Background: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our... Show moreBackground: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. Methods and findings: We performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat.From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 +/- SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p= 0.32). In women with >80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates. Conclusions: In this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. Show less
Tummers, F.H.M.P.; Huizinga, C.R.H.; Pampus, M.G. van; Stockmann, H.B.A.C.; Cohen, A.F.; Bogt, K.E.A. van der; Fit Perform Collaborators 2021
BackgroundThe field of obstetrics and gynecology requires complex decision-making and skills because of unexpected high-risk situations. These skills are influenced by alertness, reaction time, and... Show moreBackgroundThe field of obstetrics and gynecology requires complex decision-making and skills because of unexpected high-risk situations. These skills are influenced by alertness, reaction time, and concentration. Night shifts result in sleep deprivation, which might impair these functions, although it is still unclear to what extent.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether a night shift routinely impairs the obstetrics and gynecology consultants’ and residents’ fitness to perform and whether this reaches a critical limit compared with relevant frames of reference.Study DesignResidents (n=33) and consultants (n=46) in obstetrics and gynecology conducted multiple measurements (n=415) at precall, postcall, and noncall moments with the fitness to perform self-test. The self-test consists of an adaptive pursuit tracking task that is able to objectively measure alertness, reaction time, concentration, and hand-eye coordination and Visual Analog Scale tests to subjectively score alertness. The test is validated with a sociolegal reference of a 0.06% ethanol blood concentration (the peak level after 2 units of alcohol, the legal driving limit). This equals −1.37% on the objective score and −8.17 points on subjective alertness. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the difference within subjects over a night shift, integrating repeated measures over time.ResultsThe overnight objective difference between postcall and precall measurements was −0.62 (P<.05) for residents and 0.28 (P=NS) for consultants, both not exceeding the sociolegal reference as a group. Objective impairment exceeded the reference for 31% of the residents and 28% of the consultants. Subjective alertness decreased in residents (−18.26; P<.001) and consultants (−10.85; P<.001), both exceeding the reference. No residents had to continue work postcall versus 7.8% of the consultants. None of the consultants that had to continue work were in an objective critically impaired state.ConclusionThis study provides insight and awareness of individual performance after night shifts with clear frames of reference. The performance of residents is negatively and significantly affected by night shifts; therefore, a scheduled day off after a night shift is justified. Consultants showed no overall impairment; however, a quarter did exceed the alcohol limit reference after their night shift. If not logistically feasible to schedule a protected day off after a night shift, our group recommends safe shift scheduling, including options to transfer care after a demanding night shift to prevent working in a compromised state. Show less
Background: Surgical skills and decision making are influenced by alertness, reaction time, eye-hand coordination, and concentration. Night shift might impair these functions but it is unclear to... Show moreBackground: Surgical skills and decision making are influenced by alertness, reaction time, eye-hand coordination, and concentration. Night shift might impair these functions but it is unclear to what extent. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a night shift routinely impairs the surgeon's fitness to perform and whether this reaches a critical limit as compared to relevant frames of reference.Methods: Consultants (n = 59) and residents (n = 103) conducted fitness to perform measurements at precall, postcall, and noncall moments. This validated self-test consists of an adaptive tracker that is able to objectively measure alertness, reaction time, concentration, and eye-hand coordination, and multiple visual analog scales to subjectively score alertness. Results are compared to sociolegal (ethanol) and professional (operative skills) frames of reference that refer to a decrease under the influence of 0.06% ethanol.Results: Residents spent 1.7 call hours asleep on average as compared to 5.4 for consultants. Subjective alertness decreased in residents after night shifts (-13, P < 0.001) but not in consultants (-1.2, P = NS). The overnight difference in tracker score was -1.17 (P < 0.001) for residents and 0.46 (P = NS) for surgeons. Postcall subjective alertness only correlated to objective alertness in consultants. For residents, hours slept on-call correlated to objective alertness. For consultants, subsequent night calls significantly correlated to objective alertness, with the third subsequent call related to performance below the reference.Conclusions: Consultants remain fit to perform after night call, but subsequent calls may compromise clinical activities. This study provides insight and awareness of individual performance with clear frames of reference. Show less
Ruiter, L.; Eschbach, S.J.; Burgers, M.; Rengerink, K.O.; Pampus, M.G. van; Goes, B.Y. van der; ... ; Pajkrt, E. 2016
