Objectives We aimed first to summarise minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) after total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured using the... Show moreObjectives We aimed first to summarise minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) after total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Secondly, we aimed to improve the precision of MCID estimates by means of meta-analysis.Methods We conducted a systematic review of English and non-English articles using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960-2011), EMBASE (1991-2011), Web of Science, Academic Search Premier and Science Direct. Bibliographies of included studies were searched in order to find additional studies. Search terms included MCID or minimal clinically important change, THR or TKR and Short-Form 36. We included longitudinal studies that estimated MCID of SF-36 after THR or TKR.Results Three studies met our inclusion criteria, describing a distinct study population: primary THR, primary TKR and revision THR. No synthesis of study results can be given.Conclusions Although we found MCIDs in HRQoL after THR or TKR have limited precision and are not validated using external criteria, these are still the best known estimates of MCIDs in HRQoL after THR and TKR to date. We therefore advise these MCIDs to be used as absolute thresholds, but with caution. Show less
Hollander, W. den; Bos, S.D.; Ramos, Y.F.; Lakenberg, N.; Breggen, R. van der; Duijnisveld, B.J.; ... ; Meulenbelt, I. 2012
OBJECTIVE To investigate the validity of joint space width (JSW) measurements in millimeters (mm) in hand osteoarthritis (OA) patients by comparison to controls, grading of joint space narrowing ... Show moreOBJECTIVE To investigate the validity of joint space width (JSW) measurements in millimeters (mm) in hand osteoarthritis (OA) patients by comparison to controls, grading of joint space narrowing (JSN), and clinical features. METHODS Hand radiographs of 235 hand OA patients (mean age 65 years, 83% women) and 471 controls were used. JSW was measured with semi-automated image analysis software in the distal, proximal interphalangeal and metacarpal joints (DIPJs, PIPJs and MCPJs). JSN (grade 0-3) was assessed using the osteoarthritis research society international (OARSI) atlas. Associations between the two methods and clinical determinants (presence of pain, nodes and/or erosions, decreased mobility) were assessed using Generalized Estimating Equations with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and mean width of proximal phalanx. RESULTS JSW was measured in 5631 joints with a mean JSW of 0.98 mm (standard deviation (SD) 0.21), being the smallest for DIPJs (0.70 (SD 0.25)) and largest for MCPJs (1.40 (SD 0.25)). The JSN=0 group had a mean JSW of 1.28 mm (SD 0.34), the JSN=3 group 0.17 mm (SD 0.23). Controls had larger JSW than hand OA patients (P-value<0.001). In hand OA, females had smaller JSW than men (β -0.08, (95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.15 to -0.01)) and lower JSW was associated with the presence of pain, nodes, erosions and decreased mobility (adjusted β -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.16), -0.37 (-0.40, -0.34), -0.61 (-0.68, -0.54) and -0.46 (-0.68, -0.24) respectively). These associations were similar for JSN in grades. CONCLUSION In hand OA the quantitative JSW measurement is a valid method to measure joint space and shows a good relation with clinical features. Show less
Objective To investigate the association between weight or body mass index (BMI) and the development of hand osteoarthritis. Methods Systematic review of observational studies. Medical databases... Show moreObjective To investigate the association between weight or body mass index (BMI) and the development of hand osteoarthritis. Methods Systematic review of observational studies. Medical databases were searched up to April 2008. Articles that presented data on the association between weight and hand osteoarthritis were selected. The qualities of these studies were then assessed by two independent reviewers using a 19 criteria scoring system. Using the mean scores of all studies as a cut-off value, the studies were deemed as high or low quality. Study quality and study designs were combined to determine the level of evidence using best-evidence synthesis, which consisted of five levels of evidence. Results From the 25 studies included, two had cohort, three case-control and 20 cross-sectional study designs. Fifteen studies were considered high-quality studies. Of these high-quality studies, one cohort, two case-control and seven cross-sectional studies showed a positive association between weight or BMI and hand osteoarthritis. Based on three high-quality studies with preferred study designs (one cohort and two case-control) with a positive association, the level of evidence of the association between overweight and developing hand osteoarthritis is moderate. The approximate risk ratio of this association is 1.9. Conclusion Weight or BMI is associated with the development of hand osteoarthritis. The level of evidence of published studies is moderate according to best-evidence synthesis. Further high-quality cohort or case-control studies are needed to elucidate the role of weight in hand osteoarthritis. Show less
Background Tibiofemoral alignment has a role in knee osteoarthritis (OA), but which factors contribute to alignment is unknown. Objective To investigate familial aggregation of tibiofemoral... Show moreBackground Tibiofemoral alignment has a role in knee osteoarthritis (OA), but which factors contribute to alignment is unknown. Objective To investigate familial aggregation of tibiofemoral alignment in participants of the GARP (Genetics ARthrosis and Progression) study. Methods The tibiofemoral anatomical angle on semiflexed knee radiographs was measured in sibling pairs (mean age 60 years, 81% women) with primary OA with multiple joint involvement. Radiographic OA was assessed according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) method. Heritability estimates of the tibiofemoral angle were calculated by comparing twice the between-sibling variance with the total variance; adjustments were made for age, gender, body mass index, history of meniscectomy, lower limb fracture and in analyses including all knees, for KL score. Results 360 subjects representing 180 families were studied. The mean (SD) tibiofemoral angle of right and left knees in the probands was 182.7 (2.9)degrees and 182.8 (2.6)degrees, respectively; similar angles were measured in the siblings. Radiographic knee OA (KL score >= 2) was present in 27% of the knees. Stratified analyses in sib pairs with non-osteoarthritic right or left knees showed adjusted heritability estimates of the tibiofemoral angle of the right and left knees of 0.42 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.82) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.93). In addition, adjusted heritability estimates of the tibiofemoral angle in all right and left knees were calculated, being 0.48 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.78) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.79), respectively. Conclusion The alignment of the tibiofemoral joint is influenced by familial factors, implying that tibiofemoral malalignment may add to the genetic predisposition for knee OA development. These results need to be confirmed in other study populations. Show less
BACKGROUND: /st> Tibiofemoral alignment has a role in knee osteoarthritis (OA), but which factors contribute to alignment is unknown. OBJECTIVE: /st> To investigate familial aggregation of... Show moreBACKGROUND: /st> Tibiofemoral alignment has a role in knee osteoarthritis (OA), but which factors contribute to alignment is unknown. OBJECTIVE: /st> To investigate familial aggregation of tibiofemoral alignment in participants of the GARP (Genetics ARthrosis and Progression) study. METHODS: /st> The tibiofemoral anatomical angle on semifiexed knee radiographs was measured in sibling pairs (mean age 60 years, 81% women) with primary OA with multiple joint involvement. Radiographic OA was assessed according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) method. Heritability estimates of the tibiofemoral angle were calculated by comparing twice the betweensibling variance with the total variance; adjustments were made for age, gender, body mass index, history of meniscectomy, lower limb fracture and in analyses including all knees, for KL score. RESULTS: /st> 360 subjects representing 180 families were studied. The mean (SD) tibiofemoral angle of right and left knees in the probands was 182.7 (2.9) degrees and 182.8 (2.6) degrees , respectively; similar angles were measured in the siblings. Radiographic knee OA (KL score >/=2) was present in 27% of the knees. Stratified analyses in sib pairs with non-osteoarthritic right or left knees showed adjusted heritability estimates of the tibiofemoral angle of the right and left knees of 0.42 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.82) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.93). In addition, adjusted heritability estimates of the tibiofemoral angle in all right and left knees were calculated, being 0.48 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.78) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.79), respectively. CONCLUSION: /st> The alignment of the tibiofemoral joint is influenced by familial factors, implying that tibiofemoral malalignment may add to the genetic predisposition for knee OA development. These results need to be confirmed in other study populations. Show less
