nPICU in a university-affiliated pediatric teaching hospital.\nTwenty-one children with Down syndrome and 17 without, 3-36 months, scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.\nPostoperatively, nurses regularly assessed the children's pain and discomfort with the validated COMFORT-Behavioral scale and Numeric Rating Scale for pain. A loading dose of morphine (100 µg/kg) was administered after coming off bypass; thereafter, morphine infusion was commenced at 40 µg/kg/hr. Midazolam was started if COMFORT-Behavioral scale score of greater than 16 and Numeric Rating Scale score of less than 4 (suggestive of undersedation). Plasma midazolam and metabolite concentrations were measured for population pharmacokinetic- and pharmacodynamic analysis using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) (Version VI; GloboMax LLC, Hanover, MD) software.\nTwenty-six children (72%) required midazolam postoperatively (15 with Down syndrome and 11 without; p = 1.00). Neither the cumulative midazolam dose (p = 0.61) nor the time elapsed before additional sedation was initiated (p = 0.71), statistically significantly differed between children with and without Down syndrome. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the children with and without Down syndrome. Bodyweight was a significant covariate for the clearance of 1-OH-midazolam to 1-OH-glucuronide (p = 0.003). Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed a marginal effect of the midazolam concentration on the COMFORT-Behavioral score.\nThe majority of children with and without Down syndrome required additional sedation after cardiac surgery. This pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis does not provide evidence for different dosing of midazolam in children with Down syndrome after cardiac surgery. Show less
Since in vitro studies and a preliminary clinical report suggested the efficacy of chloroquine for COVID-19-associated pneumonia, there is increasing interest in this old antimalarial drug. In this... Show moreSince in vitro studies and a preliminary clinical report suggested the efficacy of chloroquine for COVID-19-associated pneumonia, there is increasing interest in this old antimalarial drug. In this article, we discuss the pharmacokinetics and safety of chloroquine that should be considered in light of use in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Chloroquine is well absorbed and distributes extensively resulting in a large volume of distribution with an apparent and terminal half-life of 1.6 days and 2 weeks, respectively. Chloroquine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 and renal clearance is responsible for one third of total clearance. The lack of reliable information on target concentrations or doses for COVID-19 implies that for both adults and children, doses that proved effective and safe in malaria should be considered, such as 'loading doses' in adults (30 mg/kg over 48 h) and children (70 mg/kg over 5 days), which reported good tolerability. Here, plasma concentrations were < 2.5 mu mol/L, which is associated with (minor) toxicity. While the influence of renal dysfunction, critical illness, or obesity seems small, in critically ill patients, reduced absorption may be anticipated. Clinical experience has shown that chloroquine has a narrow safety margin, as three times the adult therapeutic dosage for malaria can be lethal when given as a single dose. Although infrequent, poisoning in children is extremely dangerous where one to two tablets can potentially be fatal. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetic and safety properties of chloroquine suggest that chloroquine can be used safely for an acute virus infection, under corrected QT monitoring, but also that the safety margin is small, particularly in children. Show less
Blussé van Oud-Alblas, H.J.; Brill, M.J.E.; Peeters, M.Y.M.; Tibboel, D.; Danhof, M.; Knibbe, C.A.J. 2019
Background: In adolescents limited data are available on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of propofol. In this study we derived a PK-PD model for propofol in adolescents... Show moreBackground: In adolescents limited data are available on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of propofol. In this study we derived a PK-PD model for propofol in adolescents undergoing idiopathic scoliosis surgery with an intraoperative wake-up test with reinduction of anesthesia using both Bispectral Index (BIS) and composite A-line ARX index (cAAI) as endpoints.Methods: Fourteen adolescents (9.8-20.1 years) were evaluated during standardized propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for idiopathic scoliosis surgery with an intraoperative wake-up test with reinduction of anesthesia. BIS and cAAI were continuously measured and blood samples collected. A propofol PKPD model was developed using NONMEM.Results: The time courses of propofol concentrations, BIS and cAAI values during anesthesia, intra-operative wakeup and reduction of anesthesia were best described by a two-compartment PK model linked to an inhibitory sigmoidal Emax PD model. For the sigmoidal Emax model, the propofol concentration at half maximum effect (EC50) was 3.51 and 2.14 mg/L and Hill coefficient 1.43 and 6.85 for BIS and cAAI, respectively. The delay in PD effect in relation to plasma concentration was best described by a two compartment effect-site model with a ke(o) of 0.102 min(-1), ke(12) of 0. 121 min(-1) and ke(21) of 0.172 min(-1).Conclusions: A population PKPD model for propofol in adolescents was developed that successfully described the time course of propofol concentration, BIS and cAAI in individuals upon undergoing scoliosis surgery with intraoperative wake-up test and reinduction of anesthesia. Large differences were demonstrated between both monitors. This may imply that BIS and cAAI measure fundamentally different endpoints in the brain. Show less
The overall goal was to develop individualized dosing guidelines for the sedatives propofol and midazolam in infants and in critically ill patients, on the basis of population pharmacokinetic... Show moreThe overall goal was to develop individualized dosing guidelines for the sedatives propofol and midazolam in infants and in critically ill patients, on the basis of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling. Both under- and oversedation significantly and adversely affects patient outcome. Due to the high intra- and interindividual variability in dose requirements dosing is complicated. In this thesis the interindividual variability in response has been examined by covariate analysis. In this analysis the effects of bodyweight, cardiac function, severity of illness and liver blood flow and the unexplained interindividual variability have been characterized. It was shown that infants require higher doses of propofol because of differences in pharmacokinetics rather than pharmacodynamics. When comparing the results of the PK-PD model of propofol and midazolam in infants, propofol is preferred over midazolam because of the lower interindividual variability in pharmacodynamics compared to midazolam. In critically ill patients severity of the illness was found to be a major determinant of the level of sedation, with lower propofol dosing requirements with increasing severity of illness. The PK-PD models can be used as a basis for individualized dosing of propofol and midazolam, which is essential for optimizing the quality of sedation in clinical practice and will improve patients__ outcome. Show less
