BackgroundIn this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab across various mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)... Show moreBackgroundIn this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab across various mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). This is a clinical study in which patients are treated with drugs outside their labeled indication, based on their tumour molecular profile.Patients and methodsPatients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours who had exhausted all standard of care options were eligible. Patients were treated with durvalumab. The primary endpoints were clinical benefit ((CB): objective response (OR) or stable disease ≥16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1, up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB in stage 1. At baseline, fresh frozen biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses.ResultsTwenty-six patients with 10 different cancer types were included. Two patients (2/26, 8%) were considered as non-evaluable for the primary endpoint. CB was observed in 13 patients (13/26, 50%) with an OR in 7 patients (7/26, 27%). The remaining 11 patients (11/26, 42%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 5 months (95% CI, 2-not reached) and 14 months (95% CI, 5-not reached), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. We found a significantly higher structural variant (SV) burden in patients without CB. Additionally, we observed a significant enrichment of JAK1 frameshift mutations and a significantly lower IFN-γ expression in patients without CB.ConclusionDurvalumab was generally well-tolerated and provided durable responses in pre-treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours. High SV burden, JAK1 frameshift mutations and low IFN-γ expression were associated with a lack of CB; this provides a rationale for larger studies to validate these findings. Show less
Selection of patients who will likely respond or will develop relevant side effects has the potential to improve anticancer therapy. Considering the many contributing factors in drug disposition,... Show moreSelection of patients who will likely respond or will develop relevant side effects has the potential to improve anticancer therapy. Considering the many contributing factors in drug disposition, we hypothesized that variability in drug disposition could be better explained by phenotype, rather than by the genotype alone. In this thesis, phenotype tests in oncology were studied, with a focus on phenotype breath tests and CYP2D6 metabolism in breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. A review is given of phenotype studies published before 2011 addressing drug metabolizing enzymes in relation to anticancer drugs. The 13C-dextromethorphan-breath test was related to CYP2D6 genotype and serum concentrations of endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen. A 13C-dextromethorphan breath test was equally predictive of endoxifen levels as compared to the CYP2D6 genotype. We showed that there was no difference in CYP2D6 phenotype between metastasized patients and early breast cancer patients. Because endoxifen levels did not significantly differ between the two groups as well, our findings do not have clinical implications thus far. Show less
Background/aim: Statin intolerance is increasingly recognized as a therapy limiting factor in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Since vulnerability to dose related... Show moreBackground/aim: Statin intolerance is increasingly recognized as a therapy limiting factor in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Since vulnerability to dose related adverse events differ between subjects treated with statins we hypothesized low-dose simvastatin would be tolerated and effective in statin-intolerant patients. Method: A single center open label prospective observational study was performed assessing tolerability and efficacy of low-dose simvastatin treatment in 35 statin-intolerant patients. Statin intolerance was defined as not being able to tolerate a registered dose statin due to myalgia-myopathy, myositis, or elevation of serum liver enzyme levels. These statin-intolerant patients were treated with simvastatin with an initial dose of 2.5 mg every other day. The dose was titrated upwards if possible. Tolerability was defined as remaining on treatment. Efficacy was defined as change of LDL-cholesterol compared to baseline. Results: The reached simvastatin dose ranged from 0.825 to 8.75 mg/day with a mean dose of 4 mg/day. Fifty-seven percent of the patients tolerated low-dose therapy and remained on treatment. Of these patients, 30% noted recurrent myalgia. Low-dose simvastatin significantly decreased mean(SD) LDL-cholesterol levels with 25.9(12.1)% (p<0.001). Eleven percent of the patients reached LDL-cholesterol target levels (<2.6 mmol/l) in an intention to treat analysis and in 20% of patients that tolerated low-dose simvastatin. Conclusion: Low-dose simvastatin therapy is tolerated in a considerable proportion of statin-intolerant patients with significant lipid lowering efficacy. Low-dose statin therapy can be considered in multidrug regimens in statin-intolerant patients. (C) 2010 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Show less
